In which we are inundated: the #ukstorm lingers on

Britain is as soggy as a crumpet dunked in tea.

(No Brits I know actually dunk their crumpets in tea, but it sounds suitably British, doesn’t it?)

Even for a wet, rainy country used to wet, rainy winters, it’s been pretty darned wet here in the UK. Thousands of homes are still flooded and without power, beach fronts have been destroyed by monster tides, and the Thames Barrier has seen 25% of its lifetime action in the past two months alone, even though it was built more than thirty years ago. Fierce winds have brought down trees and power lines, flipped cars, forced entire train lines to a standstill and even killed a taxi driver via a massive chunk of dislodged mortar in Holborn Circus. Historically masters of the civilized world, we Brits have had to turn to the Dutch (yet again), this time for extra pumps. They might want to redesign the entire county of Surrey while they’re at it.


The Thames, looking deceptively tame last week

Although weather carnage has been going on for weeks in the rest of the UK, the Prime Minister’s decision to act at last correlated suspiciously with the moment the mansions of the Home Counties (presumably full of rich Tory occupants) finally started succumbing to high waters last week. It’s hard not to be cynical hearing him trumpet, so very late, how we’re all in this together and money is no object. Try telling that to the Cornish.


Destroyed huts on Cromer East Beach, about a fortnight ago


Richard and Joshua inspect a casualty of wind in the park. Another felled tree missed our block of flats by a few feet this past weekend.

Predictably, there’s been a lot of wibbling about climate change, mostly from Labour politicians trying to score points. We don’t have anything as cool-sounding as a Polar Vortex here, though, and the flooding of flood plains may not actually be that unusual. And certainly not as sexy. Proving definitively that the crazy weather this winter on either side of the Pond is anthropogenic is probably quite tricky from a scientific standpoint. But it did all remind me of Kim Stanley Robinson‘s excellent lab lit fiction trilogy about climate change, kicking off with Forty Signs of Rain. Do check them out if you want to get into global warming’s equivalent of the Blitz spirit.

Posted in LabLit, Politics | 10 Comments

In which baking imitates science

It’s Friday, and Richard and I couldn’t help noticing that this croissant looked as if it were about to extravasate and transmigrate to the bottom of the oven, in search of…invading micro-organisms? Damaged tissue?

Jam?

We’ll never know, but check out that gorgeous lamellipodium.

Posted in Scientific thinking, Silliness | 1 Comment

In which I multitask

Less than two weeks remain until my big fellowship application is due – the one I’m banking on to rescue me from the dwindling life of my latest short-term contract. If I get the fellowship, my position should finally be secure. If not, I’ll need to scrabble together another fellowship or short-term contract, or try to find a different position altogether. All of this is happening in the context of the mind-blowingly large number of pounds I have just set up as a monthly standing order to Joshua’s new nursery starting in February, and the stark fact that after childcare fees, the mortgage and the other household bills, there are only a few pence left to rub together for anything else. An interruption in salary, no matter how short, is simply not an option.

No pressure, then.

I’ve been thinking a lot, first, about how much work I’ve been able to get done on maternity leave and second, whether in fact that’s actually been a good thing. The answer to the first question is: quite a bit. I’ve seen two papers through to publication, and I’m working on a third, fiddling with figures, tweaking text, and liaising with a few researchers who are finalizing the data. I’ve sat on a study section for the Swiss National Science Foundation. And every day this month, I’ve chipped away at the fellowship, both on my computer at home, and during the occasional jaunt into town to chat with my PhD student and various collaborators (pram and all).

But is this really a positive thing, with a new baby to look after?


Grant vs grant

Given my musings, this article by Dr Rebecca Braun, published last week in the Times Higher, was pretty timely. Briefly, she describes an academic’s view of maternity leave, how the work itself doesn’t stop even when it probably should, and how that makes her feel. One passage in particular really got to me:

Each time I have sat at my computer over the past seven months, I have thoroughly resented the demands my job continues to make on me. But I have thoroughly enjoyed the intellectual stimulation of carrying out the tasks nevertheless. This has of course led to feelings of extreme guilt, as my older children have asked why they have to go to after-school club when I am on “eternity leave”, and my youngest has been left to grumble in her cot for longer than was fair. I have not had time to go for coffee with other mothers at the school gate, and I have completely failed to be any better at staying in touch with friends and family. My work, by contrast, keeps on demanding and attracting my attention.

