On awards

12 Responses to On awards

1. Henry Gee says:

   17 June 2009 at 11:33

   Doesn’t say which century, though, does it?
2. Richard P. Grant says:

   17 June 2009 at 12:39

   Oooh hark at you.
3. Craig Rowell says:

   17 June 2009 at 14:14

   Sounds like Henry is holding out for Editor of the Century.
4. Henry Gee says:

   17 June 2009 at 14:37

   Again, I ask – which century? I choose the 18th.
5. Grace Baynes says:

   17 June 2009 at 15:02

   OK, OK, ‘of the last 100 years’ is more accurate. 1909-2009
6. Richard P. Grant says:

   17 June 2009 at 15:12

   That’s a shame. I was hoping Nature would be the journal of the Millennium.
7. Bob O'Hara says:

   17 June 2009 at 15:49

   Henry can edit the 18th century as much as he likes, just as long as it doesn’t lead to dancing.
8. Maxine Clarke says:

   17 June 2009 at 18:15

   It is, Richard, this one and every one in the future 😉
9. Richard P. Grant says:

   17 June 2009 at 20:01

   I amazed it’s taken this long.

   And on the second Day, YHWH created Nature, and saw that it was very good.
10. Beta Gal says:

    17 June 2009 at 23:31

    What makes you so sure a page won’t be torn from Nature and mixed with some soil to generate a superior journal on the third day?
11. Richard P. Grant says:

    18 June 2009 at 00:29

    oooo. Good point. Someone give that girl a job.
12. Sabbi Lall says:

    18 June 2009 at 14:06

    which century? I choose the 18th
    Well Nature Structural Bio/NSMB has been around since 1994, and was in the top 100….

Comments are closed.