Daily Archives: 19 July 2011

Should we fund projects or people?

Its a question put out there by Times Correspondent Hannah Devlin on Twitter. I think the answer is a resounding, projects, projects can I say it again projects. Idealistically it is certainly true you should fund the best people: I … Continue reading

Comments Off on Should we fund projects or people?

Citing wrong ‘uns

Quite a bit of attention has been focused on article retractions since Ivan Oransky launched his Retraction Watch blog last year. One recent discussion in blogworld looked at when a retraction is warranted and what a retraction means. Dr Isis … Continue reading

Posted in Information skills, Journal publishing | Comments Off on Citing wrong ‘uns

In which I can put it off no longer

Summer has slipped away from London, as it seems to do every year around this time – the air has an autumnal coolness and raindrops patter against lab windows. We Londoners work around this, as we do around so many … Continue reading

Posted in careers, The profession of science | Comments Off on In which I can put it off no longer

It is what it is

As a scientist who spends a lot of time looking at data, I sometimes feel that we venture into an area where we are in danger of over-interpreting our results. On the one hand, it is a perfectly natural and … Continue reading

Posted in ball-into-the-back-of-the-net, education, eric idle, european football, humor, idee fixe, john cleese, monty python, philosophical overtones, Proustian display of modern existentialist football, Research, science, Silliness, thick-headed footballers and scientists | Comments Off on It is what it is