{"id":2614,"date":"2014-09-20T16:17:56","date_gmt":"2014-09-20T21:17:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/?p=2614"},"modified":"2014-09-20T16:17:56","modified_gmt":"2014-09-20T21:17:56","slug":"unacceptable-science-education","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/2014\/09\/20\/unacceptable-science-education\/","title":{"rendered":"Unacceptable (science) education"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For some time now I have been a proponent of including researchers &#8211; for example, those with a Ph.D. &#8211; in teaching science to high school students. While I have no doubt that the inclusion of a motivated and talented body of researchers in secondary school education will be highly beneficial to all involved: high students students, the Ph.D.-holding teachers, and the entire scientific system, it was only recently that I became aware of how badly such a change is needed.<\/p>\n<p>I was recently asked to take a look at a worksheet on &#8220;The Cell&#8221; &#8211; essentially a two dimensional drawing of the cell and its many wondrous organelles and major structures &#8211; and I found the quality of the drawing to be so poor that even as an expert in cell biology with years of microscopy experience and looking at these very organelles, I could not even identify all of the structures.<\/p>\n<p>How embarrassing; the <em>Director<\/em>, no less, of the Advanced Microscopy Core facility at my institution, and unable to completely place all of the names on all of the structures on the worksheet.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"How not to teach biology by Evets1965, on Flickr\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/75744794@N03\/15114490428\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/farm4.staticflickr.com\/3884\/15114490428_fa5f032c78.jpg\" alt=\"How not to teach biology\" width=\"370\" height=\"500\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>The <em>microbody? <\/em>Give me a break&#8230;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In my defense, here is a copy of the weird worksheet. Particularly alarming was the use of the term &#8220;microbody&#8221; &#8211; a relict term from the 50s when researchers first used electron microscopy, and couldn&#8217;t accurately place a variety of small organelles. Certainly a useless and unused term in modern science (and by modern, I mean the last 40 years&#8230;). Why would it appear as a term to identify on a worksheet of &#8220;The Cell&#8221; in 2014? Why not use peroxisome? Endosome? How did this sheet even come to be used in an Advanced Placement course for high school biology in the US?<\/p>\n<p>In any case, with or without <em>microbodies, <\/em>the depiction of the cell as a static, 2-dimensional and stick-like series of structures (something that would be expected of a terrible artist such as myself if forced to draw) is not a particularly flattering picture of our secondary education system. Admittedly, I was impressed with the textbook and the relatively solid foundation in chemistry that I encountered.<\/p>\n<p>In today&#8217;s era of wonderful online tools, 3-dimensional movies &#8211; and yes, super-resolution microscopy (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/gp\/75744794@N03\/DJ3P48\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;trailer&#8221; for Structured Illumination Microscopy<\/a>, coming to a blog near you soon!) &#8211; much more can be done. Look at those lovely 3-dimensional Golgi stacks\/ribbons! Now <em>that&#8217;s<\/em> a cellular organelle!<\/p>\n<p>So what&#8217;s the problem? Let&#8217;s get well-qualified Ph.D. teachers into the system.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For some time now I have been a proponent of including researchers &#8211; for example, those with a Ph.D. &#8211; in teaching science to high school students. While I have no doubt that the inclusion of a motivated and talented &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/2014\/09\/20\/unacceptable-science-education\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,1110,91,50],"tags":[1127,1129,1125,1128,48,1131,1123,1133,1132,1130,1238,1236,1124,1134,597,1126],"class_list":["post-2614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education","category-education-education","category-research","category-science","tag-advanced-microscopy","tag-advanced-placement","tag-biology","tag-creative-teaching","tag-education-2","tag-golgi","tag-high-school","tag-microbody","tag-organelles","tag-ph-d-degree","tag-research","tag-science","tag-secondary-school","tag-super-resolution-microscopy","tag-teaching","tag-the-cell"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2614"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2614\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}