The “grumbling in the cot” bit resonated with me especially strongly. Now don’t get me wrong: I spend an enormous amount of time with Joshua. I feed him every three hours, change his nappies, read and sing to him, take him for long walks in the woods, lie on the carpet batting his hanging toys towards him and making his mobile spin. But when he naps, I leap to the computer and crunch out as much as humanly possible until he starts to stir again. I sneak around the house on tiptoe, hardly daring to breathe, so that I won’t wake him up. And sometimes, just sometimes, I let him grizzle a bit while I finish up a particularly troublesome sentence or image manipulation.

Does this make me a bad mother? I hope not. I also let him stew sometimes so I can prepare my lunch, do the laundry, tidy the kitchen or take a shower. It’s all about maintaining a balance between being a mum and retaining my sanity. I won’t deny that sometimes childcare gets a little boring: the other day, I caught myself trying to liven up proceedings by working out how to play Carl Orff’s “O Fortuna” from Carmina Burana on Joshua’s squeaky toys. But other times, especially after a long day, I will gladly sit on the sofa for an hour or more, absolutely content while he snores gently, a heavy, warm and miraculous weight on my chest, the light fading and the rain pattering against the window glass. I could probably be scribbling notes for a Gantt chart or proofing text at the same time, but I don’t need or want to. I know he won’t be so small forever, and I don’t want to let it slip away.

Posted in Careers, Domestic bliss, Staring into the abyss, The profession of science, Women in science | 16 Comments

In which I yearn for retro lab chic

They don’t make ’em like they used to. Or at least, they don’t name ’em.

Harry and I recently stumbled across this beauty when we were clearing out some of the side rooms in our new lab space.

Allow me to present the Labofuge 6000. Lab-o-fuuuuuuuge. Six thousand, baby. Making it sound as if 5,999 previous models had culminated in this one specimen of spinning, thrumming perfection. Exactly the sort of silly name I was lampooning in my second novel when I named a fictitious bit of kit the “Interactrex 3000”.

What leaps out at you about the Labofuge 6000? It’s big. It’s solid. It’s no-nonsense. It’s got an awesome 180-degree analogue dial thingie, so you know exactly where you stand – none of this digital nonsense. It was made, I am reliably informed by the internets, back in the early ‘Eighties. 1981, to be precise. In 1981, the Human League’s “Don’t You Want Me” was number one in the UK for five straight weeks; across the Pond, the longest running number-one single on Billboard‘s Hot 100 was “Physical” by Olivia Newton-John. Yes, when the Labofuge was in its prime, I was wearing leg-warmers and rah-rah skirts, getting snubbed by boys who didn’t like girls who knew the answers in class, and was consoling my hurt feelings by losing myself in all the amazing things I was learning in my first serious biology class. I believe it was also the year I was voted by my classmates “Most Likely To Become A Scientist” (which I’m pretty sure was not meant to be a compliment).

But back to the present. As with all the other crap Harry and I have found lying around under decades of dust, we plugged it in and gave it a spin. (Sorry.) We’re not flush with cash, and neither are we proud. But alas, the Labofuge 6000 was not destined to join our fleet of ancient, second-hand workhorses. When we switched it on, the rotor shuddered into life without us having touched any of the dials and began spinning so fast that the entire body rattled and quaked and slowly started to inch its way off the bench. Fortunately, Harry managed to yank the plug, HAL-like, before it crashed onto the floor. Yes, like all the other clapped out fridges, incubators and miscellaneous apparati we’d inherited, the poor Labofuge 6000 had been abandoned for good reason.

Shame. I have a thing about old lab equipment. The new stuff can be downright annoying. Take our brand-spanking-new shaking incubator. If you want to change the rotation speed, instead of simply turning a dial up or down to the desired setting, you have to press five different buttons in the right sequence and then enter a three-digit code. The people who design these things obviously don’t have to use them on a daily basis. I wish I’d had a chance to see the Labofuge in action more than thirty years ago. I’m sure she left all her competition in the dust.

Posted in Nostalgia, Silliness | 13 Comments

In which self-help goes all Jurassic on your ass

I don’t even know where to begin.

How is this analogy even remotely helpful to those of us currently living in the Cenozoic Era?

Posted in Silliness, Writing | 17 Comments

In which I have too much to lose

There’s an amusing adage I’ve been hearing about babies all my life: They make ’em cute so you won’t kill ’em.


The F1, last week

Evolutionarily, there may be something to that. If it was anything other than your own darling offspring screaming purple-faced at you at three in the morning, who wouldn’t, in the just-woken haze of chronic sleep deprivation, be tempted to — as a shamefaced new-parent friend recently confessed to me — stash them in a cardboard box out in the back garden?

