VWXYNot? Comment(s) of the week:
Nina and Grant for the following exchange: Nina: "Life should be a conference, everyone wearing nametags all the time, with their first name, last name, nickname, country of origin and country of residence. Birthdate optional."
Grant: Nina, I’m sure tech types will suggest we’ll all be bumping cell phones to exchange names in a few years. (Eurgh.)
One more: you know that thing where the person can’t quite read your name tag and leans in close over your chest to read it…
Nina: "ok, how about tattooing your name onto your forehead?"
Grant: "How about a sub-dermal name implant invisible when not active that glows when triggered by trained neural signals beaming your name to the people opposite you?
Failing that we could all wear electrode scalp caps that carry a flip up sign… (Taking as my cue the brain-computer interfaces emotiv and others are marketing.)"
[NB as a chronic tartler, I approve of all the above methods]
Alyssa for "It’s cloudy again
We see it’s cold and dreary
But – we have windows!!!"
Ricardipus for "Bugger me, the grant’s
Finally done. Thank goodness.
Now back to fun stuff."
Bean-mom for "I just clicked on the article on circular RNAs–I’d seen the headline earlier but hadn’t yet read it–and just as I expected, I’m all WTF?! MicroRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, now we’ve got circular RNAs. . . I feel like someone should just write a review titled, “RNA: WTF?”"
Nina again for "edit: my advisor has improved his standing desk further by standing on a wooden board that balances on a small (but sturdy) plastic tube, to make him wobble while standing, so to keep working those balancing muscles, or something like that. The tube comes from one of my experiments. I will miss that “wtf I’ll create my own standing desk – pilates work-out” attitude, I must admit."
Bob O'H for "Reminds me of my youth playing boardgames. There was one called Civilisation, which a friend described as “almost as long as the real thing”."
Chall "it surely looks like the Leafs MIGHT go to play offs for the first time in 7 years…. if I didn’t jinx it by saying it here of course. That said, I find myself wondering how bad it will be to end 5th place if Boston stays 4th. It sort of feels better to play the 3rd (Capitals right now) than Bruins but right now I’ll settle for PLAYOFFS and miracle :)"
[the Leafs making the playoffs is a miracle indeed]
KJHaxton for "Good question! I’d put:
– occasional baker of cakes for meetings
– fair to moderate tolerance for bullshit
– low tolerance for unfairness and willing to get very cross about it (folds arms and glowers at the screen)
– best selection of tea bags in desk drawer (8 kinds at last count)
– prone to wearing scarves and shirts that don’t match
Ah well, I’m not sure I’d find a new job on the basis of those :)"
Ricardipus again for "Pros:
- rarely swears in public
- has few friends, so unlikely to have loud, belly-laughing conversations on phone or in person
- capable of speaking at length about (a) race cars, (b) cameras, or (c) bad science
Cons:
- occasionally swears in public
- has few friends, so likely to have poor social interactions with co-workers
- capable of speaking at length about (a) race cars, (b) cameras, or (c) bad science
I’d also probably include “easily suckered into serving on irrelevant committees” into each category, too."
Bean-mom again for "–Friendly.
–Doesn’t bake, but if you have a potluck I’ll bring killer spring rolls (both crispy fried pork ones, and the vegetarian fresh rice-paper ones).
–Doesn’t bake, but husband bakes. Occasionally, you may be a recipient of his talent.
–Will cheerfully listen to other people’s dramas, but won’t cause any of my own. Not at work, anyway."
and Nina yet again for "As I may have mentioned before, I’m pretty sure my cv point “Love baking (chocolate) cakes” earned me my PhD position, and it definitely often raised questions in interviews (“so, how often do you bake cake? What kind of chocolate do you use?”)"
Post(s) of the Week: Beth Snow for "Modern conveniences" (how on earth did we survive, let alone study and write theses, before Skype and cloud computing?!)
Steve Caplan for "Science education: the generalist vs the specialist" (are 3 year or 4 year degrees better for students?)
Bean-mom for "Leaving scientific research... again" (science SUCKS sometimes)
Eva Amsen, writing at the Occam's Typewriter Irregulars for "The two ideas to fix the gender balance that do not make me cringe" (the panel pledge and the Finkbeiner test)
Bob O'Hara for "Making reviewing boring stuff less boring" (would a stripped-down manuscript format work better for the, um, less exciting papers out there?)
