By nature and training, most biomedical research scientists are reductionists. For those non-scientists who are reading this, what I mean is that organisms and cells are so complex, with so many things going on simultaneously, that it is extremely difficult to attribute cause and effect to any singular factors. To do so, many scientists \u201cbreak things down\u201d to simple systems: we use the bare minimum of factors thrown together in a \u201ctest tube\u201d so that we can specifically determine what impacts what. Normally this is a solid approach\u2014but it doesn\u2019t work for everything.<\/p>\n
For example, the reductionist approach is not viable for understanding why women, who are entering biomedical science in numbers that approach or even exceed the number of men, are still not achieving parity with men beyond graduate training. It does not explain why fewer women succeed as post-doctoral fellows, go on to faculty positions, and climb the ladder to full professorship. Yes, it is a complex issue with many factors, and yes, there are many possible (although not necessarily acceptable) explanations. But we must not adhere to a reductionist approach.<\/p>\n
Last evening in Council Bluffs, Iowa, just across the Missouri River from my city of Omaha, Nebraska, the president of the United States, arguably the most scientifically developed country in the world, presided over a rally where people\u2014including many women\u2014were raving and chanting \u201cLock her up, Lock her up!\u201d Who is \u201cher<\/em>? In this case, probably Senator Diane Feinstein, who Trump falsely accuses of having leaked the letter from Dr. Blasey Ford accusing the newest Supreme Court judge of sexual assault. But the \u201cher<\/em>\u201d is more ominous than Senator Feinstein, or Hilary Clinton, the other frequently attacked woman in the \u201cLock her up!\u201d chants. It is a generic\u00a0<\/em>HER<\/strong>. That HER\u00a0<\/strong>represents every women who has ever been mocked, abused, mimicked or bad-mouthed by this president. Or any woman who has publicly disagreed with him.<\/p>\n It makes no difference that one by one, those surrounding Trump are being investigated, pleading guilty, cutting deals with the special counsel and prosecution, and earning jail terms. Just as it makes no difference how successful young women are in science, and in what numbers they are entering the biomedical workforce. What matters is the principle. <\/em>What matters is that the supposed role model for the US and the world is disparaging women\u2014specifically\u00a0<\/strong>women (okay, and minorities of all sorts as well)\u2014for the sole purpose of repressing. Pushing the old order. The male-dominated order. Male victims. White victims. And while one can somehow<\/em>envision how a certain type of older white male might be attracted to this type of populist garbage, I am appalled at how many women don\u2019t see through it.<\/p>\n Yes, new polls are showing that in record numbers, women are appalled by what is going on. Roughly two-thirds of the women in the country are deeply upset by what is happening\u2014regardless of politics. One can still be an avid conservative and be appalled by the attacks on women. Or so I\u2019d like to hope. But one cannot support this president and be a supporter of women\u2019s rights. That would be a complete contradiction in terms. Unless you believe in \u201cAlternative Facts.\u201d<\/p>\n It\u2019s time for the American public, and particularly American women, to take charge. We need a female president and female vice president. We need female congresswomen and female senators. And we need respect for women. Only once this occurs, will we be able to really properly push forward women in science. I\u2019ve done my bit and submitted my early ballot for Kara Eastman, democratic representative of Nebraska\u2019s 2nd\u00a0<\/sup>District, and sent a campaign donation. I call on all those who are able to vote in this crucial election\u2014please get out and vote.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" By nature and training, most biomedical research scientists are reductionists. For those non-scientists who are reading this, what I mean is that organisms and cells are so complex, with so many things going on simultaneously, that it is extremely difficult … Continue reading