-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Dr Nigel Lucas, FREng. on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- 1,700 Academics vs the Richest Man in the World - The Courier Online on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Stephen on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Ralf Berger on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Krishna Kumar Venkitachalam Iyer on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Giuseppe Iurescia on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
Archives
Categories
- Academic publishing
- AltMed
- Astronomy
- Blogging
- Book Review
- Brexit
- Cinema
- Communication
- Equality Diversity & Inclusion
- Fun
- History of Science
- ICYMI
- International
- Libel Reform
- Maths
- Music
- Open Access
- Philosophy
- Photography
- Protein Crystallography
- Research Assessment
- Science
- Science & Art
- Science & Media
- Science & Politics
- Science culture
- Science Fiction
- Scientific Life
- Teaching
- Technology
- Travel
- TV review
- Uncategorized
Blogroll
Meta
-
Blog: Reciprocal Space Topics:science, arts, life -
Tag Archives: impact factor
Pride and Prejudice and journal citation distributions
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a researcher in possession of interesting experimental results, must be in want of a journal with a high impact factor. It is also true – and widely understood – that journal impact factors … Continue reading
Posted in Academic publishing, Open Access
Tagged Citation distributions, impact factor, open access, scientific publishing
Comments Off on Pride and Prejudice and journal citation distributions
The REF: what is the measure of success?
Science has been extraordinarily successful at taking the measure of the world, but paradoxically the world finds it extraordinarily difficult to take the measure of science — or any type of scholarship for that matter. That is not for want … Continue reading
Impact factors are clouding our judgement
Nature has an interesting news feature this week on impact factors. Eugenie Samuel Reich’s article — part of a special supplement covering various aspects of the rather ill-defined notion of impact — explores whether publication in journals such as Nature or Science is … Continue reading
Impact Factors — Letter to RCUK
Following my post of last week asking RCUK to include in the guidelines on their new open access policy a statement disavowing the use of impact factors in assessing funding applications, I wanted to thank everyone who registered their support. … Continue reading
Impact factors — RCUK provides a chance to act
If I had more time, this post would be shorter. But it explains how we have an opportunity to get UK research councils to help break the corrosive dependence of researchers on impact factors. Please at least skim all the … Continue reading
Sick of Impact Factors
I am sick of impact factors and so is science. The impact factor might have started out as a good idea, but its time has come and gone. Conceived by Eugene Garfield in the 1970s as a useful tool for … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science
Tagged impact factor, open access, scientific publishing
233 Comments
