{"id":2198,"date":"2012-04-05T08:10:24","date_gmt":"2012-04-05T08:10:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/?p=2198"},"modified":"2013-01-05T08:36:29","modified_gmt":"2013-01-05T08:36:29","slug":"the-man-of-science-and-the-man-of-letters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/2012\/04\/05\/the-man-of-science-and-the-man-of-letters\/","title":{"rendered":"The Man of Science and the Man of Letters"},"content":{"rendered":"

I have just spent a few days in Lichfield, which you might not think of as a key cultural centre, but it happens to be closely associated with two giants, in the form of Erasmus Darwin<\/a> and Samuel Johnson<\/a>, both doctors, though of very different kinds. Looking round the museums representing their respective houses \u2013 for Darwin, the one where he lived and practiced medicine for 23 years from 1758-81; for Johnson the one where he was born and brought up approximately half a century earlier \u2013 it is interesting to put their lives into some sort of juxtaposition.<\/p>\n

Regular readers of this blog will know that Erasmus Darwin is one of my heroes about whom I have written before<\/a>.\u00a0 Charles Darwin\u2019s grandfather, he seems to have had inklings about evolution, which he expressed through the unlikely medium of rhyming couplets in his poem Zoonomia<\/em> and also (albeit briefly, because it offended the clerics from the Cathedral onto which his house backed) through his Latin motto \u2018e conchis omnia<\/em>\u2019.Literally this means \u2018everything from shells\u2019 and it was emblazoned on his coach. During the time he lived in Lichfield time he encountered Samuel Johnson a few times; between them there was clearly mutual dislike if not loathing.\u00a0 The evidence for this comes from the families of one of those very same cathedral clerics, Canon Seward<\/a>, whose daughter Anna wrote an early biography<\/a> of Darwin. More of this below.<\/p>\n

Samuel Johnson was born the son of a rather disorganised bookseller in Lichfield.\u00a0 He is famous for his dictionary and for his wit, which he seems to have made essentially his profession in the way that Georgian society permitted. His background being probably best described as \u2018trade\u2019 (as opposed to \u2018gentleman\u2019), he did manage to get to Oxford for 13 months of education, before having to leave \u2013 without a degree –\u00a0 due to shortage of funds. For this reason the eventual award of an Oxford honorary degree (hence his title of doctor) was probably all the sweeter. But, from what I can gauge, he probably always had a chip on his shoulder about his pedigree and was anxious to get all the recognition he could. I have read his \u2018A journey to the Western Islands of Scotland<\/a><\/em>\u2019, and very pompous and self-satisfied I found it, however \u2018witty\u2019 and informative it may be about the people he met en route<\/em>. Full of self-aggrandisement, it is a testament to how anxious Johnson must always have felt about his standing in a society which believed in Society. He could not take things for granted and needed to feel in the thick of things. He used to visit Lichfield from time to time, and appears to have had high regard for the city and its citizens, referring to them as<\/p>\n

\u2018the most sober, decent people in England, the genteelest in proportion to their wealth and spoke the purest English\u2019.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Johnson\u2019s craving for cosmopolitan fame and success is in utter contrast to Darwin, who more than once turned down the opportunity to become the Royal Physician in London. Darwin, one feels, was more comfortable in his own skin than Johnson (who has been posthumously diagnosed as suffering from Tourette\u2019s apparently, which can\u2019t have helped), more confident in his own merits, and more inclined to follow his interests where they would rather than because it would earn him plenty of money. Hence, an original inventor of many things (a speaking machine, an early pantograph, the basic idea underpinning modern axles and a horizontal windmill to name but a few) he never took out a single patent. His profession was medicine and he clearly feared that by revealing himself to be either an inventor or a poet he could damage that professional standing on which his income \u2013 which he most certainly did need for a very large family of children, both legitimate and illegitimate \u2013 depended. Yet he equally certainly was both, and for a while (once he had \u2018outed\u2019 himself as a poet) was regarded as the foremost poet of his age. He would appear to epitomise a Renaissance, or more accurately an Enlightenment Man. He was a Whig, who admired the spirit of the French Revolution and whose close circle within the Lunar Society<\/a> included many of the leading scientists (Priestley<\/a> and Watt<\/a>) and innovators\/manufacturers (Boulton<\/a> and Wedgwood<\/a>) of the day.<\/p>\n

The Seward family had interactions with both Darwin and Johnson. Canon Seward, a prebendary at the cathedral, was very influential in setting Darwin\u2019s medical practice on a firm footing when he first arrived in the city, although subsequently Darwin fell out with him on various counts. Seward\u2019s daughter Anna<\/a> was a close friend, who sought advice from Darwin on her poetry; indeed Darwin encouraged her rather against the wishes of her father (who clearly felt this was not a seemly activity for a young woman), but Darwin had strong and advanced views on female education summed up in his 1797 book A plan for the conduct of female education in boarding schools<\/em><\/a>. However, ultimately he may have left Anna feeling let down, by not asking her to be his second wife.\u00a0 The Seward\u2019s clearly knew Johnson and used to entertain him during his Lichfield visits, although Johnson was hardly complimentary about the Canon:<\/p>\n

\u2018Sir, he has ambition to be a fine talker; so goes to Buxton, and such places, where he may find company to listen to him\u2026\u2019.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Canon Seward had literary pretensions himself, having produced a new edition of Beaumont\u2019s plays. When Johnson produced an edition of Shakespeare, Darwin pilloried them both in verse:<\/p>\n

From Lichfield famed two giant critics come,
\nTremble, ye Poets! Hear them! \u2018Fe, fo fum!\u2019
\nBy Seward\u2019s arm the mangled Beaumont bled,
\nAnd Johnson grinds poor Shakespeare\u2019s bones for bread.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That being so, perhaps it is no surprise they did not get on when they subsequently met a couple of years later. Johnson was the older by some 22 years, and must have regarded himself at this point in his life as the<\/span> son of Lichfield made good (although his friend and erstwhile pupil David Garrick could also have claimed to fit that particular niche).\u00a0 He did not like returning to the town to find a local star, a polymath who had a growing national reputation and who could not be talked down. Anna Seward wrote in her biography:<\/p>\n

\u2018Mutual and strong dislike subsisted between them\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

and<\/p>\n

\u2018Johnson liked only worshippers\u2019\u2026.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Darwin and the Seward\u2019s were not of those who<\/p>\n

\u2018sunk, in servile silence, under the force of his dogmas\u2019.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Clearly there was a strong clash of personalities between two larger-than-life characters, neither of whom wished to give ground to the other, and who probably differed in their approaches to just about everything. Although I found my visit to Johnson\u2019s house the more interesting, maybe because I knew less about him in advance but also because the Erasmus Darwin house is largely aimed at children, my sympathies lie much more with the enlightened free-spirit of Darwin, keen on female education and with a general curiosity about everything, than the high Tory Johnson wishing to be liked and plauded wherever he went.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I have just spent a few days in Lichfield, which you might not think of as a key cultural centre, but it happens to be closely associated with two giants, in the form of Erasmus Darwin and Samuel Johnson, both … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[190],"tags":[486,191,195,485],"class_list":["post-2198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history-of-science","tag-anna-seward","tag-erasmus-darwin","tag-lichfield","tag-samuel-johnson"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2198"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2198\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}