On the difference

When something unusual happens, perhaps like for example (completely at random) one’s weblog post at NN getting 20 comments, an ordinary person might say, or think, “Cool! Lots of traffic!”.

A scientist, on the other hand, is more likely to rub his beard and say
“Hmm, I can think of an experiment. . .”

(Image from xkcd )

About rpg

Scientist, poet, gadfly
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to On the difference

  1. Bob O'Hara says:

    Nope, sorry. You’re not going to get any comments on this post.

  2. Henry Gee says:

    I agree with Bob.

  3. Graham Steel says:

    I don’t have a comment – sorry

  4. Martin Fenner says:

    Not this time.

  5. Richard P. Grant says:

    Well, it’s only n = 1, and I haven’t thought about controls.

  6. Maxine Clarke says:

    Nothing to say.

  7. Henry Gee says:

    Not only do I agree with Bob, I agree with Graham, Martin and Maxine. And as everyone agrees with everything, it seems hardly worth leaving a comment, really.

  8. Henry Gee says:

    Oh, whatever

  9. Richard P. Grant says:

    You’re wrong, of course.

  10. Henry Gee says:

    And you’re right, too! Doh.

  11. Graham Steel says:

    Being no commenter # 9, here is no comment from Chanel Nine Neus They have no comment really but wish to be on record in the no comment front.

  12. Samuel Frankel says:

    Your post shocked me, I think it needs to be grounded.

  13. Henry Gee says:

    While I wouldn’t wish to comment (I’m a constitutive lurker, me), I agree with Samuel. This whole discussion needs to be brought down to earth.

  14. Bronwen Dekker says:

    I, too, agree that there are unlikely to be any further comments on the “difference” subject as a whole; though I would like to point out that “need” is a strong word.

  15. Henry Gee says:

    I was going to say something else here but, you know, I’ve forgotten what it was.

  16. Henry Gee says:

    Ah … I know, it’s …

  17. Henry Gee says:

    Nope. Gone again.

  18. Richard P. Grant says:

    The inexorable advance of Alzheimer’s. A tragedy in the making.

  19. Henry Gee says:

    Excuse me Madam, but does this bus go to the station?

  20. Bronwen Dekker says:

    Yes dear, of course it does. Now settle down and finish your biscuit.

  21. Bob O'Hara says:

    Do you think we should tell him it’s the fire station it goes to?

  22. Bronwen Dekker says:

    shsh
    (whispered… not yet… )

  23. Henry Gee says:

    Why am I being sprayed with water and being told to slide down this shiny metal pole? It could either be Abu Ghraib Prison or Paul Raymond’s Revue Bar, but it sure as hell ain’t no bus stop.

  24. Heather Etchevers says:

    Do share your conclusions, Richard. Remember, science is about communicating your results, too.

  25. Richard P. Grant says:

    I conclude you’re all mad. MAD I say.

  26. Henry Gee says:

    Mad? MAD? A bit irritable first thing in the morning, perhaps, but not MAD.

  27. Bob O'Hara says:

    Mad? I’m as sane as the next man.

  28. Bronwen Dekker says:

    Who me?
    (very sweetly)
    Would you like another biscuit?

  29. Raf Aerts says:

    _ _

  30. Bob O'Hara says:

    (1,2,3,4,1,7)

  31. Richard P. Grant says:

    sub sequence_to_position {
    foreach (0 .. $#array_of_splice_sites) {
    foreach (0 .. length()) {
    .= substr(, (+17), 1);
    }
    }
    }

  32. Bob O'Hara says:

    Ah, Richard, now you’re trying to scare us.
    My last comment was a crossword clue, stolen from the Daily Telegraph.

Comments are closed.