-
Recent Posts
- Conduct Unbecoming – how can the Royal Society escape its Musk box?
- Response to the Free Speech Union’s article on my letter to the Royal Society
- An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Trump, DEI and Culture – what’s the vibe shift?
- Books of 2024 – a disappointing year
- Photos of 2024
Recent Comments
- Stephen on Conduct Unbecoming – how can the Royal Society escape its Musk box?
- Mike Taylor on Conduct Unbecoming – how can the Royal Society escape its Musk box?
- Dr Nigel Lucas, FREng. on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- 1,700 Academics vs the Richest Man in the World - The Courier Online on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Stephen on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Ralf Berger on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
Archives
Categories
- Academic publishing
- AltMed
- Astronomy
- Blogging
- Book Review
- Brexit
- Cinema
- Communication
- Equality Diversity & Inclusion
- Fun
- History of Science
- ICYMI
- International
- Libel Reform
- Maths
- Music
- Open Access
- Philosophy
- Photography
- Protein Crystallography
- Research Assessment
- Science
- Science & Art
- Science & Media
- Science & Politics
- Science culture
- Science Fiction
- Scientific Life
- Teaching
- Technology
- Travel
- TV review
- Uncategorized
Blogroll
Meta
-
Blog: Reciprocal Space Topics:science, arts, life
Author Archives: Stephen
Sick of Impact Factors: Coda
My ‘Sick of Impact Factors‘ blog post seems to have struck much more of a chord than I anticipated. At the time of writing it has attracted over 12,900 page views and 460 tweets, far higher than my usual tallies. The … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Scientific Life
Tagged Impact Factors, open access, science publishing
47 Comments
Sick of Impact Factors
I am sick of impact factors and so is science. The impact factor might have started out as a good idea, but its time has come and gone. Conceived by Eugene Garfield in the 1970s as a useful tool for … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science
Tagged impact factor, open access, scientific publishing
233 Comments
Here goes something: Occam’s Typewriter cornered
Well this is nice. Today Occam’s Typewriter opens a new cornershop, so to speak, at the Guardian. For me, this closes a social media circle that started over four years ago because I can trace my entry to the scientific … Continue reading
“You can’t read this book” but you should
Danny Boyle’s opening ceremony for the London 2012 Olympic Games spread a warm glow through liberal hearts. His imaginative sweep over British history and culture, which managed to be both reverent and irreverent, was filled with a human chaos that constituted a nicely … Continue reading
Posted in Book Review, Libel Reform, Science & Politics
Tagged Freedom of Expression, Libel reform, Nick Cohen
22 Comments
Your Invitation to the Open Access Debate
I said the open access debate had been torrid. And it continues apace in the wake of last week’s announcements from the UK government and RCUK, the organisation that represents the common interests of Britain’s Research Councils. This week at … Continue reading
UK Government Goes For Broke on Open Access
Well that was quick. Less than a month after the Finch working group published its recommendations on the future of open access, UK science minister David Willetts has responded, saying in effect “Let’s go for it.” The government has taken … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science & Politics
Tagged David Willetts, open access, Publishing
23 Comments
The Young Atheist’s Handbook by Alom Shaha
Don’t be misled by the title: this is a book about love. Love for life, love for family and love for curiosity, which leads — circularly — to a love affair with books. Don’t be misled by the title: this … Continue reading
The Entrepreneurial State by Mariana Mazzucato
This is not new since Mariana Mazzucato’s breezy pamphlet, The Entrepreneurial State, was published a year ago, but it was new to me. I’ve just finishing reading it, having snagged one of the copies that she brought to June’s fascinating Science Question … Continue reading
Open Access by Peter Suber
There has been a fairly torrid debate over open access over the last six months (even longer for aficionados). For people who look in only occasionally it must seem like a storm that swirls around the same arguments time and … Continue reading
Open Access: Who Pays the Copy-editor?
My article on open access in the New Scientist provoked an email from copy-editor Miranda Potter. Starting from the article’s mention of my recent paper in PLoS ONE, she raises the question of who is going to pay for copy-editing … Continue reading
An Eye for an Eye
I have the feeling that there have been too many words on this blog of late. I need a break and wonder if the beleaguered reader does too. Since I happened to be in the sunshine on London’s South Bank … Continue reading
Finch Report: the question of costs
Last week, having quickly digested the executive summary of the Finch Report on open access (OA), I told you it was complicated. I’ve now read the report in its entirety, along with a large swathes of blogospheric commentary. I’m still decidedly of the view … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science & Politics
Tagged elsevier, Finch Report, open access, Science Policy
31 Comments