Recent Comments
- Sylvia McLain on Book and movie reviews – for fun
- Adam Hatchl on Book and movie reviews – for fun
- Steve Drevik on Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
- Sylvia McLain on Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
- rpg on Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
-
Recent Posts
- Regency Restoration Part 2 – Who doesn’t love a good old Regency tiled floor?
- Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
- Diversity? Who needs your diversity, we already know we are the smartest people in the room.
- On Serena (not the Tennis player) and the Smokies. Read the book, avoid the film.
- On double standards – in Tennis and otherwise
Archives
- October 2019
- October 2018
- September 2018
- March 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- May 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- May 2016
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
Meta
Blogroll
Author Archives: Sylvia McLain
Am I having impact?
For the last few days there has been some buzz around the non-use of Impact Factors as a criteria for the UK’s Research Excellent Framework. Richard Catlow (head of the Chemistry REF panel) put it in writing here in an … Continue reading
Posted in Impact Factor, science writing, scientific publishing
Tagged Impact factor, scientific publishing
2 Comments
Let me give you some advice….
on advice If I were to offer a new academic advice it would be to not be afraid to take advice from your colleagues; especially with respect to writing. I was talking to one of my collaborators the other day … Continue reading
What’s in a name?
I had a boyfriend back in the day who wrote music semi-professionally. The best bit of composing a piece of music, according to the boy, was the creative process with another person – that toing and froing of thoughts and … Continue reading
On portrayals of women in science(y) films
There is a feminist critical film theory from the 70’s that pointed out (rather astutely) that in many films women where just there to be looked at. Men did stuff, women were present either for visual pleasure, or simply as … Continue reading
Posted in women, women in science, women in science films
Tagged Women in Film, women in science
11 Comments
The pressure of high-impact
High impact papers, h-indexes and pedigree. These are all things I have been forced to think about lately. I have recently completed two grant applications. For each of them, I had to write the cringe-worthy section on myself and how … Continue reading
Posted in h-index, high impact publications, REF
Tagged h-index, high impact publications, REF
32 Comments
Back in the day…..
The first questioned often asked in a PhD defense is ‘what was your favorite part of your PhD?’ My answer? Building an HF/F2 line. It took me almost a year to complete. I spent the better part of the first … Continue reading
Gantt charts, work plans and funding research
I spend four hours yesterday making a chart. Really. It was a Gantt chart. For those of you not familiar with a Gantt chart this is what they look like: According to Wikipedia – source of all modern knowledge – … Continue reading
Like butter over too much bread….
Beginning of the year Forbes published its Ten Least Stressful Jobs of 2013. Number 1? University professor with a helpful salary guide – median (US) salary $62,000/year – just in case someone decides they might want to change jobs immediately. … Continue reading
Books I read in 2012 – an amateur’s review
US Congress has just kicked the fiscal can down the road. Global debt worries are abated. Well for now anyway. Instead of obsessively reading reports from the USofA – or in reality in addition to reading reports from the USofA … Continue reading
Evidence-based policy is a good thing – but please proceed with caution.
Science is full of observable facts. Fact, when I drop a hammer off the top of the Shard, it’s going to fall to the ground. It doesn’t matter if I drop it or Brian Cox drops it (either Brian Cox) … Continue reading
Posted in evidence based, UK Science policy
Tagged evidence-based policy, Evidence-based thinking
2 Comments