On Twitter
Stephen Curry
@Stephen_Curry- Beautiful and powerful. And, sadly, probably beyond the will to comprehension of the likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg, Bori… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
about 8 hours ago - Hadley Freeman on the insidiousness and obliviousness of men who sexually harass women. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
about 9 hours ago - Slides from my talk at yesterday’s #ImperialDORA discussion forum on research assessment are now available at:… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
about 10 hours ago - Please get started on making insulin as well as cake. Because we currently import the vast majority of what over 40… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
about 13 hours ago
- Beautiful and powerful. And, sadly, probably beyond the will to comprehension of the likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg, Bori… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
-
Tag Archives: scientific publishing
Pride and Prejudice and journal citation distributions
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a researcher in possession of interesting experimental results, must be in want of a journal with a high impact factor. It is also true – and widely understood – that journal impact factors … Continue reading
Posted in Academic publishing, Open Access
Tagged Citation distributions, impact factor, open access, scientific publishing
Comments Off on Pride and Prejudice and journal citation distributions
Combining preprints and post-publication peer review: a new (big) deal?
Stimulated, I believe, by Ron Vale’s call to preprints last year, various luminaries from the world of science and science publishing will be gathering in Maryland at the headquarters of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) later this month to … Continue reading
Sick of Impact Factors
I am sick of impact factors and so is science. The impact factor might have started out as a good idea, but its time has come and gone. Conceived by Eugene Garfield in the 1970s as a useful tool for … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science
Tagged impact factor, open access, scientific publishing
233 Comments
