{"id":2742,"date":"2017-01-29T15:45:37","date_gmt":"2017-01-29T15:45:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/?p=2742"},"modified":"2017-01-31T10:56:54","modified_gmt":"2017-01-31T10:56:54","slug":"the-president-needs-a-civics-lesson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/2017\/01\/29\/the-president-needs-a-civics-lesson\/","title":{"rendered":"The president needs a civics lesson"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>President Trump needs a civics lesson.  First I would suggest that he reads the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution.  I know this might be hard for a president <a href=\"https:\/\/newrepublic.com\/minutes\/133566\/donald-trump-doesnt-read-books\" target=\"_blank\">who doesn&#8217;t read<\/a>, but it&#8217;s a short read.  Alternately, he could maybe request that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/shows\/the-oreilly-factor.html\" target=\"_blank\">Bill O&#8217;Reilly<\/a> read it out loud on his show if this is easier for him.  <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn-images-1.medium.com\/max\/800\/1*tlLZaXE3vgcqaWTdVKbstQ.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"60%\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is the 1st Amendment (The 1st Article in the Bill of Rights):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There are a few things in there he might need to learn: <\/p>\n<p>1 &#8211; <em>Congress shall make no law<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Congress makes laws, not the president.  The law of the land is set by the Legislative branch, not the Executive branch.  The law of the land is upheld by the Judiciary branch, not the Executive branch.   <\/p>\n<p>2 &#8211; <em>no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Trump&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.star-telegram.com\/news\/nation-world\/article129289579.html\" target=\"_blank\">proclaimed &#8216;priority&#8217; to Christian refugees<\/a> over Muslim ones is dangerously close to being violation of this. <\/p>\n<p>I can imagine someone saying, &#8220;well they are refugees not American citizens&#8221;, but what the president is proposing is discriminating AGAINST someone based on their religion.  This Implies there must be some kind of religious test to know whether or not your immigrants are your &#8216;selected&#8217; religion&#8217; or not.  This is against the 1st amendment.  Discrimination of refugees based on where they are from is also against the law of the land in America set by Congress in 1965 &#8211; namely <a href=\"http:\/\/www.history.com\/topics\/us-immigration-since-1965\" target=\"_blank\">the Hart-Cellar Act<\/a> which abolished the <a href=\"https:\/\/history.state.gov\/milestones\/1921-1936\/immigration-act\" target=\"_blank\">national-origin quota system<\/a> set up in 1924. The president either doesn&#8217;t know that it is illegal to discriminate based on country of origin for immigration, or he doesn&#8217;t care and thinks he is above this law.  Let&#8217;s hope it is the former. <\/p>\n<p>In the main, Congress doesn&#8217;t take kindly to the ill-treatment of any American.  The Patriot Act &#8211; which was established directly after 9\/11 &#8211; gave the president more powers than he usually has (I am strongly biased AGAINST the Patriot Act, I think it in itself was unconstitutional) <a href=\"http:\/\/edition.cnn.com\/2015\/05\/30\/politics\/what-happens-if-the-patriot-act-provisions-expire\/\" target=\"_blank\">most of which have now expired<\/a>  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gpo.gov\/fdsys\/pkg\/BILLS-107hr3162enr\/pdf\/BILLS-107hr3162enr.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"> states the following <\/a> :<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>SEC. 102. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONDEMNING DISCRIMINATION<br \/>\nAGAINST ARAB AND MUSLIM AMERICANS.<br \/>\n(a) FINDINGS.\u2014Congress makes the following findings:<br \/>\n(1) Arab Americans, Muslim Americans, and Americans<br \/>\nfrom South Asia play a vital role in our Nation and are entitled<br \/>\nto nothing less than the full rights of every American.<br \/>\n(2) The acts of violence that have been taken against Arab<br \/>\nand Muslim Americans since the September 11, 2001, attacks<br \/>\nagainst the United States should be and are condemned by<br \/>\nall Americans who value freedom.<br \/>\n(3) The concept of individual responsibility for wrongdoing<br \/>\nis sacrosanct in American society, and applies equally to all<br \/>\nreligious, racial, and ethnic groups.<br \/>\n(4) When American citizens commit acts of violence against<br \/>\nthose who are, or are perceived to be, of Arab or Muslim<br \/>\ndescent, they should be punished to the full extent of the<br \/>\nlaw.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It almost makes me wish the Patriot Act was back, because it is clear that the president is in violation of it, very minimally because the concept of individual responsibility is sacrosanct in American society.  