{"id":199,"date":"2008-06-05T02:11:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-05T02:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/vwxynot\/2008\/06\/05\/expertise-the-first-few-steps\/"},"modified":"2008-06-05T02:11:00","modified_gmt":"2008-06-05T02:11:00","slug":"expertise-the-first-few-steps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occamstypewriter.org\/vwxynot\/2008\/06\/05\/expertise-the-first-few-steps\/","title":{"rendered":"Expertise: the first few steps"},"content":{"rendered":"

Being a newbie SUCKS. I mean, it’s exciting and fresh and new, but you have to depend on other people all the time, which I hate. I’ve badgered colleagues in my department (and in others) with endless questions, my supervisor still has to check every piece of work I do, I second-guess myself all the time, and expend huge<\/strong> amounts of energy just keeping up with the new processes, terminology, literature and politics. I did my usual trick of turning into a total zombie for the first few weeks of the new job, mitigated slightly by the fact that I’d worked for the same organisation (and partially in the same building) as a postdoc from 2002 – 2005. Even now, 7 months in, things are still not as easy as they were at my last job, where people came to me <\/strong>with their endless questions.<\/p>\n

But this week seemed to mark the turning of a corner. An admin assistant in a different department sent a group of us a long email with lots of questions about submitting grants to a particular funding body – and I was able to answer them all! (This is the funding body I’ve submitted to twice since starting the job, with one success<\/a> and one decision pending). This prowess naturally got me invited to a big meeting yesterday, at which I was able to amaze the assembled bigwigs with my stunning revelations (i.e. I told them how the application process works; what the paylines are this year (6%); what aspects of our previous submissions the reviewers liked and didn’t like; and suggested that they use American spelling <\/a>and stress the few advantages of a Canadian submission over US competitors). This morning I sent them some of our text to work from, and got them started on the local human ethics application. They’re working in a different area of research to my department, but with overlapping staff, technologies, resources and facilities, so some of the people who matter (i.e. decide my fate next November) know that I was involved, which can only be a good thing.<\/p>\n

Later on, I received a phone call from a grant facilitator at UBC who’d heard a rumour that my institute had been awarded a grant from this same funding body. She wanted to know who she should contact for advice on her department’s submission. Pleased as punch, I gave her some advice over the phone, and gave out my email address for future reference.<\/p>\n

Baby steps, I know. But it’s nice that people are starting to come to me for help and advice. It will take me years (if they give me that long) to learn all the ins and outs of this job, but my first taste of independence has been very welcome. Especially as my 6 month review is well and truly overdue (coming within a couple of weeks apparently).<\/p>\n

Things that may detract from my budding image as a competent, mature professional who is the fount of all knowledge:<\/p>\n