![\"LinkedIn](\"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/trading-knowledge\/files\/2025\/10\/LI-Logo.png\"){kind=logo}
<\/a><\/p>\nIntroduction to LinkedIn<\/h3>\n
In some ways LinkedIn is just like other social media platforms: members have a profile and they can post stuff. But in addition LinkedIn has a defined purpose<\/strong>. Its mission is:<\/p>\n I think this sets it apart from other general social media sites.<\/p>\n It’s not the biggest social media platform but it is substantial. Launched in 2003 it has nearly 1 billion users across more than 200 countries and territories.\u00a0 300 million of those are classed as ‘monthly active users’. In its basic form it is free to use, but you can pay for a premium subscription. Since 2016 LinkedIn has been owned by Microsoft.<\/p>\n The biggest reason for using it is job seeking\/recruiting, with knowledge sharing\/professional networking a close second. Businesses and freelancers use it to advertise and reach customers. It’s also used for data mining.<\/p>\n You are probably already a user of LinkedIn, or at least have an account there. One estimate said that there are 45 million users in the UK, which I find hard to believe.<\/p>\n I have posted job vacancies on LinkedIn, but never used it to look for jobs myself. A couple of times I’ve been contacted through LinkedIn by job agencies. I think the premium subscriptions<\/a> can be useful if you’re seriously jobhunting, giving you additional features and communication options. For recruiters too there is a premium service that would be worth it if you are hiring frequently.<\/p>\n One source<\/a> says that 65 million people search for jobs on LinkedIn each week and there are more than 12 million applications through the site daily. Over three million new hires each year owe something to LinkedIn. The number of job adverts on LinkedIn is ever-changing, but I’ve read one estimate that there are 14 million open jobs there. I’ve also read that up to 60% of job postings there may be fake, so be warned.<\/p>\n Some people use LinkedIn for data mining<\/a>, either by simple web-scraping or by paying for access to the LinkedIn API.\u00a0 You can use it for \u00a0general market research, trend analysis or competitor analysis, or for lead generation. The huge volume of data in LinkedIn also attracts academic researchers. I heard a very interesting talk from someone who\u2019d carried out diversity research using LinkedIn data (eg proportion of women working in IT).<\/p>\n Who are the site’s users? There are personal accounts (individual users) and corporate accounts (businesses).\u00a0 It is reported that<\/a> 57% of LinkedIn users are male and 43% are female.\u00a0 Nearly 60% are aged 25-34, and 78% are outside the USA. Plenty more statistics are available about the geographical spread<\/a> and extent of usage in different industries<\/a>.<\/p>\n Your profile on LinkedIn is closely tied with your professional profile and employer, so there’s a strong incentive to behave<\/strong>. In my experience people on LinkedIn are reasonably well-behaved, but your mileage may vary.\u00a0 Much genuinely useful and interesting information is shared, though sometimes it comes across as ‘look at me’ or ‘hire me!’ or ‘buy my product’. Posts about career milestones (promotions, new jobs etc) will usually generate many congratulatory comments that are more about social connection than anything else.<\/p>\n There are also groups – these are sometimes linked with real world groups. They can help you to reach beyond your immediate network.<\/p>\n Your timeline is created partly by who you follow and partly by the LinkedIn algorithm<\/a>. That\u2019s a recommendation system that decides which posts appear in each user\u2019s news feed.\u00a0 It filters and ranks content so that your feed is filled with posts that are interesting and relevant to you. It doesn\u2019t have the problems associated with some other platforms\u00a0 and LinkedIn explicitly says the platform \u201cis not designed for virality\u201d<\/strong>. I think that’s very important.<\/p>\n Sourcegeek<\/a> says there are three main elements to the algorithm:<\/p>\n Screenshot<\/p><\/div>\n If you want advice on how to get better engagement on LinkedIn you can read a 123-page report<\/a> about the algorithm, full of tips.<\/p>\n I joined LinkedIn in 2006, just because it seemed like something worth exploring and various people I knew had joined. It had a very pushy email invite system back then so it was hard to avoid. Once a few people in your circle had joined up you kept receiving invitations to join up too. I’m not sure if they still do all of that.<\/p>\n I wasn’t looking to change job so actually I used it very little at first. At some point I noticed that people were posting announcements and small articles. Some of these generated comments, even discussions, so LinkedIn became a place I visited to read stuff. Much more recently the changes at Twitter\/X pushed more people to post content on LinkedIn instead of Twitter.<\/p>\n For me, with interests in research libraries, scholarly publishing, research culture, workplace wellbeing and DEI, I’ve found LinkedIn has plenty of content of interest.<\/p>\n I also use it to find out about people. Quite often when I search a person’s name in a general search engine their LinkedIn profile is among the top results. The profiles on LinkedIn include educational background and work experience, and the profile summary for a person highlights their recent posts and comments on LinkedIn so it’s good for giving you a quick impression of who they are.<\/p>\n Its three main income streams are adverts, premium personal subscriptions and recruiter subscriptions. It was expected to generate $6.79 billion through advertising in 2024. It generated $17.1 billion revenue<\/a> in 2024, an increase of 8.6% year-on-year.<\/p>\n It has grown from a small site that let you post your CV online into a large multifaceted website. Here are a few significant mileposts in its development<\/a>.<\/p>\n At our meeting someone commented that it had a reputation of being a bit boring, and I guess that’s true – it doesn’t court controversy and users tend to be focused on their work and professional interests to a large degree.\u00a0 But that is also its secret strength I think.<\/p>\n I\u2019m a member of my local U3A branch\u2019s social media group. A few of us meet regularly to learn about social media and associated topics, taking turns to present. This week I gave a talk about LinkedIn. I don\u2019t really … Continue reading To connect the world\u2019s professionals, so \r\nthey can be more productive and successful<\/pre>\n
Jobs<\/h3>\n
Data mining<\/h3>\n
The users<\/h3>\n
Knowledge sharing – your timeline – the algorithm<\/h3>\n
<\/a>LinkedIn and me<\/h3>\n
LinkedIn is a successful business<\/h3>\n
\n
Boring but sensible<\/h3>\n
<\/h3>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"