The moonshot power of Google’s new ‘Solve for X’

With ‘Solve for X’ Google is half way to becoming as evil as the bankers.

Solve for X is being touted as a kind of techno-think tank, like TED but done cloud style. It advertises itself at its launch today as “a place where the curious can go to hear and discuss radical technology ideas for solving global problems” and the aura of glamour around it is already impressing influential commentators.

But while Solve for X wants to fix the planet, it has all the intellectual depth of puddle. This might not matter if it were merely another weapon in Google’s growing armoury of lobbying weapons. But the closer you look at it, the more sinister it becomes.

The blurb for Google’s latest baby makes a lot of a moonshot metaphor, saying, “This combination of things – a huge problem to solve, a radical solution for solving it, and the breakthrough technology to make it happen – is the essence of a moonshot.” But only an American, Russian or Chinese drunk on imperial patriotism could make such a claim.

Even kids like me who dream of being an astronaut grow up to see that there is more to moon races (both 60s-70s vintage and the current generation) than simply an intrepid blend of technology and courage. Super power rivalry. Demonstrating the superiority of a particular political system. Prestige and influence around the world. Nation building. Developing dual use technology that the military wants under the PR-friendly guise of human endeavour. Consolidating the political power of the national leader (ie presidential re-election in the US). Delivering pork for regions with big space bases. Enabling powerful technology institutions and their engineers to rise. Stimulating lucrative contracts for aerospace firms.

To make technology the “essence” of a moonshot is to close your eyes to all these social, financial, military and political drivers, every bit as essential as the technology. The whole metaphor collapses into idiocy as soon as you ask, ‘What problem do moonshots solve?’

But this is not just inept history, it’s a wilful rejection of the true complexity of the world. Solve for X tells us the world is an algebra of precise curves that can be processed by Google’s corporate leitmotif, an algorithm. But as Kant said, “Out of the crooked timber of humanity no straight thing was ever made”. As in Anna Karenina, this narrowing of the eyes is bound to prove fatal, in this case to any attempts to truly better the world. A house built on fantasies rather than reality will always fall down, and it’s the poor and powerless who get crushed by the debris (while the firms paid to build the edifice may still, as in Iraq, walk away rich).

But look closer. What exactly is it in the moonshots that Google is choosing not to look at? The role of technology in strengthening the power of both the US itself and of powerful vested interests within the US. This includes the technologists themselves, some of the most influential of whom are now holed up in Google, and from whose elite ranks are drawn many of the speakers for Solve for X. The first four in the website’s list are identified as the McMorrow Associate Professor of Innovation at the University of Washington, the VP of R&D at MC10, the Co-Founder and Chief Technical Officer of Oasys and CEO and Chairman of InCube Labs, a life sciences research lab.

Turning a blind eye to power is what makes Solve for X genuinely sinister. It gives carte blanche to these same powerful vested interests to try and bend the world to their will through the medium of technology.

This is the Masters of the Universe mentality of the Wall Street elite transplanted to supercool and equally superrich Seattle. It has served the bankers well for decades. In the hands of the people who make today’s intoxicating and blinding gadgets it may be even more potent. The aspiring Masters of Terra have arrived.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Response to RFI on Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research

Mollyali's photo http://www.flickr.com/photos/mollyali/

What a mouthful!

Well, happy new year to everyone. I thought I’d make it a matter of public record that I support the continuation of public access to peer-reviewed scientific productions where it already exists, and the implementation of better access where it doesn’t.

Some components of relative accessibility are currently under attack in the United States. I would encourage anyone to whom this is of concern to also read Dr. Michael Eisen’s beautifully expressed opinion on his blog or directly in today’s New York Times. He also did an excellent job of exposing who was behind the proposed bill and developing plausible hypotheses as to why.

Below the fold, you can read my response. Even though Dr. Cameron Neylon’s was even longer, and I thought I was cutting down to the essentials, it’s still long. And probably quite boring if you don’t care that much about the issue.

I do, as it has a direct effect both on me and my idea of my mission, and on the people I serve in the small patient associations in different countries who fund my work in part. I know for a fact that many of them find access to the biomedical literature difficult, and they ask me for reprints. Which I am glad to provide. I also provide commentary and interpretation in addition, in general, to help place things into context. But personal physicians could do as much.

