{"id":274,"date":"2010-06-03T09:00:42","date_gmt":"2010-06-03T09:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sylviamclain.wordpress.com\/?p=274"},"modified":"2010-06-03T09:00:42","modified_gmt":"2010-06-03T09:00:42","slug":"monkeys-cant-take-their-booze","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/2010\/06\/03\/monkeys-cant-take-their-booze\/","title":{"rendered":"Monkeys can&#8217;t take their booze"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>and neither can adolescents&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>IT WILL ROT YOUR BRAIN<\/p>\n<p>New Scientist reports in an article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/dn18999-binge-drinking-rots-teen-brains.html\">Binge Drinking Rots Teenage Brains<\/a> that if you binge drink as a teen, your stem cells are going to die and you will have lasting damage to your spatial and memory thought functions (space and damn what was I saying?) <\/p>\n<p>They found this out after feeding adolescent monkeys alcohol daily over 11 months and then doing an autopsy on their brains 2 months later. <\/p>\n<p>Is doing an autopsy after 2 months really proof of lasting damage?<br \/>\nI would say no &#8211; but hey maybe I am wrong <\/p>\n<p>In this article this research:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/dn18999-binge-drinking-rots-teen-brains.html\">&#8230;. reinforces the rationale for anti-alcohol policies in the US and elsewhere which aim to raise the age at with people start to drink.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>First of all I am not advocating youthful (or any) binge drinking&#8230; but this is not really a good direct link&#8230;  The damage may or may not be lasting from tippling human teens BUT from this article it isn&#8217;t clear to me that your brain won&#8217;t recover and that the damage is truly lasting. They didn&#8217;t give the little monkeys time to shake it off and see how they grew into adulthood<\/p>\n<p>Using these kind of studies to support why kid&#8217;s shouldn&#8217;t drink, doesn&#8217;t work.  It never has, its like Nancy Reagan&#8217;s just say No campaign &#8211; that didn&#8217;t work either.  <\/p>\n<p>Or the<br \/>\nThis is your brain on drugs add in the US from the late 1980&#8217;s&#8230;<br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.drugfree.org\/image.ashx?id=df9df9d5-9b4c-48d2-8fb7-318d978a528a&amp;nocache=0415279e-31e2-4709-a231-d3daef1edf24\" alt=\"brain on drugs\" \/> <\/p>\n<p>this doesn&#8217;t work either &#8211;<br \/>\nWhy doesn&#8217;t it work? <\/p>\n<p> Because usually these kinds of campaigns are either based on some kind of psuedoscience or on faulty scientific reporting. Or worse, as in the present case, it&#8217;s based on exaggerating some real scientific results, making them appear to have a much stronger causal link than they actually do. <\/p>\n<p>Its not that I think you shouldn&#8217;t campaign against the use of drugs in teens or anyone else for that matter, but at least try to be more realistic about it, and don&#8217;t use scientific tactics unless they are reasonably presented. This not only doesn&#8217;t help anyone stop binge drinking but it gives scientific evidence a bad name.  <\/p>\n<p>Science reported in this fear-mongering kind of way can come back and bite you in the face.  Why?  Because its over-egging the pudding.  And people aren&#8217;t stupid &#8211; when they find out it isn&#8217;t necessarily or completely true, then its easy to reject the scientific bases altogether.   <\/p>\n<p>Its easy for people to distrust what scientists say or rather what is reported that scientists say, when there are over-arching conclusions about why something is bad for you.  And it doesn&#8217;t help to increase scientific literacy, or help stop binge drinking in teenagers or monkeys for that matter. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>and neither can adolescents&#8230; IT WILL ROT YOUR BRAIN New Scientist reports in an article Binge Drinking Rots Teenage Brains that if you binge drink as a teen, your stem cells are going to die and you will have lasting &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/2010\/06\/03\/monkeys-cant-take-their-booze\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,37,1],"tags":[293,109],"class_list":["post-274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drugs","category-random","category-uncategorized","tag-drugs","tag-scientific-literacy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}