{"id":2909,"date":"2017-01-19T11:02:05","date_gmt":"2017-01-19T17:02:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/?p=2909"},"modified":"2017-01-19T11:02:05","modified_gmt":"2017-01-19T17:02:05","slug":"no-escape-from-the-geeky-scientist-phenotype-or-is-that-stereotype","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/2017\/01\/19\/no-escape-from-the-geeky-scientist-phenotype-or-is-that-stereotype\/","title":{"rendered":"No escape from the geeky scientist phenotype&#8211;or is that stereotype?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a title=\"Slide1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/60661816@N02\/32366822836\/in\/dateposted-public\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/c1.staticflickr.com\/1\/351\/32366822836_2933f6fa18_b.jpg\" alt=\"Slide1\" width=\"338\" height=\"254\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"st\"><em>Professor John Nerdelbaum Frink, Jr., scientist from &#8220;The Simpsons.&#8221; A familiar stereotype.<\/em><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p>For years I\u2019ve been trying to combat the misconception that all scientists are, generally speaking, a geekish bunch who have little or no interest in anything but their own miniscule scientific worlds. Such a perception has been trumpeted in films, the media, and books, and has been challenged to some extent by those of us who try to portray scientists as ordinary people\u2014albeit in extraordinary careers (author\u2019s view!).<\/p>\n<p>For this reason, I became incensed several days ago as I listened to music on \u201cSpotify\u201d during my morning exercise routine. An advertisement for the Exxon oil company popped up. As an aside, do they really need to advertise? For what? So people will pull into their gas stations and purchase their gasoline? Hard to imagine. To drum up public support for Trump\u2019s Secretary of State nominee and former Exxon CEO, Rex Tillerson? Who knows\u2026 What really irritated me was the stereotypical depiction of scientists\u2014not brave seekers of truth and explorers of new worlds\u2014but as geeks.<\/p>\n<p>The advertisement starts with the announcer noting that \u201c<em>This is the sound of seven Exxon scientists hard at work<\/em>.\u201d There is, of course, no sound. The scientists must be focused exclusively on their impossible-to-understand-for-normal-folks work, and patronized as those idiots that none of us would want to be, but necessary fools to keep things moving. The announcer goes on to say \u201c<em>They sure know how to party<\/em>,\u201d further distancing the listening public from those introverted fools, until one of the scientists utters an irritated \u201c<em>Shhhhh<\/em>\u201d in the background.<\/p>\n<p>Some might conclude that this is a flattering depiction of brilliant scientists hard at work for the good of&#8211;well&#8211;for the good of an oil company. I do not. Such depictions neither portray scientists accurately, nor in a positive light. They do not foment empathy with scientists and science, and only serve to further distance the general public from science. It&#8217;s time for scientists to take a stand and reject such stereotypes. Otherwise how can we convince the general public of the importance of scientific progress, not to mention the integrity and understanding that science is the frontier of truth&#8211;with a characterization of bumbling, doddering introverted fools?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Professor John Nerdelbaum Frink, Jr., scientist from &#8220;The Simpsons.&#8221; A familiar stereotype. For years I\u2019ve been trying to combat the misconception that all scientists are, generally speaking, a geekish bunch who have little or no interest in anything but their &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/2017\/01\/19\/no-escape-from-the-geeky-scientist-phenotype-or-is-that-stereotype\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[81,91,50],"tags":[1365,1363,1360,1364,1359,1367,492,1362,1366,1361],"class_list":["post-2909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-humor","category-research","category-science","tag-doddering-fools","tag-exxon","tag-geek","tag-intoverts","tag-nerd","tag-phenotype","tag-scientist","tag-spotify","tag-stereotype","tag-the-simpsons"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/stevecaplan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}