I heaved a sigh of relief today. My last journal subscription wrinkle of 2009 has finally been ironed out. It’s a pretty big wrinkle (the big deal of one of the big four publishers) and needed a mighty iron to smooth it down but now, only four months late, we have access to that big deal. I won’t mention the publisher, but I expect any academic librarian will guess who I am talking about.
They are the new behemoth on the block – the product of a merger a couple of years ago. This is the first year that they have fully merged their operations, and it has been a very painful process. The first step was merging the two electronic platforms, meaning the URLs for half the journals needed to change. But that was simple compared to merging the two commercial operations. Two different sets of customer records, two different ways of calculating prices for their big deal, two different sets of staff. All these had to be battered into submission carefully molded into a single operation. I feel for the staff of the publisher, who have had an enormous job to sort out all of the complications.
In the past we used to sort out journal renewals in September and October, and perhaps up to November for any tricky issues, plus odd problems that might come to light in January. These days we often are still at it until February.
Sorting out the details of a big deal is always time-consuming and fiddly. In this case it didn’t help that I went away on holiday just days after I received the initial offer from this publisher. But then it didn’t help that the offer, for calendar year 2009, only arrived a week before Christmas 2008. It was never going to be settled in time for 1ate Jan 2009. One highly confusing spreadsheet and a few phone calls later, I began to understand how the deal might work and I started the tricky job of explaining to the other libraries in my group how it might work for them. Four more spreadsheets later and I-don’t-know-how-many more emails and phone calls, and I was ready for the last step – explaining it all over again to the person who has to sign the contract. That happened last week and this morning the access is fully operational.
I am comforted that fellow librarians across the country, and indeed across the world, have all been experiencing similar frustrations with this deal – it’s good to know that you don’t suffer alone.
In the light of this, the April Fool’s day joke about publishing mergers was quite scary. Imagine a merger on this scale – we would probably still be sorting out the details in September!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Frank Norman on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Mary Crickard on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Frank Norman on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Patti Biggs on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Frank Norman on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
Archives
- April 2025
- March 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- September 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- April 2023
- April 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- June 2021
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- March 2016
- April 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Categories
- AI
- Archives
- Art
- Authorship
- Bibliographic management
- Bibliometrics etc
- Biographical
- Blogology
- Books
- Collections
- Communicating science
- Copyright and IP
- Crick
- Document delivery
- E-books
- Education
- Ethics
- Family
- Film
- Film and music
- Friends
- Froth
- Future of Libraries
- History
- Information skills
- Journal publishing
- Language
- Libraries and librarians
- Management
- Mentoring
- Metadata
- Music
- Open Access
- Open Science
- Peer review
- Preprints
- Reading recommendations
- Research Councils
- Research data
- Research management
- Research tools
- Scientific literature
- Searching
- Social networking
- Uncategorized
- Wikipedia
- Women
- Writing
Blogroll
Meta
Does this mean that online access for 2009 has only just started?
They have been quite good at “gracing” access, so much has been available. There have been some difficulties – where issues appear ahead of their issue date (e.g. April issue comes out in Feb), so are out of range of the grace period allowed. Also, we only previously had a big deal with one of the merged companies so our access to the other half of the journals has only just started. It has been quite disruptive, and unpredictable. I lost count of how many times I said “Oh, I’m working on that. It should be available soon”.
Do their initials start with W and B?
Jenny – you might say that, but I couldn’t possibly comment.
heh heh…I used to work for journals that had W for a publishing partner, so it’s old news to me. Glad you’ve managed to Tame the Beast.
what a great piece of news!