I was ready to be faced with the physical and emotional trauma of lost sleep and howling tantrums. But nothing prepared me for the gut-clenching fear. You hear about it, of course, how new parents “worry”. The phrase You can’t wrap them in cotton wool is an understated nod of the century to the trepidation that having a child inspires. In some ways I was conditioned gradually; after already having suffered a miscarriage, my pregnancy was one long stretch of anxiety about the stability of the new life within me. Once I’d passed the 28-week milestone, my thoughts then turned cheerfully to birth defects. But having borne a ridiculously hearty and hale little boy, squirming and grunting and squealing vitality out of every pore (and other orifices), I now wake up in night sweats from sick visions of him being ill, or dying, or tortured, or snatched away by human traffickers.

My son has wound his way so tightly around my heart that the what-if terrors shimmer around my every thought of him, shadows that can never be brushed entirely aside.

What is the purpose of this all-encompassing and superfluous fear? Is it adaptive? It can’t be right to want to shelter a child from every conceivable harm — not if it prevents him from living a normal life. And it can’t be right for my own personal sanity. I will of course strike the right balance, even if stepping back somewhat makes my stomach eat itself from the inside out. But was it really so necessary, biologically, to build this into the mix?

Posted in Domestic bliss, Staring into the abyss | 17 Comments

In which nature imitates science

On the walk from my house to Russia Dock Woodlands, you have to pass by a particular hedgerow. Like all good hedgerows, it’s thick and impenetrable and rustling with unseen bird life. And it produces lots of bright-red berries, which frequently fall off and spill all over the pavement.


A hedgerow, yesterday

Maybe I’ve just got too much science on the brain, but whenever the sunlight is at a particular angle, especially in the winter when it is especially low in the sky, there is something about the shadows cast by the berries onto the rough cement that reminds me of images of molecules obtained by Atomic Force Microscopy.

Every year I look out for the “AFM berries” and smile to myself.

Well, no white Christmas for us here in Rotherhithe this year, just lashings of rain and gusting wind, the sort that blows down fences and rips tiles off the roof. But Richard, Joshua and I are safe indoors with our beautiful tree, plenty of food and drink and candles lit against the early darkness.

Happy Christmas to all.

Posted in Domestic bliss, Scientific thinking, Silliness | 2 Comments

In which I drop in

I’m now roughly two-thirds of the way through my maternity leave, and feeling surprisingly good. After nearly three months with my new son, I’m finally under control: he is starting to sleep well at night, and I have mastered all the tricks we need to get through the day together in a reasonably calm and happy manner.

My academic life, meanwhile, continues on the back burner. I coach my PhD student by telephone, continue to work on a manuscript with my old lab via email, and start gearing up for a major fellowship application due in February. My team just had a second paper out, this time in PLoS One. And I need to write up some interim results for the grant – on treating urinary tract infections with microspheres – that currently pays my salary.

Yesterday I popped into the lab to pick up a notebook I need to consult for the interim report. Nobody was currently working in it, but I was pleased to see how inviting the space appeared now that everything’s been properly unpacked and put to use.

Unlocking my office next door, I was stricken to see I’d forgotten to arrange care for my roommate:

Otherwise, all was well. The room was cozy and warm from the central heating – a distinct novelty – and all of my books, folders and notebooks were lined up patiently on the shelf, waiting for me to consult them once again. Everything felt peaceful and conducive to serious thinking. Suddenly, I experienced the deep urge to cancel my afternoon plans and dawdle there for a while, perhaps catching up on some reading or proofing the fellowship draft. The pull was both primitive and seductive: the urge to discover, to know, to keep building my project like a house of blocks, one little teetering cube at a time.

Instead, with only a small twinge of regret, I changed my son’s nappy, tucked him back into his pram and headed out into the chill London daylight. He was smiling in his sleep. My office – my job, my science – isn’t going anywhere. It will still be there when I return. But in the meantime, it’s good to know it’s waiting, patiently, a little secret world especially for me.

Posted in Domestic bliss, The profession of science | 1 Comment

In which I narrowly avoid oblivion

Even at moments of the most extreme duress, it is difficult for me to stop thinking like a scientist.

