Yesterday I attended BioMedCentral’s 10th anniversary celebrations and research awards. Yes, it is a whole ten years ago that Vitek Tracz created his novel publishing business model of “author pays” open access, or “gold” open access as it is sometimes known. At the time it excited quite a bit of discussion (e.g. this message and others in the thread) and I suspect that many people thought it was a crazy idea. BMC has had a few ups and down since then – raising its prices and changing the way that its membership subscriptions worked, then being bought up by one of the big commercial publishers – but it has survived and appears to be moderately successful. So, I think congratulations are due to the BMC team. The model they pioneered has been successful and has been taken up by a wide variety of publishers, even our own dear NPG (though perhaps not as widely as some would want).
Congratulations are due to BMC not least for throwing rather a good party, at the top of the Gherkin building, giving me an excuse to post a few photos here. Sadly it was rather a gloomy, overcast evening so they are a bit grey.
Roof of the Gherkin building
View from the Gherkin
Another view, showing Tower 42
The BMC research awards were also presented, with Matt Cockerill doing his best Jonathan Ross impersonation and a host of luminaries announcing the prizes: Tim Hunt, Richard Smith, Peter Murray-Rust, Cameron Neylon, to name a few. The list of prize-winners is on the BMC website. I didn’t receive a prize, in case you were wondering. Neither did another NN reprobate regular who was there:
Graham Steel – looking scary
I don’t know how many other publishers award prizes for papers they publish, but it is a nice idea. PNAS have their Cozzarelli prize. The 2009 winners were announced recently. I’m not aware of any others.
Anyway, here’s to the 20th anniversary party in 2020. I’m putting the date in my Google calendar.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Categories
- Art
- Authorship
- Bibliographic management
- Bibliometrics etc
- Blogology
- Books
- Collections
- Communicating science
- Copyright and IP
- Crick
- Document delivery
- E-books
- Education
- Ethics
- Film
- Friends
- Froth
- Future of Libraries
- History
- Information skills
- Journal publishing
- Language
- Libraries and librarians
- Mentoring
- Music
- Open Access
- Peer review
- Reading recommendations
- Research Councils
- Research data
- Research management
- Research tools
- Scientific literature
- Searching
- Social networking
- Uncategorized
- Writing
Blogroll
Syndicated
Meta
-
CILIP member blogs
Thanks for the report. I want more pictures…
I think Graham took a lot more so maybe he can oblige.
I was in a hurry yesterday and forgot to mention two other features of the evening:
a) a very nice and self-deprecatingly funny speech from Evan Harris (ex-MP), referring to the 2004 Select Committee report on Open Access that he was involved in preparing.
b) an auction of a strange assortment of objects (paintings, carvings, chair, iPad, sports tickets) in aid of Computer Aid international which aims to “reduce poverty through practical ICT solutions”.
I’m officially jealous of your trip up the Gherkin.
Elsevier (or at least the irreverent department I grew up in) used to hold an annual award ceremony to celebrate the peccadilloes of its authors. Prizes were given for such achievements as ‘best facial hair’, ‘best excuse for late submission’, ‘worst figure submitted’, ‘most incoherent sentence’, ‘most unlikely name’ (poor Wolfgang Grabarse), etc. etc.
Needless to say, the authors were never notified about their awards, which were instead collected by the editor who handled the manuscript.
Matt – those awards sound much better! I hope the winners are preserved for posterity.
Maybe we should have some NN awards in the same spirit, but avoiding libel of course.
Re. Gherkin, do you mean you havent been up?
It would be fun to run some light-hearted awards on NN, but it’s hard to do it publicly without offending those being mocked. I suppose it could work for ‘best excuse for missing a deadline’ or ‘best lab web site’, but the real gems such as ‘oddest facial hair’ could get a bit personal.
And, yes, of course I’ve been up the gherkin. But I had to queue for five hours and share the view with several hundred people.
Blimey. I only spotted this post today looking to see what pictures of myself show up on Google.
I think I may have slurped quite a few glasses of Champagne judging from THAT picture.
@MartinFenner – Here is a montage of my pics http://youtu.be/FeW4X9DBHAA (pic quality not great due to compression)