Author Archives: Stephen

Your Invitation to the Open Access Debate

I said the open access debate had been torrid. And it continues apace in the wake of last week’s announcements from the UK government and RCUK, the organisation that represents the common interests of Britain’s Research Councils. This week at … Continue reading

Posted in Guardian, Open Access | Comments Off on Your Invitation to the Open Access Debate

UK Government Goes For Broke on Open Access

Well that was quick. Less than a month after the Finch working group published its recommendations on the future of open access, UK science minister David Willetts has responded, saying in effect “Let’s go for it.” The government has taken … Continue reading

Posted in David Willetts, Open Access, publishing, Science & Politics | Comments Off on UK Government Goes For Broke on Open Access

The Young Atheist’s Handbook by Alom Shaha

Don’t be misled by the title: this is a book about love. Love for life, love for family and love for curiosity, which leads — circularly — to a love affair with books. Don’t be misled by the title: this … Continue reading

Posted in alom shaha, Atheism, book review, physics, religion | Comments Off on The Young Atheist’s Handbook by Alom Shaha

The Entrepreneurial State by Mariana Mazzucato

This is not new since Mariana Mazzucato’s breezy pamphlet, The Entrepreneurial State, was published a year ago, but it was new to me. I’ve just finishing reading it, having snagged one of the copies that she brought to June’s fascinating Science Question … Continue reading

Posted in economics, Science & Politics, Science Is Vital, Science policy | Comments Off on The Entrepreneurial State by Mariana Mazzucato

Open Access by Peter Suber

There has been a fairly torrid debate over open access over the last six months (even longer for aficionados). For people who look in only occasionally it must seem like a storm that swirls around the same arguments time and … Continue reading

Posted in book review, kindle, Open Access | Comments Off on Open Access by Peter Suber

Open Access: Who Pays the Copy-editor?

My article on open access in the New Scientist provoked an email from copy-editor Miranda Potter. Starting from the article’s mention of my recent paper in PLoS ONE, she raises the question of who is going to pay for copy-editing … Continue reading

Posted in Open Access, quality, science publishing | Comments Off on Open Access: Who Pays the Copy-editor?

An Eye for an Eye

I have the feeling that there have been too many words on this blog of late. I need a break and wonder if the beleaguered reader does too. Since I happened to be in the sunshine on London’s South Bank … Continue reading

Posted in Fun, London Eye | Comments Off on An Eye for an Eye

Finch Report: the question of costs

Last week, having quickly digested the executive summary of the Finch Report on open access (OA), I told you it was complicated. I’ve now read the report in its entirety, along with a large swathes of blogospheric commentary. I’m still decidedly of the view … Continue reading

Posted in elsevier, Finch Report, Open Access, Science & Politics, Science policy | Comments Off on Finch Report: the question of costs

Rubicon

This is a big deal for me: my first ever article in New Scientist – a magazine that I read in the library in Ballymena as a teenager. Pardon me for preening a little. What’s it about?

Posted in Blogging, new scientist, Open Access, Science & Media | Comments Off on Rubicon

The Finch Report on open access: it’s complicated

A committee set up by government was never going to foment a revolution. And so it has proved to be. The recommendations of the Finch Report released today mark a cautious, measured step in the right direction, but it is nevertheless … Continue reading

Posted in Open Access | Comments Off on The Finch Report on open access: it’s complicated