A few days after the birth of my son some twelve weeks ago, things were just starting to normalize for Richard and me. We were home from the hospital and, though the daze of sleepless nights had hit us pretty hard, we’d found time to get out of the house. I recall that walk in the park now as if it had been a dream, the baby snug in a sling against Richard’s chest, a little miracle with blue eyes and spun-gold hair: a warm autumnal afternoon, weak sunshine, leaves colored russet and flame and fluttering to the ground. We even picked a few late blackberries from the tangle of brambles by the pond. Richard ran up Stave Hill and I snapped his photo, silhouetted with our baby against the deep blue sky streaked with herringbone clouds.

The next morning, something began to be not quite right in my head. In the early hours during a feed, in the darkened bedroom, the streetlamp reflecting off the overhead lampshade looked uncomfortably like an evil eye that would not stop glaring at me. When I woke later to daylight, I started to register visual disturbances. Assuming it was the aura of a migraine, which I suffer from occasionally, I resigned myself to the inevitable headache. But the auras were all wrong: normally they scintillate in a crescent shape to one side of my vision, distracting but largely benign. This was something different: it wasn’t just a disturbance superimposed over reality: it was an alteration of reality itself. Fascinated more than alarmed at this point, I stood there trying to see a soap dish on the sink that I knew was there, but it seemed to slip away from view from whatever angle I attempted. It was both there and not there, in a blur of distortion similar to the way that ripples on a lake obscure the stones on the bottom. But in a few more minutes, I was almost blind.

I groped my way to find Richard: I have a distinct memory of trying to explain to him about the soap dish, and a memory that I was both very lucid and completely out of control: I could hear that my words did not make sense, and I even told Richard that I knew I was not making sense. That’s the last thing I remember clearly. There is a vague blur of being in an ambulance, the kindly paramedic asking me to touch my nose and then his finger: struggling to do this without concentrating very hard. I remember that the world was drenched in beautiful colors. I might remember being wheeled into the Kings College Hospital ED – or perhaps I only think I do. Much later, Richard was able to tell me that I’d suffered a grand mal seizure in the bedroom, that I’d nearly bitten his finger off, that after rousing from the coma-like finale, I’d babbled syllables that made absolutely no sense. After the ambulance ride, being unloaded from the wheelchair to a bed in the ED, I have a clear memory of saying, “Oh God, it’s happening again.”

Apparently, I then suffered a second seizure, but the next day is a total blank. After the seizures were controlled, Richard says I was sent for a head CT scan, cloistered in the HDU and given a drip of magnesium sulphate. My blood pressure was sky-high. My hands and arms sprouted cannulas; I was catheterized. Richard says I was aware during a lot of this, but amnesia has partially wiped my memory. I can’t quite recall when I came around. He says I would be speaking to him, and then I’d just dwindle away for minutes, forgetting that I was speaking. It was very difficult to find words, to formulate sentences. At one point I remembered that I had a newborn baby, and there he was, sleeping in the plastic bassinet next to my bed. A never-ending series of midwives, day and night, helped me change the baby and put him to my breast, or gave him formula when I was unable. I was so out of it that it didn’t even occur to me to ask anyone what was wrong with me, and nobody was telling me either, so that was fine. The worst times were when Richard went home, leaving me alone except for the night shift – who were kind, but very busy and seldom around. The neon cross on the Sir Giles Gilbert Scott-designed Salvation Army building, visible from my window, at first was comforting, but eventually seemed like an outpost in the middle of nowhere in South London and only reminded me of the incredible loneliness of those long nights.

The most memorable things about that transition from oblivion to reality were the visual disturbances. I was no longer blind, but the light show was spectacular. I was aware enough now to know that it was not real, but a few times I had to ask Richard if what I was seeing was an illusion. Parts of objects, outlines in particular, would occasionally flash like lightning. Every white space – the walls, the ceiling, the back of the hospital bed – would gradually fill up with evenly spaced red polka dots after each blink, like a Bridget Riley painting. Always dots, always red. But dark spaces, and the black universe behind my closed eyes, would become populated with the outline of interlocking green hexagons, very reminiscent of an epithelial tissue seen from a birds’ eye view, the sort of image I’d seen hundreds of time in my previous lab. Sometimes I’d see neon-like squiggles or lines. I was confused at that point, thinking it was a side-effect of the drugs. But it wasn’t: the drugs were struggling to cure me of the visions.