Alyssa for "Just the pants, thanks" (absolutely hilarious take on the modern clothes shopping experience)
Eva Amsen again for "My self-updating address book" (how LinkedIn can be useful)
CromerCrox for "Plagues" (how's God been cursing you lately?)
Prof-like Substance for "If you don't talk to your kids about it someone else will" (anticipating school-yard talk about religion and other big issues)
and CromerCrox again for "Conferences" (the problem of sexism at conferences)
Archives:
October 2008 - March 2009; April 2009 - September 2009; October 2009 - March 2010; April 2010 - September 2010; October 2010 - February 2011; March 2011 - September 2011; October 2011 - March 2012; April 2012 - September 2012; October 2012 - March 2013; April 2013 - September 2013
The famous Bulgarian prophetess Vanga (Vangelia Dimitrova) prophesied iron death of cancer.
Irons (Handcuffs, Manacles, Shackles, Fetters) & Ferromagnetic Theory of Cancer (Iron Conception) http://www.tutuz.com/?p=1669
The comments on the site are worth a read if you want to be up to date on what the spammers are saying nowadays.
What the Norfolk!?!
I don’t Norwich part is the strangest
Oh damn. I made a comment, and it hasn’t appeared. OT must have finally outed me as David Mabus.
Bum.
I think Ed Yong runs that website in his spare time.
Being the contact email can be troublesome. You want to deal politely with respondents but…
Do you get messages from Dr A. Sayegh? They are challenging.
Tell me about it!
I haven’t had the pleasure of corresponding with Dr. Sayegh. Yet.
There’s an AmEx ad on that website.
The comments seem to be nothing but fake praise from spam bots…
Bah. Does this mean my copper bracelets are no good? How about my tinfoil hat?
I think tin foil hats are still regarded as a panacaea
In this case I think the quotes were necessary.
By the way, WTF is up with that picture? Is this come kind of control. Like, hey we can correctly identify the female gender, so everything else we identify is must also be correct. (Although I can’t really tell from the pic if they are actually men or women or a mixture.)
I had the same thoughts about the picture! (And I’m not convinced it’s all women, either).
Bob, your comments went to spam – no idea why, but I have unspammed them.
I think it’s because I wasn’t logged in, so I was fingered as a new user. Now I’m logged in the software will need a new excuse.
So am I the only one who read your blog title & thought “oh this must be one of her sciencey posts & I’ll come back after my coffee?” Srsly, I thought I needed my brain to be “on” for this post, until I actually read and then face palmed thinking, I must be the only one that thought she was writing a funny sciency post…..
In my defense, I hadn’t yet drank coffee…
I LOVE LOVE LOVE that last quote. AMAZING. I kinda want to tape it to Glenn Beck’s head. Or maybe my head, and make Glenn Beck look at me. Except then I would have to look at Glenn Beck.
Also I am SO GLAD I found you. It was really, really hard. And by hard, I mean I thought, huh, I’m a little behind on Cath’s blog, and she hasn’t popped up in my feed recently. I wonder if she went on a blogging staycation as well? Let me check it out. OMG, she moved house. Er… blog.
I hope that now that you are combining science-y and non-science-y posts there is still plenty of room for spirited discussions about tea.
Holy Writ, Batman. I can’t believe you actually clicked on a link in an unsolicited e-mail, that only contained that link. I suppose it rhymes with a possibly more appropriate exclamation, at least.
Your final quote is awesome. I shall roll it out whenever dealing with woos and wackos online.
ScientistMother, since when do you need your brain on to read this blog?
Ruchi, I’m very glad you found me, too! I’m sorry the link I left in my last post on the old blog was so hard to follow, though
LOL at the Glenn Beck thing. Oh, and yes, there’s always room for tea! Tea, posts about tea, comments about tea, and arguments about the One True Way in which to drink tea.
Mike, the title, with its whiff of excellent blog fodder, was just too tempting! (Although I probably wouldn’t have clicked it if I was on my own personal computer, heh).
Mao Zedong, The Chinese Intellectuals and The Ferromagnetic Theory of Cancer http://www.tutuz.com/?p=1682