{"id":618,"date":"2007-05-23T20:53:26","date_gmt":"2007-05-23T20:53:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/2007\/05\/23\/in_which_the_focus_stubbornly_resists_narrowing\/"},"modified":"2007-05-23T20:53:26","modified_gmt":"2007-05-23T20:53:26","slug":"in_which_the_focus_stubbornly_resists_narrowing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/2007\/05\/23\/in_which_the_focus_stubbornly_resists_narrowing\/","title":{"rendered":"In which the focus stubbornly resists narrowing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>No, I can&#8217;t believe it either: exactly one week remains before I re-start my career as a bench scientist. In two day&#8217;s time I pack up my desk, bid a tearful, even maternal farewell to my lovely team of young editors and jump ship from science publishing. In the process, I leave behind a permanent position, a managerial role, a predicable career ladder and a comfortable salary. And next Thursday, I wash ashore at a lab in University College London, a newly-minted, badly out-of-practice post-doctoral fellow of molecular genetics with only eighteen months of not-quite-so-comfortable salary guaranteed. Beyond that, the aforementioned <a href=\"http:\/\/network.nature.com\/blogs\/user\/UE19877E8\/2007\/04\/25\/in-which-i-leap-into-the-void\">void<\/a> lurks, an omnipresent nothingness in which hardly anything is certain or predictable.<\/p>\n<p>\nTo be honest, though the thought of what happens when I get there, and of my long-term future, is making me sweat a little, what&#8217;s truly worrying is the grant application deadline looming just a day after I start. All 33 pages of it. More specifically, the 3,500 word research proposal forming the heart of this not inconsiderable document.<\/p>\n<p>\nFirst there are the stakes. This is a four-year fellowship, including a higher salary, travel and consumables. Eighteen months will pass in the blink of an eye, but with four years, I feel confident I can work out my next stepping-stone. As a non-EU citizen on a migrant visa who wants to remain on this fair island, and at my age (39), such considerations are not trivial. <\/p>\n<p>\nBut stakes aside, I seem to be as rusty with the grant-writing process itself as I most likely will prove to be with pipetting devices, microscope and gel apparatus next week. <\/p>\n<p>\nThis rustiness gradually became apparent a few months ago when I started brushing up on my new field. As a &#8216;civilian&#8217;, I was solely dependent on my future lab head to share his literature collection with me. Without a research affiliation, I am effectively the equivalent of a developing-world scientist. In the absence of a single subscription I rely on handouts; also, I find myself gravitating gratefully to the open access green fields of BioMed Central, Public Library of Science and Springer&#8217;s Open Choice. For many quick checks, I can only look at abstracts: frustrating.<\/p>\n<p>\nBut the real problem is a mental one. One of the main things you learn as a handling editor is to consider the big picture while more or less discarding the fine details. In essence, your brain becomes a highly trained, large-pore sieve through which the majority of items wash through. A scientific paper is a 6,000 word document of which only a small fraction really counts: the words that tell you <em>why<\/em> the authors chose to study their particular question; that tell you what, actually, is an advance over what is already known, and why we should care. An incredibly complicated document that must be assessed, digested and classified in a matter of minutes, and I can tell you that such an assessment leaves little room for registering, let along remembering, the little details.<\/p>\n<p>\nBut for a scientist, especially one writing a grant, the details are crucial. And initially, I found myself reading through papers with an editorial agenda, my mind automatically going to the default &#8216;skim&#8217; mode, eager to race ahead, to discard the acronyms and gene names and conditions in favor of the big picture. At first, I would have to read the same paragraph five times to retain even a fraction of the nitty-gritty. Over the days and weeks, grimly determined, I patiently retrained my brain to absorb like a scientist instead of an editor. I made lots of sketches and penned line after line of questions in the margins \u2013 used a highlighter pen as profligately as an undergraduate. I pestered my future lab head by email with silly questions (to his credit, he answered them all with swiftness and good humor). And then I started to write: hesitant paragraphs slowly growing more confident as I got to grips with what it is I want to achieve in a four-year research program. Little by little, the skills come back: hypotheses, controls, caveats, differential outcomes. <\/p>\n<p>\nAnd I suppose I am grateful that the grant deadline has made me address all this now.  Before I pick up that pipettor and perform my first experiment, I need not only to be manipulating reagents like a scientist, but actually <em>thinking<\/em> like one.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No, I can&#8217;t believe it either: exactly one week remains before I re-start my career as a bench scientist. In two day&#8217;s time I pack up my desk, bid a tearful, even maternal farewell to my lovely team of young &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/2007\/05\/23\/in_which_the_focus_stubbornly_resists_narrowing\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/mindthegap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}