{"id":6320,"date":"2022-04-03T09:50:54","date_gmt":"2022-04-03T08:50:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/?p=6320"},"modified":"2022-04-03T09:50:54","modified_gmt":"2022-04-03T08:50:54","slug":"the-human-face-of-the-carbon-queen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/2022\/04\/03\/the-human-face-of-the-carbon-queen\/","title":{"rendered":"The Human Face of the Carbon Queen"},"content":{"rendered":"

In my Twitter feed, there has been much publicity about the recent biography of US physicist and electrical engineer Millie Dresselhaus, Carbon Queen<\/a>, <\/em>by Maia Weinstock<\/a>. Dresselhaus\u2019 lifetime of research spanned over five decades, studying many different forms of carbon, from graphite to graphene via nanotubes. I never met Dresselhaus to my knowledge, though I find it hard to believe we didn\u2019t attend one of the huge APS meetings at the same time, but I believe I once met Weinstock at a meeting held at the Royal Society (although that may be an inaccurate memory). The book is an interesting read, and very easy to get stuck into. But more than the style, there are the stories about the life this remarkable woman led at a time when women were considerably thinner on the ground in Physics\/Electrical Engineering than they are now. For instance, she spent a year at Harvard taking science classes, because Radcliffe \u2013 where she was enrolled from 1952 \u2013 couldn\u2019t provide any teaching in the sciences. Of this time, she said (all her quotes are taken from the book):<\/p>\n

\u2018I felt a little odd because women were still very, very much in the minority, and in some classes I was the only one.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Furthermore, women<\/p>\n

\u2018had to take their exams together in the same room [i.e separately from the men] because their presence in a coed examination setting was thought too distracting for the men.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Her PhD supervisor (at the University of Chicago) felt that women had no place in science and told Dresselhaus so, indicating he believed giving women fellowships or other recognition was simply a \u2018waste of resources\u2019<\/em>. That attitude was probably not that unusual at the time, or indeed for many years thereafter, with Weinstock quoting a 1976 article on women in engineering (in Cosmopolitan) that claimed a department head had \u00a0said<\/p>\n

\u2018a lot of the technical education we\u2019re giving women today is going to be wasted. They\u2019ll get married, have children, and their period of productivity won\u2019t last more than a few years.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Dresselhaus got married \u2013 to a fellow researcher in the same broad discipline, with whom she collaborated extensively \u00a0\u2013 and had four children. Her career spanned more than fifty years of research at the top of her field. Despite that prediction about women in general, she barely stopped working even when she gave birth, taking only a few days off in total around her four children.<\/p>\n

In due course, Dresselhaus joined the MIT faculty, becoming a tenured professor in Electrical Engineering in 1968, the first woman to be appointed full professor in any of the engineering departments. (That fact doesn\u2019t surprise me: when I interviewed, and was subsequently offered, a faculty position in Cornell\u2019s Materials Science and Engineering Department in 1982, I would have become the first woman faculty in Engineering there had I gone. In the end, of course, I didn\u2019t go back to Cornell, where I had held two postdoc positions, and I don\u2019t know who did become that first woman there.) About her appointment she made a curious quote:<\/p>\n

\u2018I had very low expectations for myself. It wasn\u2019t until I became a full professor in the prestigious MIT electrical engineering department that I began to take my career seriously.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Was this a case of impostor syndrome, or simply a lack of role models to lead her to think that she too, as a woman, could make a go of a career? (Clearly role models would have been in short supply, although future Nobel Prize winner Rosalyn Yalow<\/a> had briefly taught her at college and given her much encouragement to persist, despite the difficulties for women at the time.) \u00a0It isn\u2019t obvious to me which interpretation is right, but make a go of it she did, publishing numerous trail-blazing papers and winning honours and other accolades throughout her life.<\/p>\n

In 1999 MIT produced a seminal and ground-breaking report: A Study of the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT<\/a> (I\u2019ve written about this report before<\/a>, at the time its follow-up was published in 2011). This report was prompted by the findings of molecular biologist Nancy Hopkins<\/a>, who explored gender differences in the allocation of various resources, as well as women\u2019s personal experiences. When I read this report in 1999, I realised how much the situation described echoed my own experiences, although I had not internalised that there were systemic biases at play, as opposed to (or, at least, in addition to) my own failings. The abstract to the report explicitly stated<\/p>\n

\u2018many tenured women faculty feel marginalized and excluded from a significant role in their departments. Marginalization increases as women progress through their careers at MIT.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That second sentence is very important in my eyes. Life does not necessarily get easier as you progress, although the issues a woman faces may alter over time and undoubtedly some women do have an easier time, not least, because they are less likely to suffer from sexual harassment, as someone spelled out to me recently. It is clear from the book that Dresselhaus\u2019s reaction to the report, at the time, was similar to mine; she wasn\u2019t involved in the study itself, since she was in the Faculty of Engineering. It made her realise that the problems she encountered were not simply of her making. An MIT alumna described her reaction:<\/p>\n

\u2018I saw her change her opinions as she began to recall incidents\u2026that she\u2019d previously managed to ignore. I think that sort of blindness had served a useful purpose for her in the first part of that career.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It stimulated her to recognize that she had a role to play in supporting the women around her, and that she did for the rest of her life. Weinstock\u2019s book makes clear just how much she did to encourage, mentor and sponsor younger women whose paths crossed hers, whether or not there was any formal connection. Not only with a wonderful reputation in research and teaching, she mentored many women on to success, as well as acting as an incredibly visible role model. \u00a0She seems to have run her research group rather like an extended family, with many social occasions to help her students along.<\/p>\n

Those generations of women who came after her in Physics\/Engineering owe her a huge debt, because she was so visible, so determined and so helpful. If you want to know more, I recommend this book.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In my Twitter feed, there has been much publicity about the recent biography of US physicist and electrical engineer Millie Dresselhaus, Carbon Queen, by Maia Weinstock. Dresselhaus\u2019 lifetime of research spanned over five decades, studying many different forms of carbon, … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,27],"tags":[1515,1514,250,1476],"class_list":["post-6320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research","category-women-in-science","tag-maia-weinstock","tag-millie-dresselhaus","tag-mit","tag-nancy-hopkins"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6320"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6320\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/athenedonald\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}