-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Dr Nigel Lucas, FREng. on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- 1,700 Academics vs the Richest Man in the World - The Courier Online on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Stephen on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Ralf Berger on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Krishna Kumar Venkitachalam Iyer on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Giuseppe Iurescia on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
Archives
Categories
- Academic publishing
- AltMed
- Astronomy
- Blogging
- Book Review
- Brexit
- Cinema
- Communication
- Equality Diversity & Inclusion
- Fun
- History of Science
- ICYMI
- International
- Libel Reform
- Maths
- Music
- Open Access
- Philosophy
- Photography
- Protein Crystallography
- Research Assessment
- Science
- Science & Art
- Science & Media
- Science & Politics
- Science culture
- Science Fiction
- Scientific Life
- Teaching
- Technology
- Travel
- TV review
- Uncategorized
Blogroll
Meta
-
Blog: Reciprocal Space Topics:science, arts, life
Author Archives: Stephen
ICYMI No. 6: What is the meaning of Brexit?
Today EMBO Reports has published my commentary on the implications for scientific research of Britain’s recent decision to leave the EU. It’s free to read. The piece is trying to be more analytical than the more personal response that I posted at … Continue reading
Posted in ICYMI, International, Science & Politics
Tagged ICYMI, Science Policy
Comments Off on ICYMI No. 6: What is the meaning of Brexit?
Pride and Prejudice and journal citation distributions
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a researcher in possession of interesting experimental results, must be in want of a journal with a high impact factor. It is also true – and widely understood – that journal impact factors … Continue reading
Posted in Academic publishing, Open Access
Tagged Citation distributions, impact factor, open access, scientific publishing
Comments Off on Pride and Prejudice and journal citation distributions
For your consideration: a preprint on open access and public engagement
I have just posted a preprint of a book chapter on the interactions of open access and public engagement with science. It’s called “Open Access: the beast that no-one could – or should – control?” and is my contribution to an upcoming … Continue reading
Posted in Academic publishing, Open Access, Science & Politics
Tagged Making Science Public, open access, Preprints, Public engagement
Comments Off on For your consideration: a preprint on open access and public engagement
Letters from Europe
This weekend’s Guardian has a quite wonderful feature comprised of letters to Britain from European writers about the decision to be made in the upcoming referendum. It offers a fresh and little-heard perspective on a debate that has become worn … Continue reading
Posted in International
2 Comments
How to look at Art?
I was sneered at on Twitter yesterday for sneering at people taking pictures of the Impressionist paintings on display at the Musée D’Orsay in Paris. Fair enough perhaps. I had adopted an exaggerated version of the pontifical tone that comes … Continue reading
Posted in Science & Art
1 Comment
ICYMI No. 5: Asking universities to be open about research assessment
I first wrote about the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) when it was launched in May 2013. DORA is a simple statement asking the different players in the business of academic research to free themselves from the damaging … Continue reading
Posted in ICYMI, Open Access
Tagged ICYMI
Comments Off on ICYMI No. 5: Asking universities to be open about research assessment
Transitory Mercury
I wasn’t sure I was going to get to see today’s celestial encounter. The forecast was for blanket cover by early afternoon and the blue skies of the morning had largely filled with cloud by lunchtime, when the transit was due … Continue reading
ICYMI No. 4: Books to read before university
This week’s Times Higher Education has a nice cover feature listing books recommended by various scholars to students preparing for university. More particularly, as the author of the piece, Matthew Reisz, explained to me in an email, “We are asking … Continue reading
Posted in Book Review, ICYMI
Tagged ICYMI
Comments Off on ICYMI No. 4: Books to read before university
ICYMI No. 3: Academic publishing on the radio
This is rather self-serving, even by my standards, but I made a plan with these “In Case You Missed It” posts and I’m sticking to it. I have been on the radio a couple of times in the past month … Continue reading
Posted in Academic publishing, ICYMI, Open Access
Comments Off on ICYMI No. 3: Academic publishing on the radio
Review: Heart of the Original
Steve Aylett’s short book on originality, creativity and individuality may conform externally to the rectilinear format of most other books but is otherwise highly elliptical. I found it maddening. Heart of the Original – Alan Moore loved it. It has … Continue reading
Posted in Book Review
Comments Off on Review: Heart of the Original
Review: The Many Worlds of Albie Bright
After publishing my round-up of the books I’d read in 2015, the author Christopher Edge got in touch via twitter to offer a review copy of his new book, The Many Worlds of Albie Bright. It’s a short novel for … Continue reading
Posted in Book Review
Comments Off on Review: The Many Worlds of Albie Bright
ICYMI No. 2: Time for positive action on negative results
Today I had a short opinion piece in Chemical and Engineering News on publishing negative results, a topic that I covered about this time last year in the Guardian on the occasion of the publication my lab’s first paper on an … Continue reading
Posted in Academic publishing, ICYMI, Science
Tagged Chemical and Engineering News, science publishing
Comments Off on ICYMI No. 2: Time for positive action on negative results