As a matter of public record, I also participate in the probably slightly subversive References Wanted room and the rather less effective for organizational reasons #icanhaspdf movement on Twitter. (But probably longer-lived, as Friendfeed.com is destined to … no one really knows what.) Everyone puts in a little, and those who put in feel qualified to make an occasional request, and it so far all seems to work out. Until I get made an example of by some publisher.

Echoes of an early ’90s Internet ethos. I like that.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

FINALLY! (Hockey Pool Update, weeks 12 and 13)

FINALLY… I’m winning!

Unfortunately, so is Cath.

We’ve been in lockstep for both weeks 12 and 13, despite not having a great deal of overlap in our picks. So much so, I’ve had to make my line dashed so that you can see hers, which Excel has coloured an attractive shade of muddy green.

Cath and Ricardipus dominate.

It’s pretty tight these days, with the top four contenders within 1.5% of the joint leaders, and the top seven within 10%. Bob is a mere 0.3 points outside that margin in eighth place, and Beth and Mr. E Man are well behind. Fifth/sixth and seventh/eighth are beginning to look like bimodal scraps between ScientistMother and Chall, and Gerty and Bob, respectively. But nothing is certain – the points are so tight that people have been swapping places week over week. Cath, for example, seemed mired in the middle until just a few weeks ago, when she mounted a charge for the top.

The lack of trends defies explanation.

 

Looking at the weekly totals, I’m struck by the lack of trends. I did really well, but that’s not so obvious. Cath and ScientistMother were the clear winners in week 12, and Mr. E Man had a decent showing. Sorted as they are by the week 13 results (maroon bars, highest to lowest), it all looks a bit of a mess.

Which is also how my picks for the upcoming week look, to be honest. I’m relying on the holidays to trip up some competitors and make them forget to make picks, which I admit isn’t much of a strategy. I don’t think I’ve once been on top of the points for any week, but I’m hoping consistency will win out in the end. Crappy weeks notwithstanding, of course.

Roll on 2012!

 

Posted in Fun, Hobbies, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Don’t look now, but…

I won something!

Clearly those allegedly inherited behavioural traits that lead to my questionable sense of humour have paid off.

By way of celebration, here’s a picture of a grinny alien, who looks almost as happy as I am.

grinny alien

That is all.

Posted in Fun | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Comfort Zone

Sometimes, it pays to step out of your comfort zone a little.

I have a camera, and I like to use it. It’s employed for family events, weekends at the cottage, trips to the zoo, and the occasional conference. I haul it with me whenever it’s reasonable and practical. I’ll use it to shoot flowers, frogs, amusement parks, and yes, even race cars. I’m not averse to a bit of street shooting, and would be happy to photograph a rock concert, if I went to rock concerts any more, and if I didn’t think my camera would be taken off me by security. And I always like a new photographic challenge.

So what’s this about comfort zones?

Well, a couple of weekends ago, I found myself smack-dab in the middle of a convention hosted by a Christian men’s organization, as an official event photographer. Let me tell you: these men are righteous in their belief, strong in their faith, and and clear on what they feel is important. Now, I’m not interested in turning this into a debate about belief or faith, nor about presenting or defending my own opinions on the topic. Without getting into detail, let’s just say that a hockey arena full of three thousand or so Christian men is not usually where you’d find me.

Stage setup, Built for Battle 2011
The stage setup, just before doors open.

But, as you might imagine, there are connections and connections and connections behind this. One of the organizers, an evangelical Christian minister who does marketing for the convention’s organizers, is a friend of mine, and (you guessed it) a motorsports fan. He’s run the volunteer photo corps for the Honda Indy Toronto race weekend for years. It was John who recruited me to the Indy team in 2010, in part on the strength of my 2009 photos. It was John who invited me back for 2011, and barring any unusual circumstances, 2012 and beyond. And it was John who asked me if I would mind shooting last year’s Legacy convention… and this year’s Built for Battle. I’m not averse to doing a favour for a friend, and if it involves wielding a camera – well, why not?

Steve Farrar - onstage
Speaker Steve Farrar, delivering a college football anecdote.

