Recent Comments
- Sylvia McLain on Book and movie reviews – for fun
- Adam Hatchl on Book and movie reviews – for fun
- Steve Drevik on Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
- Sylvia McLain on Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
- rpg on Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
-
Recent Posts
- Regency Restoration Part 2 – Who doesn’t love a good old Regency tiled floor?
- Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
- Diversity? Who needs your diversity, we already know we are the smartest people in the room.
- On Serena (not the Tennis player) and the Smokies. Read the book, avoid the film.
- On double standards – in Tennis and otherwise
Archives
- October 2019
- October 2018
- September 2018
- March 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- May 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- May 2016
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
Meta
Blogroll
Category Archives: science writing
Am I having impact?
For the last few days there has been some buzz around the non-use of Impact Factors as a criteria for the UK’s Research Excellent Framework. Richard Catlow (head of the Chemistry REF panel) put it in writing here in an … Continue reading
Posted in Impact Factor, science writing, scientific publishing
Tagged Impact factor, scientific publishing
2 Comments
Let me give you some advice….
on advice If I were to offer a new academic advice it would be to not be afraid to take advice from your colleagues; especially with respect to writing. I was talking to one of my collaborators the other day … Continue reading
Enough with the criticism already
Ever wonder why scientists are odd? For the record, I don’t think scientists are really odd, any more than any group of people can be called ‘odd’, as Micheal Crichton said ‘in my experience scientists are very human people.’ Leaving … Continue reading
Why can’t we write like other people write?
Another blog about scientific writing appeared on Friday by Adam Ruben. It contains all of the standard complaints, albeit in a humorous way, about why scientific writing is basically dull, turgid and opaque. Adam concludes that: But there’s a reason … Continue reading
