On Twitter
Stephen Curry
@Stephen_Curry- No likelihood of agreement here but at least it's a long, long way from bombs & bullets. https://t.co/SHeba9BNqn
about 8 hours ago - @lecanardnoir You and me – job share? OK, I'll do Mon-Thu. I'm not giving up my weekends.
about 9 hours ago - Do it, Phil. Then renege on the deal. Mwah-ha-ha! twitter.com/stewartwood/st…
about 9 hours ago - @Dr_Aust_PhD New one has some tweaked cgi. But happily neither has the voiceover!
about 10 hours ago
- No likelihood of agreement here but at least it's a long, long way from bombs & bullets. https://t.co/SHeba9BNqn
-
-
Tag Archives: scientific publishing
Pride and Prejudice and journal citation distributions
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a researcher in possession of interesting experimental results, must be in want of a journal with a high impact factor. It is also true – and widely understood – that journal impact factors … Continue reading
Posted in Academic publishing, Open Access
Tagged Citation distributions, impact factor, open access, scientific publishing
Comments Off on Pride and Prejudice and journal citation distributions
Combining preprints and post-publication peer review: a new (big) deal?
Stimulated, I believe, by Ron Vale’s call to preprints last year, various luminaries from the world of science and science publishing will be gathering in Maryland at the headquarters of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) later this month to … Continue reading
Sick of Impact Factors
I am sick of impact factors and so is science. The impact factor might have started out as a good idea, but its time has come and gone. Conceived by Eugene Garfield in the 1970s as a useful tool for … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science
Tagged impact factor, open access, scientific publishing
233 Comments