So this year wasn’t quite as far outside my comfort zone as last year, but it was still a far cry from the racetrack. For one thing, the experience of being surrounded by an audience completely comprised of men again felt a bit unusual. And then there were the speakers. To a man, they were tremendous, combining different degrees of evangelism, quotations from scripture, easy conversational tone, and here and there little licks of good old southern U.S. baptist fire. I’ll tell you this – anybody could learn a thing or two about public speaking from these gentlemen. No Powerpoint here, folks – these men are captivating in and of themselves. And again, although heavily slanted towards traditional definitions of family, home, faith and morality, these talks were full of broadly-applicable life lessons. There was a lot to be learned about trust in oneself and one’s peers, looking out for your neighbours, and guarding against all manner of, for the want of a better term, evils.

Built for Battle, Hershey Centre, Mississauga 2011
Shot from a location that was still in bounds (just).

And then there was the music. A full-on rock band on stage, headed by Promise Keepers’ National Worship Leader Andrew Thompson, with Irish Christian musician Robin Mark as a guest. Once again, not exactly what you’d find on my iPod, but these guys can absolutely cook, and with an enthusiastic audience that’s ready and willing to participate – well, the results were certainly uplifting, if not shiveringly magical at times. Music to empower faith, indeed.

Percussionist in blue - Seppo Salminen
The always popular “behind the percussionist” point of view.

As for the photography – well, I mentioned that I’d shot this event last year, so I had some idea of what to expect. Dim lighting, viewpoints that varied from interesting to just plain difficult, on-stage performers in constant motion, and a requirement to shoot without flash so as to avoid being distracting. All of this meant using very wide apertures, high ISO sensitivity, and as slow a shutter speed as possible. Translated, that meant pushing the camera to get as much light into it as possible, while increasing the chance of blurred motion and grainy, gritty image quality. The day became a protracted balancing act, keeping one eye on the shutter speed and the other on the subject, waiting for the lights to transiently flicker up and the speakers to pause for dramatic effect. Wait, wait, wait – click. Fortunately, my life was easier this year, as John had brought along another of our racing comrades, Patrick, who was working from the same shot list as I was. Two bullets in the gun, so to speak, and we were able to tag-team when there were multiple things going on that needed attention.

On Stage, Hershey Centre, November 2011
There was on-stage access at a few times – which is always fun.

In all, the day turned out well and Patrick, John and I managed to re-live a little of our fun racing times in the summer. We nailed a lot of photos. The ones I missed, Patrick got, and vice versa. Done and dusted. And the event was, once again, a nice reminder to me that there are an awful lot of different ways of looking at the world, either through the lens, or not.

[The full Built for Battle 2011 photo set is here.]

Posted in Fun, Hobbies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Week 7, in which we discover that Ricardipus perhaps isn’t quite as good at this hockey pool malarkey as he’s always claimed, but doesn’t quite learn to get over it yet.

That was, and I believe this is the correct way to put it, The Week of TEH SUCKAGE™.

Looking over the weekly stats, it seems that Beth smoked everyone, even the reliably excellent Lavaland. Mr. E Man (cleverly disguised here as “arkmennis”) is doing a bit better than usual, Cath’s in the middle, and the rest of you are here, there, and everywhere.

Week 7 Results

Week 7 Results

With a couple of obvious exceptions, of course. Bob, often near the top of the standings despite his tendency to pick only players with excessive numbers of i’s and u’s in their surnames, had a pretty dismal week. And then there’s me. I have no idea what happened, especially considering that I actually led the whole shebang for half a day or so last week.

If nothing else, this highlights how variable things are this early in the season – single weeks can bounce people all around the standings, and this week I’m back near the top again.

Here are the overall standings for the past two weeks, in glorious Excel ugliness. Please ignore the flabby slope representing my results.

Posted in Fun, Guest posts | Tagged , , , , , | 12 Comments

Motorsport, Astrophysics, and a Nobel Laureate (peripherally)

One nice aspect of living (virtually) at Occam’s Typewriter is the diversity of authors. Though many (most? all?) have backgrounds present employment in science, the variety of topics in any given week provides for some fun reading. But there are certainly some common threads, not least because everyone here reads everyone else’s posts. The cross-pollination of discussions and topics is, at times, astounding in its energy.

