{"id":229,"date":"2009-05-22T20:08:52","date_gmt":"2009-05-22T18:08:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/2009\/05\/22\/misleading_headlines\/"},"modified":"2009-05-22T20:08:52","modified_gmt":"2009-05-22T18:08:52","slug":"misleading_headlines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/2009\/05\/22\/misleading_headlines\/","title":{"rendered":"Misleading Headlines"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If you&#8217;ve been following the British news, you&#8217;ll know that the main political parties aren&#8217;t popular, because they&#8217;ve been more concerned about the <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/uk_news\/england\/hampshire\/8060755.stm\">welfare of ducks<\/a> than of their constituents.  So how do you react to this headline in the Guardian?<\/p>\n<h2><a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/politics\/2009\/may\/22\/icm-poll-european-elections\">Quarter of voters set to reject main parties at EU elections, poll shows<\/a><\/h2>\n<p>Oh noes!  The public is turning away from the major parties!<br \/>\nErr, no.  Not if you can understand numbers.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nHere&#8217;s the numbers, in a pie chart:<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/static.guim.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2009\/5\/22\/1243002930052\/GuardianICM-poll-on-EU-el-001.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"460\" height=\"300\" \/><br \/>\nLook at the changes: Tories +3, Lib Dems +3, Labour +1. So they&#8217;ve <em>gained<\/em> about 7 points.  How is this reported?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMore than a quarter of voters are planning to reject the Westminster establishment in next month&#8217;s European elections, according to a new Guardian\/ICM poll carried out in the aftermath of the MPs&#8217; expenses scandal.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\nIt finds that some 27% of voters are already planning to support a minority party. The poll also uncovered evidence that more could soon join them.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\nThe results follow two weeks in which Labour, the Tories and the Liberal Democrats have been battered by the press and public over the publication of MPs&#8217; expenses.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8230; and yet they have still maintained their levels of support.  Oh wait, The Grauniad missed that bit.<br \/>\nOnly half-way down the story are we told that the major parties&#8217; support hasn&#8217;t slipped, and then only in a &#8220;well things could be worse&#8221; way:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nAmong the big parties, the Liberal Democrats are on 18% with the Conservatives set to take 30%. That is three points up on the Tories&#8217; performance in the 2004 Euro elections, but well below the party&#8217;s standing in Westminster polls at the moment, which is around 40%.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\nThere may be some relief in Labour circles that \u2013 while dreadful \u2013 its 24% share of the vote is no worse than the 23% that it took in 2004. The party&#8217;s high command had started to fear it could slip below the psychologically important 20% threshold, a rout which some are suggesting would trigger a challenge to Gordon Brown.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s a rather basic issue here.  Either Tom Clark, who is credited with the story, is innumerate, or he spinning so much he should work for the <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/notrocketscience\/2009\/05\/everything_changes.php\">palaeontology department at The History Channel<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you&#8217;ve been following the British news, you&#8217;ll know that the main political parties aren&#8217;t popular, because they&#8217;ve been more concerned about the welfare of ducks than of their constituents. So how do you react to this headline in the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/2009\/05\/22\/misleading_headlines\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/boboh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}