By the time I was taken down for the MRI, I was more or less fully coherent. As I lay in the cold, noisy tube, fighting against the panic of claustrophobia, I allowed the green hexagons to soothe me: at least they were familiar by now. The scan brought a diagnosis, and finally the doctors were telling me why I was there. I had suffered from eclampsia a few days after the birth, having had no warning signs beforehand – this is vanishingly rare (so rare that later, my GP would refuse to follow me up, declaring himself not qualified). At every antenatal appointment, my blood pressure had been normal with no sign of protein in my urine – the tell-tale signs of pre-eclampsia, a forerunner to this life-threatening complication of pregnancy. But my affliction had struck out of the blue. The resulting hypertension had caused not only the classic seizures, but had then stimulated my brain to swell – the posterior part, where the occipital lobe lies: the center of the brain that controls vision. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: PRES for short, revealed by telltale patches of white on the brain scan.

Reversible. Thank God for that.

I wondered many things, and still do. Would I have died if Richard had not come home from shopping when he did that morning – would an hour later have spelled my end? Why did I develop eclampsia in the first place, without the pre- bit, and so many days after delivering? Why weren’t the doctors more concerned about my maternal age at the time, and why hadn’t they put that together with the fact that I’d reported the worst headache of my life, lingering 36 hours after the birth, coupled to a few really high blood pressure readings as I lay in recovery?

These are all important questions. But, scientist that I am, what I really want to know most of all is: why were my visual disturbances so uniform? Why the red dots, the green hexagons? Does everyone with PRES see these, or does each individual have his or her own special patterns for light and dark areas of vision? Did I see green hexagons because of some array of cells on my retina, somehow reverse-visualized – or was this pattern emblazoned onto some memory bank after years of looking at immunofluorescence images of epithelia in my previous lab? Do we know anything at all about these visions? And what does it say about the true reality of our environment, when something seemingly so subtle in the brain can alter it so completely?

I’m better now. I think I’ve made a full recovery. Sometimes I still search for words or the wrong one comes out of my mouth – but this could easily be nothing more sinister than new-mother sleep-deprivation taking its toll. I am left acutely grateful for my life, for my intellect, for my family, for my sense of reality being intact. Because there is a fine line between that and oblivion.

Posted in Scientific thinking, Staring into the abyss | 20 Comments

In which UK science funding faces a sudden new peril

A spokesperson for Vladimir Putin recently mocked the United Kingdom for being a “small island” to which no one paid any heed. He is clearly not familiar with the UK’s impressive scientific reputation on the world stage: with just 1% of the world’s population and 3% of global public spending on science, we publish 8% of the world’s papers and rack up 12% of citations. We do disproportionately well with Nobel Prizes as well. (Needless to say, Russia eats our dust: with three times the population, they have 2% of publications and 0.9% of citations.) In addition to bringing societal benefits such as useful technology and cures for diseases, a strong research base helps fuel innovation, and many believe that a robust R&D agenda is crucial for economic growth.

The current UK government has frequently expressed its commitment to science funding, although this commitment, since 2010, has not equated to investing enough to offset the heavy erosion of inflation. But I sometimes wonder how much the Coalition really and truly believes in science’s importance. For example, I thought it was quite telling that, after Putin’s “small island” jab, David Cameron’s rapturous defence of the UK’s excellence encompassed a broad range of assets – from our music, art, philosophy and literature to our military, sport and even our diplomats – but utterly failed to mention science. A conspicuous absence, and evidence, perhaps, that despite its various sound bites to the contrary, the government has not truly internalized science’s worth or importance at any meaningful level.

I’ll be honest with you, dear readers. I’m rather alarmed at the recent news leak out of the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills this past Friday, and a little angry too. My fellow Occam’s Typist, Stephen Curry, has a nice summary up today at the Guardian, but briefly, BIS has miscalculated on its budget and is considering making up the slack by reneging on its promise to ring-fence the research budget through to 2016 and raiding it for £215m.

It’s completely unclear when the final decision will be made, and therefore how much time we, as scientists or pro-science citizens, have to react. Such off-piste budgetary adjustments are uncharted territory for Science is Vital, the grassroots campaign group I chair. Like everyone else, we assumed the next battleground would be in the run-up to the general election, trying to persuade each party to put investment in research at the heart of their manifestos. We thought there was plenty of time to prepare ourselves for what would likely be a challenging exercise.

We were wrong. But it may not be too late to act. Please spread the word, follow the news at Science is Vital, attend our AGM, write your MP – and just generally, don’t let us take this lying down. The real-term cuts are already biting – another 2% could be devastating.



Note: The views expressed here are my own, and not necessarily those of Science is Vital

Posted in Politics, science funding, Science is Vital | 3 Comments