One hot topic, as many of you know, is career paths, particularly given uncertain times for science funding in many (most? all?) of the jurisdictions in which we (physically) live. Erika, for example, just wrote a nice piece as a reminder that industry is an alternative to academia. Sylvia’s recent discussion of career options for post-docs is a good read too, as are any number of Athene’s posts, often focusing on gender inequality. And then there are the rest of the Occam’s Typewriter crew, often writing about careers, the interplay with “real” life, and future options. Try Jenny, or Richard, or Steve for a start. And when you’re done there, toddle on over to Stephen’s blog and watch his excellent film, I’m a Scientist. There’s lots more discussion of career paths, and the inevitable roots and rocks that you can trip over, in the other Occam’s Typewriter blogs too.

All of which is a roundabout way of getting to this, an example of a science career that is absolutely tailor-made for me to shoehorn together three of my favourite things into one gloriously amalgamated homonculous homonculus conglomeration of a post:  motorsports, photography, and science. Via Twitter, I was alerted to a nice article in the New York Times’ Wheels blog,  beautifully titled Johns Hopkins Student Applies Dark Energy to the Black Art of Racing.

Dyson Racing Lola Mazda, Mosport 2011
Finally, an excuse to post a photo of a race car.

It seems that an enterprising Johns Hopkins student, one Dillon Brout, has spent the last season employed by one of my favourite endurance racing teams, Dyson Racing of the American Le Mans Series. Mr. Brout, the article goes on to state, joined his skills in analysis of complex data sets with a love of motorsport, helping the Dyson crew to secure the top-level Le Mans Prototype 1 (LMP1) series championship for 2011. Now, you could perhaps argue unfair advantage, since Brout’s training came from arguably one of the best possible places for making sense of disparate and complicated streams of data:  the lab of Dr. Adam Riess, who just recently picked up a Nobel Prizefor the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the Universe through observations of distant supernovae”.

So how does this relate to racing? Well, race cars undergo all kinds of forces and stresses, and the best teams collect reams of real-time data from sensors all over the car – in the engine, measuring stresses on suspension components, monitoring tire temperature and pressure, fluid levels, electrical systems, fuel consumption – dozens of potentially important indicators of performance. Track position and adherence to the racing “line” around the track are logged. In some forms of racing, driver biometrics (heart rate, for example) are also carefully examined. These data and many more are collected on the fly, and are also written to memory cards that in long endurance races are swapped out during pit stops, so that the race engineer and other team members can get busy with analysis as the car heads back out on to the track. Clearly, it’s not all about throwing some fuel in, banging some new tires on, and driving like the wind. Racing these days is incredibly high-tech, particularly in the LMP1 class, where cars contain almost voodoo levels of proprietary technology. The Dyson Lola coupe pictured above, for example, runs a custom-built 2.0 litre turbocharged Mazda engine, running on isobutanol – a fuel that has some promise as a more environmentally friendly alternative to corn-distilled ethanol and petroleum products. Building such a thing isn’t easy, and getting it to run at full bore for two, three, six, twelve, or even twenty-four hours is distinctly non-trivial.

Oryx Dyson Racing, morning warm-up, Mosport 2011
Even worse, he had to deal with the second team car as well.

So that’s where a smart cookie like Dillon Brout comes in, bringing some serious data-bashing acumen to the table. It’s about as alternative a career for an astrophysics researcher as I can think of, but I can imagine that should he wish to pursue it, the big players in the racing world may be very interested indeed in this young man.

Posted in Careers, Hobbies | Tagged , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

I am proud to be one of them.

On futzing around, looking for something else, I came across a letter to the editor of The Times, written by the redoubtable Lt. Colonel Alfred Daniel Wintle in 1946. Wintle, a fabulously eccentric yet quintessentially English gentleman (and yes, I recognize that those two things are not necessarily mutually exclusive) had a colourful life. Among his exploits were “enlisting” at the age of 16 and fighting in the First World War (although it is unclear whether he actually officially signed on or not), resulting in the award of the Military Cross. He spent a stint in the Secret Service, serving in occupied France in the Second World War. On being captured, he promptly escaped, apparently convincing the entire Vichy French garrison to join the resistance in the process.

But by far his most famous episode was being thrown in the Tower of London (then a military prison), for threatening an RAF officer with his revolver, ostensibly to try and secure an airplane with which to join the French Air Force in attacking German troops occupying France. The ensuing story, in which he wrote and signed his own arrest warrant, apparently lived like a king in the Tower, and ultimately was acquitted of (almost) all charges, in part through producing a list of people he felt should be shot for the betterment of Britain (including some senior politicians), is fabulous. Some of Wintle’s escapades are documented in the excellent Most Secret War, and in the TV movie “The Last Englishman”.

