{"id":5347,"date":"2017-08-10T19:43:51","date_gmt":"2017-08-10T18:43:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/?p=5347"},"modified":"2017-08-10T19:43:51","modified_gmt":"2017-08-10T18:43:51","slug":"on-a-short-fuse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/2017\/08\/10\/on-a-short-fuse\/","title":{"rendered":"On a Short Fuse"},"content":{"rendered":"

I am frequently astonished by the chutzpah some people possess: the willingness brazenly to ask someone else essentially to do their own work so that they, the asker, can make cash. An email that smacked of this landed in my inbox recently. It told me that the sender, DH, was \u2018a writer (self-development + business) and contents planner<\/em>\u2019. He was intending to write a book<\/p>\n

\u2018aiming to collect and provide wisdom,\u00a0motivation\u00a0and inspiration\u00a0for readers,\u00a0giving them an opportunity to reflect on their lives. It would be my honor to have you in my book.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But by inclusion in his book what he actually meant was something along the lines of<\/p>\n

\u2018please will you write a chapter for me, and if I can get enough egotistical folk to want to be incorporated in a book in this way then I can write an introduction and a conclusion, palm it off on a publisher and raise some cash.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Vanity publishing indeed. I was not tempted. Indeed it just made me angry that someone thinks this is a respectable way to make a living. Since the guy told me he had already published 10 books \u2013 in South Korea \u2013 I assume it works.<\/p>\n

It is perhaps the case that I am on a short fuse at the moment. I realised this when, a day or two later I had an altercation with a taxi driver. I had cycled back to my home \u2013 the Master\u2019s Lodge at Churchill College \u2013 sadly pondering on the shocking way the trolls were after my friend and colleague Mary Beard<\/a> again. Trying to stick up for some academic rigour she has been attacked by a posse of internet trolls<\/a> for holding firm to the idea \u2013 and giving chapter and verse of evidence \u2013 that there were men of colour in Roman Britain.<\/p>\n

Whilst constantly challenging Mary to produce her credentials they, the opposition, seem content to argue along the lines of, fairly literally, \u2018my citation count is bigger than yours<\/em>\u2019, as if citations proved much. Or that remark didn\u2019t smack of the school playground bully. As scientists know only too well, you can get plenty of citations for being wrong. Being wrong, is after all, sometimes more interesting than being right. But it doesn\u2019t mean that you\u2019re either an expert or correct after all. I\u2019m not going to jab my finger at the twitterstorm\u2019s main protagonist Nicholas Taleb<\/a>. I admit I\u2019d never heard of him before though I was vaguely aware of his best-selling book Black Swan<\/em>. Interesting topic, made a great deal of; academic worth \u2013 no idea personally. I\u2019m not interested in his citation count. I am interested in, or rather I am utterly appalled by, his ability to be totally vicious and simultaneously vacuous within 140 characters on Twitter. I am concerned by why he thinks this is the mark of a good academic. Why he thinks it advances the debate on whether or not the Roman army was anything other than pure white. Mary on her own blog <\/a>has provided some concrete evidence, but I haven\u2019t seen a sensible response from her detractors. But then I might have missed something.<\/p>\n

It makes me very angry to watch her being attacked by many \u2013 although supported I suspect by many more \u2013 in ways that seem quite gratuitously unpleasant and misogynistic. No one calls a man an old bat, or tw@ or much much worse; the insults all seemed strongly gendered. So, having been pondering over the wanton insults and name-calling, I probably wasn\u2019t at my best when I got back to Churchill that day. Finding a taxi outside my home, knowing that it was not for me or for my husband, knowing that frequently the taxi companies get confused between the Master\u2019s Lodge (where only my husband and I live) and the Porter\u2019s Lodge, which is essentially the College\u2019s Reception and where students will expect to wait for taxis, I asked him who he was waiting for. His screen showed clearly that he had been sent to the Master\u2019s Lodge but for a person whose name was completely unfamiliar to me so I knew he had been sent to the wrong place.<\/p>\n

I tried to explain that to him, explained I was the Master and I certainly hadn\u2019t ordered that taxi. At which point he got shirty \u2013 although why he thought it was unhelpful of me to point him in the direction of where he\u2019d find his customer I don\u2019t know. His angry sentence ended up with the word \u2018darling\u2019. Red rag to a bull, I\u2019m afraid. On that particular day, having been pondering Mary\u2019s plight, I threw back at him (not politely I admit) \u2018don\u2019t call me darling\u2019. Things escalated from there with choice phrases from him along the lines of \u2018you\u2019re certainly not my darling\u2019 (so why did he call me one in the first place?) and further abuse. It ended up with another shout of \u2018darling\u2019 as he drove off. I have complained to his employer.<\/p>\n

It is utterly trivial yet also symptomatic of the way some men seem to think there is no need to treat women with respect. Darling in itself is merely demeaning. It\u2019s not threatening so perhaps I shouldn\u2019t care. But if he treats me like that, how might he treat a young female student who flagged his taxi down late at night? What respect does he show others? Tolerating such contempt strikes me as too close to giving him permission to attack the more vulnerable to a greater degree than his mere inappropriate language to me. (Was I supposed to be flattered to be called darling in the first place? What does go through their heads when they say things like that?)<\/p>\n

It\u2019s the second trivial incident recently that has got me fired up. The first was once more over Twitter in the wake of the BBC gender pay gap revelations<\/a>. Philip Hampton, as some people may recall, appeared to blame the women for their lower pay because they \u2018never asked\u2019 for a rise<\/a>. I tweeted \u2018Philip Hampton clearly doesn\u2019t understand you need to fix the system not the women\u2019 linking to this story. Some smart guy responded<\/p>\n

\u2018Sir Philip Hampton to you my dear\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Like Mary I attempted to be polite in my fury saying<\/p>\n

\u2018As a Dame myself I think I can skip the formality but you might want to reconsider calling me \u2018dear\u2019\u2019.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

To which this joker simply replied \u2018no\u2019. Clearly, a woman with an Honour is not worthy of being treated with respect although he expects that same woman to bow and scrape about others\u2019 knighthoods. I couldn\u2019t care less about people using my title, I\u2019d far rather be introduced as Professor than Dame. But I do hate being called \u2018dear\u2019, \u2018darling\u2019 or other random if meaningless terms of endearment by total strangers. Maybe I should have called this twitter joker \u2018laddie\u2019 and seen how he liked it, or the taxi driver \u2018boyo\u2019 or \u2018sunshine\u2019 –\u00a0 but one never thinks of such responses in time. I must find some suitable terms to have to hand the next time some idiot tries this on me again.<\/p>\n

Any suggestions of choice phrases?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I am frequently astonished by the chutzpah some people possess: the willingness brazenly to ask someone else essentially to do their own work so that they, the asker, can make cash. An email that smacked of this landed in my … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[1008,1166,1165],"class_list":["post-5347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-equality","tag-mary-beard","tag-name-calling","tag-philip-hampton"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5347","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5347"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5347\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}