-
Recent Posts
- Conduct Unbecoming – how can the Royal Society escape its Musk box?
- Response to the Free Speech Union’s article on my letter to the Royal Society
- An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Trump, DEI and Culture – what’s the vibe shift?
- Books of 2024 – a disappointing year
- Photos of 2024
Recent Comments
- Stephen on Conduct Unbecoming – how can the Royal Society escape its Musk box?
- Mike Taylor on Conduct Unbecoming – how can the Royal Society escape its Musk box?
- Dr Nigel Lucas, FREng. on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- 1,700 Academics vs the Richest Man in the World - The Courier Online on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Stephen on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
- Ralf Berger on An open letter to the President of the Royal Society – time to stand up for your values
Archives
Categories
- Academic publishing
- AltMed
- Astronomy
- Blogging
- Book Review
- Brexit
- Cinema
- Communication
- Equality Diversity & Inclusion
- Fun
- History of Science
- ICYMI
- International
- Libel Reform
- Maths
- Music
- Open Access
- Philosophy
- Photography
- Protein Crystallography
- Research Assessment
- Science
- Science & Art
- Science & Media
- Science & Politics
- Science culture
- Science Fiction
- Scientific Life
- Teaching
- Technology
- Travel
- TV review
- Uncategorized
Blogroll
Meta
-
Blog: Reciprocal Space Topics:science, arts, life
Author Archives: Stephen
Harvard: we have a problem
This is astonishing. Harvard is one of the best and one of the wealthiest universities in the world but last week its Faculty Advisory Council* announced that it can no longer afford to maintain its subscriptions to academic journals. The announcement … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science, Scientific Life
Tagged Harvard, journal subscriptions, open access
50 Comments
Eyes on the prize are blind to reality
Scientists’ quest for publication in journals with high impact factors is widely perceived as one of the more refractory barriers to the fuller adoption of open access, which I believe to be in the best interests of science. But the … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Scientific Life
Tagged Impact Factors, Nature, open access, Prizes, Vanity
56 Comments
What’s your favourite colour?
What’s your favourite colour? Anyone who has socialised with small children will have been confronted with this serious-faced interrogation at some point. It’s the sort of question that erupts as soon as young kids learn to verbalise the jumble of … Continue reading
Hawking with Dinosaurs
Here is a ‘paper‘ that I think would not be accepted by PLoS ONE and yet it was the subject of a report on the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 this morning, arguably the nation’s premier morning news show. … Continue reading
PLoS ONE: from the Public Library of Sloppiness?
I had an argument with my colleague in the tea-room the other day. Gratifyingly, I learned he had been reading my blogposts on the subject of open access, but it soon became clear he did not entirely share my enthusiasm … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science, Scientific Life
Tagged Academic publishing, Arguments, open access, PLoS
72 Comments
Fabulous night
Tonight, at the end of an exhausting day, I have few words, but it was beautifully clear so I have taken some pictures of the night sky. And made a short film. The photographs are by no means exemplary. The … Continue reading
Elsevier, the Research Works Act and Open Access: where to now?
If Elsevier calculated that its withdrawal of support for the Research Works Act (RWA) would neutralise the arguments stirred up around academic publishing, I think the company is mistaken. I certainly hope so. Things may have gone a little quiet … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Scientific Life
Tagged elsevier, open access, Publishing, Research Works Act
37 Comments
Libel Reform: the endgame?
It has been a long and winding road but tonight the journey towards libel reform in England and Wales paused in the historic Great Hall of the Inner Temple to take stock. The wheels are turning and the machine of government … Continue reading
The road well trodden
Scientists should do this. Journalists should do that. And eventually we will live in a world where the media reporting of science achieves perfection. At least that is the hypothesis. The hypothesis was put to the test at the Royal … Continue reading
Science: the bargain for funding
On the Guardian web-site today you will find a piece by myself and Imran Khan of CaSE which is a response to an attack on scientists for striking a faustian bargain with business. The attack was written by Ananyo … Continue reading
Posted in Science, Science & Politics
Tagged ananyo bhattacharya, Guardian, imran khan, Science funding
43 Comments
Some progress on Open Access
This morning there have been two very interesting developments on open access. First, Doug Kell, Chief Executive of the BBSRC, responded on his blog to my open letter. His reply is detailed and goes some way to clarifying progress in … Continue reading
An Open Letter on Open Access to UK Research Councils
Short Version Please read the Wellcome Trust’s policy on open access. And then adopt it. Thank you. Long Version Please read the Wellcome Trust’s policy on open access. It’s short so I’ve pasted it below. The policy states (with … Continue reading
Posted in Open Access, Science, Scientific Life
Tagged Academic publishing, BBSRC, elsevier, open access, RCUK, Wellcome Trust
60 Comments