All this, though, pales by comparison with this absolute gem of a letter, which falls squarely in the “I wish I’d written that” category. It’s practically Oscar Wilde in its brevity. It reads:

Sir,
I have just written you a long letter.
On reading it over, I have thrown it into the waste paper basket.
Hoping this will meet with your approval,

I am
Sir
Your obedient Servant

Sheer brilliance. And it’s so much like something I might have written that it’s scary. I’m very hazy on the relationship of Lt. Col. Wintle to myself, but if behaviour has anything to do with genetics, I’d say that the phenotype is very, very familiar.

[The original document, should you wish to see it, has been photographed and is online at Letters of Note.]

Posted in Guest posts | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

International Congress of Human Genetics – day 1

Palais des Congrès, Montréal
This is where it will all happen… tomorrow.

Well, day “minus one” really, since the thing doesn’t start until tomorrow.

Nevertheless, I have braved the Canadian Nationalized Train Service, and am now, after a long and interesting discussion with a mathematician from Dalhousie University, who (a) happened to be sitting next to me, and (b) knew what C. elegans is, in La Belle Province, specifically the city of Montréal.

Yes, I took the train, for a variety of reasons including convenience, lack of irritating security checks, and delivery to within walking distance of my supposedly very swishy, but really very ordinary, hotel.

Nevertheless, arriving nearly a full day early afforded me the opportunity to exercise my usual hobby of painting pictures with pixels. So here you are:

Rural Western Quebec
This is what rural western Quebec looks like, at speed.

And here is a tractor, panned at a stupidly slow shutter speed with a lens that doesn’t compensate for poor technique:

Tractor and trailers, rural Quebec, October 2011

Tomorrow, I am in a project meeting all morning, followed by an afternoon of the ICHG and a dinner meeting for said project. The rest of the week is a free-for-all of talks, posters, vendor-sponsored events, and all the rest of it. Wish me luck. I’ll be posting updates and photos and whatnot as I can.

Posted in Conferences, Guest posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Eye Candy Fractal Post

alien honeycomb
“Alien Honeycomb”

Henry’s recent post about music had the quite unexpected (I expect) result of spurring me to think again about a couple of old hobbies I’ve neglected for a while. One, the creation of super-excellent* electronic music, is something I’ve largely left behind since the arrival of a couple of Junior Ricardipi, lo these nearly 11 years since. Although I hung on for a while, the gear eventually was mothballed some time in late 2008. Henry’s post (and comment by Benoit) resulted in me thinking about doing some more, mainly as useful soundtrack material for movies created by one of the aforementioned Junior Ricardipi, and also in me posting some of it to SoundCloud for your listening pleasure.** I even hacked together a new piece, using only archived sound clips and a tiny little bit of newly-recorded sound, provided by a digital piano more frequently used by the other Junior Ricardipus.

But this post isn’t really about that – it’s about another old hobby that I serendipitously started thinking about again – the creation of digital artwork using fractals, occasionally beaten and battered after the fact with good old Photoshop. I haven’t done much of that recently, either, as I’ve been concentrating instead on photographing large quantities of high-speed automobiles, a pursuit you can read about in a bunch of blogposts at my other haunt, including this one, for example.

One nice thing about fractals is that they’re tantalizingly abstract, and you can pretend they’re all kinds of things – plants, lighting, clouds, whatever tickles your fancy. This one, for example, looks like neurons to me:

synaptic transmission
“Synaptic Transmission”

This one, on the other hand, makes me think of fish scales:

scales
“Scales”

Whereas this, after some pummeling with Photoshop and a few associated plugins, could be just about anything you want it to be:

arthropod parts
“Arthropod Parts”

Yes, I know this is basically just eye candy (or maybe you can come up with a less flattering description, if you try), but it was fun to do, and some of the resulting images may actually end up as backgrounds in a PowerPoint presentation or two that I need to do for work. That’s a pretty flimsy justification for spending (my own) time on this, but hey, it’s a hobby. Or it was, but now that Henry’s indirectly reminded me of it, maybe, just maybe, it will be again.

Many more, if you can bear it, in this Flickr set.

 

*with very small values for “super” and “excellent”

** with correspondingly small values for “pleasure”

Posted in Art, Hobbies | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments