I sometimes have to hunt through old Annual Reports of the Medical Research Council to look for snippets of history about people or research and it is often striking how the broad themes addressed are still with us today.
Take this, for example, from the 1923-24 MRC Annual Report (p.19)
.bq The Council would here point again, as they have on previous occasions, to the dangers of estimating scientific progress, over short as opposed to long periods, in terms of practical results. These dangers beset all bodies having the disposal of funds for research purposes. The tempting direct attack upon an urgent problem of disease may, or may not, be long, wasteful, and fruitless. The apparently academic and unpractical work of today may give the key to a score of old problems and lead at once to new and unexpected powers. Faith must be put unreservedly in the scientific workers themselves. The best and earliest success can only come from their free and disinterested work, in pursuit of clues that may lie here or there. …recent history shows that sterility is soon reached when scientific work is tied to particular practical issues and ceases to be a free search for knowledge as such.
Amen to that!
This issue is fundamental, and has been for over 85 years.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Frank Norman on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Mary Crickard on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Frank Norman on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Patti Biggs on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
- Frank Norman on My lovely sister, 1946-2025
Archives
- April 2025
- March 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- September 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- April 2023
- April 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- June 2021
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- March 2016
- April 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Categories
- AI
- Archives
- Art
- Authorship
- Bibliographic management
- Bibliometrics etc
- Biographical
- Blogology
- Books
- Collections
- Communicating science
- Copyright and IP
- Crick
- Document delivery
- E-books
- Education
- Ethics
- Family
- Film
- Film and music
- Friends
- Froth
- Future of Libraries
- History
- Information skills
- Journal publishing
- Language
- Libraries and librarians
- Management
- Mentoring
- Metadata
- Music
- Open Access
- Open Science
- Peer review
- Preprints
- Reading recommendations
- Research Councils
- Research data
- Research management
- Research tools
- Scientific literature
- Searching
- Social networking
- Uncategorized
- Wikipedia
- Women
- Writing
Blogroll
Meta
Another great find Frank (your second today!)
If only we could get the government (and the RCs) to take on board the wisdom of “Faith must be put unreservedly in the scientific workers themselves.”
Thanks, Stephen. Yes, I thought that sentence might be popular!
Wow, that’s almost word for word what Lord Rees was saying on the BBC’s Hard Talk last night. Perhaps he read your post, Frank.
Matt – I understand that he hangs on my every word 😉