But not to the president, it appears, he is happy to blame whole countries of people, who are fleeing the individuals that are actually responsible for both domestic and international terrorism. <\/p>\n<p> President Trump is not the only president to issue executive orders that are in violation of the law of the land and that over-reach executive power, <em>The Washington Post<\/em> has an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/reality-check-many-of-trumps-early-vows-will-never-actually-happen\/2017\/01\/26\/2d56bfda-e3e3-11e6-879b-356663383f1b_story.html?utm_term=.66d6522eb85c\" target=\"_blank\">excellent article<\/a> on this.  This, however, is largely besides the point at this juncture because Trump is the president NOW, and he is acting NOW.<\/p>\n<p>While I am apoplectic about my president&#8217;s actions, I am proud to be an American. I believe in our system of government and our checks and balances are starting to work &#8211; faster than I thought they would:<\/p>\n<p>Friday (Jan 27th 2017), Trump signs an executive order which includes <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/national-security\/316599-trump-signs-order-to-vet-refugees\" target=\"_blank\"><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>a 90-day ban on entry to the U.S. for visitors hailing from `countries of particular concern\u201d when it comes to terrorism. The ban would apply to seven Muslim-majority countries: Iran, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Yemen and Iraq<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Saturday (Jan 28th 2017): people with valid visas were detained at the airport<\/p>\n<p>Saturday (Jan 28th 2017) part II: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/news\/federal-court-grants-stay-challenge-trump-immigration-ban\" target=\"_blank\">American Civil Liberties Union<\/a> goes to court on behalf of the detainees and  <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/blog\/president-trumps-first-week-aclu-hands-him-first-stinging-rebuke\" target=\"_blank\"><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Federal District Court Judge Ann M. Donnelly issued a stay, blocking President Trump\u2019s discriminatory policy from taking effect and preventing refugees and immigrants from being deported. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This is not over.  There are still people stranded outside the US who legally reside in the US because of this unconstitutional move on the President&#8217;s part. The Judge&#8217;s order only covered the folks currently in transit and as such it&#8217;s only a first step.  This deplorable action (in my opinion) by our executive branch is continuing to cause damage and likely <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/david-petraeus-anti-muslim-bigotry-aids-islamist-terrorists\/2016\/05\/12\/5ab50740-16aa-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html?utm_term=.c15a2b0e569d\" target=\"_blank\">will cause damage into the future<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p>As citizen of the US, I have the right to say all of this.  I have the right to speak out against this.  This fundamental right is ensconced in the US Constitution.  I have the right to free speech.  I also have the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.  Americans are using that right.  People are protesting (mostly non-violently) &#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/house-abandons-ethics-plan-8e321ae246c8#.qo3g326c0\" target=\"_blank\">calling<\/a> their representatives and senators <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/homenews\/administration\/316321-anti-devos-calls-jam-senate-phone-lines\" target=\"_blank\">in unprecedented numbers<\/a>  &#8211; as they should when they believe the government is doing the wrong thing.  It is the 1st amendment of the US Constitution that gives us this right. President Trump would do well to remember this. <\/p>\n<p>These are the things that make America great &#8211; our Constitution, Americans standing up to say this is not the America I want.  Our country was built on immigration, the president himself has strong ties to immigration &#8211; his mother was an immigrant, his wife (and his ex-wife) is an immigrant.  Increasing diversity, tolerance and ensuring equal opportunity for all citizens and soon-to-be citizens is what makes America truly great, and that is what I will try my utmost to help maintain. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>President Trump needs a civics lesson. First I would suggest that he reads the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution. I know this might be hard for a president who doesn&#8217;t read, but it&#8217;s a short read. Alternately, he could &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/2017\/01\/29\/the-president-needs-a-civics-lesson\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[354,355],"tags":[358,357,356],"class_list":["post-2742","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-1st-amendment","category-trump-executive-order","tag-1st-amendment","tag-muslim-ban","tag-trump"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2742","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2742"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2742\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/sylviamclain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}