{"id":1436,"date":"2012-02-17T19:36:52","date_gmt":"2012-02-18T01:36:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/?p=1436"},"modified":"2012-02-17T19:36:52","modified_gmt":"2012-02-18T01:36:52","slug":"who-says-scientists-arent-creative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/2012\/02\/17\/who-says-scientists-arent-creative\/","title":{"rendered":"Who says scientists aren&#8217;t creative?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the things that people tends to think about scientists is that we are all machine-like robots who are technically advanced, but without an ounce (or gram) of creativeness.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m planning in this brief blog to dispel this criticism with a few choice counterpoints, followed by &#8220;the mother-of-all-examples&#8221; from my own work. Yes, I am bragging, and you&#8217;ll see my creativeness if you bear with me.<\/p>\n<p>But first, OT and it&#8217;s bloggers and followers are a prime example of creativeness. Each blog is uniquely creative, thoughtful, didactic, scholarly, humbling and humorous. Or any combination of the above. And we are all scientists! There are authors, chess-players, film makers, photographers and artists among us. But if these examples still don&#8217;t convince you, how about this:<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve been suffering for a long time from a really awful e-mail system that our university is finally about to discard&#8211;known as &#8220;Lotus Notes.&#8221; It&#8217;s particularly poorly adapted for those of us who use Macintosh computers, although it&#8217;s not exactly a treat for PC users either. In any case, we are finally migrating in a few weeks to a new system called Microsoft Entourage, which is supposed to interface well for Macs. Whatever the case, it certainly can&#8217;t be worse than the current situation.<\/p>\n<p>Allow me to explain how lousy this &#8220;Notes&#8221; system really is: At home, outside of my &#8220;Client&#8221; or office computer, access is of course through the internet. In logging in to &#8220;Lotus Notes&#8221; I find that my inbox shows roughly the last 20 e-mails that have come in. Not unusual. But what if I want to retrieve and reply to an e-mail I received this morning, about 27 e-mails ago? Simple, silly. Just scroll down.<\/p>\n<p>What?! Or eh?! (for you Brtis and Canucks) How does one scroll down? Simple, just use the arrows or the mouse. Uhhh, but that doesn&#8217;t work. It doesn&#8217;t? Oh, well, go into the &#8220;Lite Mode&#8221; instead of the &#8220;Full Mode.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Problem solved! No! &#8220;Full Mode&#8221; doesn&#8217;t help one iota. Now let&#8217;s get creative! So my first creative solution was to click &#8220;command -&#8221; (apple minus) to decrease the font size. Hurray! Now I can get more e-mails on the page. But what if I need to go back 45 e-mails to reply to one? Make it smaller again. And again. See this period? (.) Well, it could be an entire letter&#8211;I can&#8217;t read it either. This method means you need a microscope to read your e-mails. perhaps a confocal, or electron microscope&#8230; Won&#8217;t do.<\/p>\n<p>Be creative! How can a scientist solve the problem?<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what I do: I find the e-mail (45 e-mails ago) on my BlackBerry, and forward it to myself. Now it appears at the very top of my &#8220;Lotus Notes&#8221; e-mail inbox. Brilliant, eh? Great use of my time. Lovely.<\/p>\n<p>So while I am excited about perhaps no longer having to depend on my own creative solutions to function from home and outside my work office, there is a catch: the new system will not work well with BlackBerry. That scares me for obvious reasons. However, it is supposed to be well coordinated with Iphones. So I may have to switch loyalties&#8211;never tried one of those new-fangled gizmos.<\/p>\n<p>Any comments or suggestions for a potential new Iphone buyer\/user?<\/p>\n<p>Be creative!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the things that people tends to think about scientists is that we are all machine-like robots who are technically advanced, but without an ounce (or gram) of creativeness. I&#8217;m planning in this brief blog to dispel this criticism &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/2012\/02\/17\/who-says-scientists-arent-creative\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[81,91,50],"tags":[125,56,619,620],"class_list":["post-1436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-humor","category-research","category-science","tag-blackberry","tag-creativity","tag-e-mail","tag-iphone"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1436"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}