-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Dr Nigel Lucas, FREng. on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- 1,700 Academics vs the Richest Man in the World - The Courier Online on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Stephen on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Ralf Berger on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Krishna Kumar Venkitachalam Iyer on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Giuseppe Iurescia on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
Archives
Categories
- Academic publishing
- AltMed
- Astronomy
- Blogging
- Book Review
- Brexit
- Cinema
- Communication
- Equality Diversity & Inclusion
- Fun
- History of Science
- ICYMI
- International
- Libel Reform
- Maths
- Music
- Open Access
- Philosophy
- Photography
- Protein Crystallography
- Research Assessment
- Science
- Science & Art
- Science & Media
- Science & Politics
- Science culture
- Science Fiction
- Scientific Life
- Teaching
- Technology
- Travel
- TV review
- Uncategorized
Blogroll
Meta
-
Blog: Reciprocal Space Topics:science, arts, life -
Tag Archives: science publishing
ICYMI No. 2: Time for positive action on negative results
Today I had a short opinion piece in Chemical and Engineering News on publishing negative results, a topic that I covered about this time last year in the Guardian on the occasion of the publication my lab’s first paper on an … Continue reading
Posted in Academic publishing, ICYMI, Science
Tagged Chemical and Engineering News, science publishing
Comments Off on ICYMI No. 2: Time for positive action on negative results
Sick of Impact Factors: Coda
My ‘Sick of Impact Factors‘ blog post seems to have struck much more of a chord than I anticipated. At the time of writing it has attracted over 12,900 page views and 460 tweets, far higher than my usual tallies. The … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Scientific Life
Tagged Impact Factors, open access, science publishing
47 Comments
Open Access: Who Pays the Copy-editor?
My article on open access in the New Scientist provoked an email from copy-editor Miranda Potter. Starting from the article’s mention of my recent paper in PLoS ONE, she raises the question of who is going to pay for copy-editing … Continue reading
Why I chose to decline an invitation to review by Elsevier
All relationships suffer tensions from time to time, especially those based on love-hate. Scientists have a complex relationship with their publishers — they love to get published in high-impact journals (most of which are run by major publishing companies) but … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science, Scientific Life
Tagged elsevier, love-hate, open access, science publishing
58 Comments
Is Massively Collaborative Scientific Publishing Possible?
The job of a newspaper columnist is to agitate and George Monbiot did exactly that last week with a furious rant in The Guardian about academic publishers. It may have been an odd choice for most of his readers but … Continue reading
Posted in Communication, Open Access, Science, Scientific Life
Tagged peer review, science publishing
113 Comments
