The International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers has published, The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing, a follow-up to their 2006 report, Scientific publishing in transition: an overview of current developments.
I’m not the biggest fan of this publishers’ organisation, but I think this is a useful report for anyone interested in journals. The press release says that the report “shows that scholarly communications are undergoing profound changes driven by technology and economic factors, while authors’ core motivations to publish remain stable”. Well, you probably knew that already, but it’s hard to give a one-line summary of a 68-page report.
Written by Mark Ware (of Mark Ware Consulting) and Michael Mabe (of stm) the report has a good overview of how journals and scholarly communication work, why researchers publish, the business side of journals, global trends in research publishing, reading patterns and navigation, ethical issues, open access, and new technology. In short, it is a scholarly review of just about everything that has happened in the journals world in the last three years. For anyone who follows these things there is little new, but it’s helpful to have it all in one place and the four page bibliography gives original sources for everything it covers.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Frank Norman on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Mary Crickard on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Frank Norman on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Patti Biggs on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Frank Norman on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
Archives
- April 2025
- March 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- September 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- April 2023
- April 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- June 2021
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- March 2016
- April 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Categories
- AI
- Archives
- Art
- Authorship
- Bibliographic management
- Bibliometrics etc
- Biographical
- Blogology
- Books
- Collections
- Communicating science
- Copyright and IP
- Crick
- Document delivery
- E-books
- Education
- Ethics
- Family
- Film
- Film and music
- Friends
- Froth
- Future of Libraries
- History
- Information skills
- Journal publishing
- Language
- Libraries and librarians
- Management
- Mentoring
- Metadata
- Music
- Open Access
- Open Science
- Peer review
- Preprints
- Reading recommendations
- Research Councils
- Research data
- Research management
- Research tools
- Scientific literature
- Searching
- Social networking
- Uncategorized
- Wikipedia
- Women
- Writing
Blogroll
Meta
Thanks for this, Frank – looks like useful bedtime reading in advance of ScienceOnline 2010
Henry – it might be a bit too exciting for bedtime …
It’s OK, I’ll be lying down.
Good night Henry, having a reparative sleep.
I hope you do not have nightmares ….. ta, ta, ta, ta.
I’m writing a paper on this topic, so I appreciate the link to the report!
Glad to be of help Sue!