{"id":4825,"date":"2015-12-06T09:49:43","date_gmt":"2015-12-06T08:49:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/?p=4825"},"modified":"2015-12-06T09:49:43","modified_gmt":"2015-12-06T08:49:43","slug":"just-say-no-but-how","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/2015\/12\/06\/just-say-no-but-how\/","title":{"rendered":"Just Say No (but How?)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of those persistent stereotypes-by-gender is that women are less good at saying no than men. Whether or not you believe that to be true, there is no doubt that many of us \u2013 myself included \u2013 are less than perfect at saying exactly what we mean. It is too easy to try to soften a rejection to the point that the listener, who may after all have an ulterior motive in not hearing \u2018no\u2019, doesn\u2019t appreciate that your refusal is exactly that. This is not confined to Early Career Researchers, a topic recently addressed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.timeshighereducation.com\/blog\/early-career-researchers-difficulty-saying-no-newbie?utm_source=hootsuite\">here<\/a>. We can all struggle unless incredibly resolute and clear.<\/p>\n<p>I probably first appreciated this lesson when a PhD student and found I had been assigned to help out in an undergraduate Electronics Lab. I could not imagine how this had happened, given I knew absolutely nothing about the subject (and to be honest didn\u2019t care overmuch). As it was my PhD supervisor who had had the job of assigning the task I asked him why he\u2019d done it. I thought it was some personal joke against me but no, he claimed to believe I\u2019d wanted to take the role on. I decided I must have said something along the lines of \u2018W<em>ell I know nothing about the subject and maybe it would be good if I did\u2019<\/em>, which had been translated as \u2018<em>It would be wonderful to have to learn these skills so please put me in a position where I have to<\/em>\u2019. I\u2019d like to think I had learned something from this, but I\u2019m sure I am still perfectly capable of weasel wording \u2018no\u2019 into something that can be translated as \u2018yes\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>Undoubtedly, very often not being clear is a mistake. It is true that sometimes one wants to be persuaded into some role. A response of \u2018<em>Oh not me, surely you don\u2019t think I could do XXX<\/em>\u2019 might indeed be modesty, false or otherwise, and the speaker really does mean \u2018<em>Please persuade me because it sounds awfully exciting but I feel nervous about it\u2019<\/em>. However, probably just as often, it may simply mean \u2018not me\u2019, but our inability to say something as bald as that may find us doing something that we neither want nor that it is in our interest to do. So, finding words with which we are comfortable to say no really matters.<\/p>\n<p>What those precise words should be will of course depend on context. I find people now write to me inviting me to speak at events in the tone of \u2018<em>num<\/em>\u2019 not \u2018<em>nonne<\/em>\u2019. For those who weren\u2019t exposed to years of Latin I should spell out that this means they write expecting a negative response rather than a positive one, using phrases implying they\u2019re sure I get lots of invitations and my diary is a nightmare (both true). Undoubtedly this makes it easier to say \u2018S<em>orry but no<\/em>\u2019, since I am merely confirming their expectations. However this is a recent development and it doesn\u2019t stop me feeling bad, even guilty, that I simply can\u2019t do everything. After all, I know some (but by no means all) of the things I turn down would be fascinating and valuable. But, whether or not people expect a \u2018no\u2019 answer, one has to bear in mind the opportunity cost of agreeing.<\/p>\n<p>So, here are some common situations you may want to consider.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Being asked to serve on a new committee:<br \/>\nIf this is a committee that interests you and your diary is bare of commitments you probably should say yes. Far too often, though, one is asked for all the wrong reasons, such as they know you\u2019ll turn up helping to make the meeting quorate and that you will take it seriously &#8211; but they don\u2019t actually want to listen to your views. You may already be overburdened anyhow. Useful, clear responses such as \u2018<em>I think the workload model already shows I am contributing far more hours than the departmental mean so I won\u2019t accept at this time<\/em>\u2019 or \u2018<em>If the department wants to see my research progress this is not the right time for me to take this on<\/em>\u2019 are called for.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Being asked to take on some other task such as admissions or pastoral care:<br \/>\nEither of the responses above may suffice. Do not be seduced by comments such as (if appropriate) \u2018<em>you\u2019d be so good at it \u2013 and we need a (wo)man in that role<\/em>.\u2019 You might also want to look, not just at the number of hours your colleagues work, but at the nature of the roles they are asked to do \u2013 and how they relate to promotion criteria. If you are dubious on this last point you may want to stress a variant of the second response reminding the supplicant of it, rather than simply reply on a total hours worked basis. You may ultimately need to state flatly \u2018<em> This is an unreasonable request.<\/em>\u2019 but that can feel very awkward.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Being asked to work with a colleague with whom you know there will be friction.<br \/>\nThis can sometimes happens within research groups where several students may be expected to contribute to a common project, or when equipment needs to be shared. This is much harder to reject without strong evidence. Simply saying that you don\u2019t like X is hardly a good strategy. It may take several efforts to put across why sharing equipment with X isn\u2019t going to be productive for anyone because they will simply be a dog-in-the-manger and the project won\u2019t progress (at least from your perspective). Starting from a base of \u2018<em>I have not always found X works collegially<\/em>\u2019 you may ultimately need to escalate to \u2018<em>I am not prepared to work with X<\/em>\u2019 \u2013 and then defend that position. If X is the supervisor\u2019s pet, this may of course require you to find a new supervisor in due course.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Being asked to do outreach.<br \/>\nMany of us want to do outreach; it\u2019s important and enjoyable to get into schools and enthuse the next generation of budding scientists and engineers. However, if you\u2019re good at it there is the danger it can take over your life and that people will expect you always to be willing to visit yet another school. I have devised my own strategy to cope. I have identified a radius beyond which I won\u2019t usually travel and if I turn down an invitation I will try to come up with an appropriate, but more local, name to offer. It may also make sense to decide in advance upon a total number of talks that you won\u2019t exceed in a year. Then it is easier to say \u2018<em>I\u2019m sorry, I have already done N talks this year and that\u2019s my limit<\/em>\u2019 \u2013 and stick to it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>We all get asked to do too many things. Deciding which ones to accept is likewise always a challenge. How do you know, however interesting a new task or role is, another one \u2013 even more interesting \u2013 may not land in your lap tomorrow? Nevertheless, it is crucial for one\u2019s career and sanity to set limits on what one accepts and to say no in completely unambiguous ways. Otherwise, there are many elephant traps to capture the unwary and unprepared.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of those persistent stereotypes-by-gender is that women are less good at saying no than men. Whether or not you believe that to be true, there is no doubt that many of us \u2013 myself included \u2013 are less than &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/2015\/12\/06\/just-say-no-but-how\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,5],"tags":[213,223],"class_list":["post-4825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research","category-science-culture","tag-committee-work","tag-outreach"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4825"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4825\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}