{"id":254,"date":"2009-07-08T16:46:40","date_gmt":"2009-07-08T16:46:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/2009\/07\/08\/research_information_for_life_sciences\/"},"modified":"2009-07-08T16:46:40","modified_gmt":"2009-07-08T16:46:40","slug":"research_information_for_life_sciences","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/2009\/07\/08\/research_information_for_life_sciences\/","title":{"rendered":"Research (information) for life (sciences)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The name <a href=\"http:\/\/www.research4life.org\">Research4Life<\/a> sounds to me like a funding agency programme, with a twist of textspeak thrown in to make it cool.  In fact it is simply a rebranding exercise for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.who.int\/hinari\/\">HINARI<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aginternetwork.org\/en\/\">AGORA<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oaresciences.org\/\">OARE<\/a>. On balance I think I prefer Research4Life to that unwieldy bunch of acronyms &#8211; OARE especially is hard to pronounce without making it sound like a piratical utterance!<br \/>\nThese three schemes provide free access, for researchers at institutions in some of the world&#8217;s poorest countries, to over 7,000 journals provided by many of the world\u2019s leading scholarly publishers.<br \/>\nThe <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pspcentral.org\/commPublicAffairs\/Research4Life.cfm\">rebranding<\/a> took place a few weeks back but I only caught up with it at the WCSJ and a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biochemist.org\/news\/page.htm?item=35660\">news story<\/a> that claimed a massive increase in research output by scientists in the developing world since 2002, when HINARI was launched. That&#8217;s a nice correlation.<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s easy for those of a cynical bent (and I admit I am one of those) to imagine that these initiatives are really a fig-leaf for publishers to defend themselves against the charge that their journals are unaffordable to researchers in the developing world. I suspect that may indeed be the reason that publishers have signed up to these schemes, plus the realisation that providing free access to someone who couldn&#8217;t afford to subscribe anyway is not eroding your business model. But the original impetus came from NGOs working to provide health information to developing countries. I used to dabble in that area and went to a number of meetings in 2000\/2001 where HINARI was discussed.<br \/>\nHINARI was the first of the three schemes, covering health and biomedical sciences.  It grew out of the United Nations Millennium Action Plan as a way to provide a public health portal on the Internet for developing countries. This was called Health Internetwork.  I recall discussions in 2000 about it, but I&#8217;m a bit hazy on the detail now.  Somewhere along the way the WHO became involved and it became Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative (HINARI).<br \/>\nThe popularity of HINARI led to the development of AGORA (for agricultural and food journals) and OARE (for environmental journals).  I wonder whether the scheme under its new brand may expand further to cover other subject areas like engineering, economics and education.<br \/>\nI was interested to learn that some countries have &#8220;graduated&#8221; out of eligibility for HINARI etc.  I was told that publishers work with local consortia in those cases to try and put suitable deals in place to provide continued access on a subscription basis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The name Research4Life sounds to me like a funding agency programme, with a twist of textspeak thrown in to make it cool. In fact it is simply a rebranding exercise for HINARI, AGORA and OARE. On balance I think I &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/2009\/07\/08\/research_information_for_life_sciences\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}