In which I am still largely at large: another mother in academia

Blogging appearances to the contrary, I am still alive, clinging gamely to some semblance of work-life balance as a new mother in academia.

Not so new anymore, I realize, as Joshua hurtles, one milestone at a time, toward his first birthday. He sways on his feet, unsupported, for long periods of time, yet is still reluctant to let go as he steps along the furniture. He keeps remembering anew that he can clap his hands together, which causes no end of private amusement. He has taken to pointing portentously at all manner of random objects, and is now so curious and fast – a dangerous combination – that we cannot leave him alone for even a second. Still, at least he is sleeping well – most nights. But this long-awaited achievement somehow has not brought my perennial exhaustion to an end as I’d hoped it might.

I think I’m so tired because of changes in my job. As I rework a fellowship at the request of a major funding body, I’ve been helping out as a teaching fellow on a brand-new undergraduate course being launched by the university. It’s an ambitious and innovative program aimed to teach a fusion of medicine and science to researchers who want to work with clinicians or in an applied setting, and we’re doing it all from scratch using a flipped learning approach that hasn’t been employed much here. So all eyes are on us – my own faculty, and other departments thinking of taking the plunge into flipped learning with a significant online component – and the first cohort of students is due to arrive in exactly three weeks. Meanwhile, I’m still looking after the lab and keeping a team of basic scientists afloat.

But the teaching office is on a different campus, across town from the lab, and the nursery is not located anywhere near either my home or my two sites of employment, which makes life hectic. I love that feeling when I sneak up on all fours on my baby boy at the end of the day and he hurtles himself, cooing and delighted, into my lap. Yet I loathe the final leg, pushing the pram through the rush-hour crowds jostling down Borough High Street and then descending underground to cram the buggy into the sea of irritable commuters flowing eastward on packed Jubilee Line carriages. When Joshua goes down, there are only a few precious hours with which to write or do other creative endeavors, but more often than not I’m working on my last first-author paper from the previous lab (just about to be put to bed in a good home, I think), or dealing with lab stuff, or hiring BSc project students, or proofing papers and grants from the rest of the team and from various collaborators. Or lying on the sofa in a stupor, if I’m honest.

On the literary front, an older story of mine, The Pair-bond Imperative, was selected for the upcoming Nature Futures 2 anthology. I recently sat on a well-attended panel about LabLit fiction at the LONCON3 science fiction convention, and gave a talk at that same august gathering about antibiotic resistance, with a B-movie flavor. (You would think that a science fiction convention could provide adequate geeky tech. But no. Instead, I was given a laptap that couldn’t play movies, so I had to act out the key scene from Fantastic Voyage instead – when Raquel Welch is attacked by antibodies – and received a vigorous round of applause for my efforts. As an aside, can I just note that I found this large group of science fiction afficionados one of the most warmly responsive audiences to whom I’ve ever delivered a science talk?) Also, I was interviewed about LabLit for an American public radio program, To The Best of Our Knowledge, which must getting syndicated on NPR stations all over the country as I keep getting lovely pockets of fan mail and people suggesting books for my List of science novels every few weeks or so. I struggle to publish one article a week on LabLit, but somehow I manage it, and I’m proud to be approaching our tenth year of existence.

I haven’t been able to write fiction since Joshua was born, however, or work out a good publication plan for my third completed novel, which is the first of a comedy-thriller trilogy about a feminist virologist who is forced to combine forces with a sexist mathematician to solve a mystery cat plague that threatens the whole planet. I keep hoping that the time and energy and creative juices will one day come. For now, I’m happy just to be able to keep everything else afloat and pen the occasional blog or journal entry. One day soon I know the mojo will return.

About Jennifer Rohn

Scientist, novelist, rock chick
This entry was posted in LabLit, Science fiction, Students, Teaching, The profession of science, Women in science, Writing. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to In which I am still largely at large: another mother in academia

  1. cromercrox says:

    The fact that you’re even thinking of turning novel 3 into a trilogy is a good sign.

  2. cromercrox says:

    Independent corroboration of your appearances at WorldCon may be found here: http://cromercrox.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/new-worlds.html

  3. Anita says:

    Oh, I’ve so been here myself – I will really miss popping into a nursery every day and I’ll soon have to stop myself colouring in and reading stories out loud on the commute home (or maybe start a family carriage?). It was wonderful when my children started sleeping through the night and your mojo will be back before you know it – look after yourself!

  4. rpg says:

    Massive spoiler in that post, Henry!

    (And I feel compelled to point out that Jenny is not writing about a plague of cats, but a plague affecting cats. Crucial difference.)

  5. cromercrox says:

    A plague of cats suffering aa plague has possibilities.

    (and where’s the spoiler?)

  6. rpg says:

    You have mail. I’ve already said too much.

  7. cromercrox says:

    I received mail. Now I shall have to kill you.

  8. rpg says:

    Wimpy palaeontologist.

    Hey! I’m also in that ontology, I mean anthology. But neither Jenny or I get a mention in the blurb. Boooo!

  9. Philip Ashton says:

    I love this post.

    Flipped learning just *has* to work better right?!?! Mystery cat plague had me snorting tea through my nostrils. Thank you!

  10. I hadn’t heard of “flipped learning”. Sounds like an interesting, and potentially useful, model. It reminds me a little of the med school teaching I used to do, where there were in-class group assignments to complement the (conventional, classroom) lectures. Move the lectures to YouTube or a similar on-demand, on-line service, and it would look much the same I think.

    And… well done on the Lablit panel (and accompanying dramatics). Is there a video? 🙂

Comments are closed.