On failure

What happened? Are you all too busy?

The “Science as Sport”:http://network.nature.com/people/UE19877E8/blog/2008/09/29/in-which-science-becomes-a-sport-–-hypothetically-speaking experiment seems to have fizzled out. Although a few people (nowhere near enough) enthusiastically joined up for the trial, they seemed to lose interest. Which is a shame because it was getting quite hot there for a while—I want to know what happened with Cameron’s protecting groups, Heather’s cells and Bob’s fit models.

“Our preliminary findings are that we need more data.”

And this science blogging “challenge”:http://network.nature.com/hubs/london/blog/2008/11/21/so-you’re-not-interested-in-a-free-trip-to-california-then thing?

So far, the response reminds me of a PE teacher’s brain (a vast, uninhabited desert with the occasional neuron crying because it’s lonely). I’m going to propose that me and the other guys on the judging panel split the prize money and go drinking instead.

Unless, in the three weeks that remain, you can persuade us otherwise.

About rpg

Scientist, poet, gadfly
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to On failure

  1. Katie - says:

    I can also be first!
    And have nothing to offer but great sympathy for the lonely, weeping neuron.

  2. Katherine Haxton says:

    Hmmmm…is it possible to produce measurable blogging results in three weeks that include the end of a very busy semester, Christmas and New Year?

  3. Richard P. Grant says:

    Well, you’re not likely to get any work done, are you?

  4. Stephen Curry says:

    The Science as Sport experiment
    You surely can’t be surprised at that outcome. Not for nothing does twitter rhyme with witter…
    OK the rhyme with friendfeed doesn’t work but I’m sure you get the point!

  5. Richard P. Grant says:

    I’ll cry. I bet you kick puppies, too.

  6. Stephen Curry says:

    I bet you kick puppies, too.
    Heavens, no!
    It’s much more amusing to give drugs to spiders… (you really have to see it to the end…)
    Now that’s a sport!

  7. Katherine Haxton says:

    I’m getting some work done, just not the work of research and scientific discovery. Then I plan to sleep through Christmas.
    Stephen – nice ‘web’ link…

  8. Cameron Neylon says:

    Actually you’ve inspired me to do the whole thing a little more seriously (sorry Stephen, look away now before it’s all too much!)

  9. Henry Gee says:

    Stephen, I’ve looked, so you don’t have to. It’s all too much.

  10. Stephen Curry says:

    Thanks for the warning Henry… my thoughts exactly. Though I’m not against the idea of trying to convey results in something close to real time…

  11. Richard P. Grant says:

    Oooh. Nice idea, Cameron.

  12. Cameron Neylon says:

    It struck me fairly early on that if you’re after generating news feeds then you just want them automatically coming out of the lab of their own accord. Others have done a nice job with code repository commits being “auto-blogged” or auto twittered. I should say the credit for this line of thinking (or at least where I got it from) lies firmly with Jeremy Frey’s group at Southampton University.

  13. Richard P. Grant says:

    you’re going to say ‘electronic notebooks’ very soon, aren’t you?

  14. Stephen Curry says:

    @Richard and Cameron
    Are you guys on drugs? Seriously, who is going to read stream of the moment records of your lab activities? Piping an automated lab-book entry for you won records is one thing but I’d rather have my science slowly distilled, like a fine whisky. Old Bushmills, since you ask.
    P.S. Cameron – hope to be at Diamond next Wed. Will probably be a bit frantic but are you around?

  15. Richard P. Grant says:

    I thought you said ‘whisky’, Curry. Bushmills? Bbbrrr.
    Anyway, this is for the journalists, remember?

  16. Stephen Curry says:

    Now I’m totally confused. You expect journalists to follow a friendfeed stream? Maybe the Sunday Times Insight team might have done that in their hey-day, while researching the back-story. But these days they want the story nicely packaged and thought out for them…
    Was there a point that I missed?

  17. Richard P. Grant says:

    No, I don’t think so Stephen: just my naivety.

  18. Heather Etchevers says:

    My cells died.

  19. Heather Etchevers says:

    From neglect, I might add, much as my participation in the FF room did. But I do sort of keep up my online lab notebook, and believe me, I’m not looking for hits (and a good thing, too, since there aren’t many). Just a kind of searchable log for myself. And because I know it will get up the nose of my administration if they ever stumble on it.

  20. Kristi Vogel says:

    My cells died
    I hate when that happens. 🙁
    Perhaps journalists could be embedded in research labs.
    (has an uncontrollable fit of giggling)

  21. steffi suhr says:

    @ Richard: from all I can tell based on my recent pokings in the science journalism world I am almost 100% certain that (unless maybe it’s a big, big, commissioned story for which the author is at leisure to dig up a lot of background) no science journalist, staff or freelance, or science editor will take the time to follow ‘some labs’ real-time stream.
    On one occasion, I actually pretty much got told the opposite: even research articles that are available with open access (and this is very different from science bloggers! go bloggers!!) don’t get looked at unless they’re ‘pushed’ by a universities or institution’s PR office.

  22. Richard P. Grant says:

    Excitement. There’s plenty of it. The tragedy of Heather’s cells: minidrama after the news.

  23. Eva Amsen says:

    See, other people, when bored with the Science as Sport FriendFeed room just stopped using the room. But I am dedicated: when I got bored with it, I didn’t want to just stop updating for no reason, but I quit lab work altogether, put in my defense request, and finished my program. I don’t leave things half-done!

  24. Richard P. Grant says:

    Ha, I can beat that—I left science completely!

  25. Cameron Neylon says:

    Stephen, no, I’m not expecting anyone outside of the lab to follow any of this unless they are really interested. But what can happen on Friendfeed is that if someone finds something particularly interesting then they can “like” it and promote it to the a more “mainstream” feed. If you like, that’s the process by which the distilling gets started. The current form is more like a silo full of hops and a vat of water…but some of the things that are starting to appear might be of interest – initial structure of ion channels and things like that.
    Unfortunately I won’t be up at Harwell next week because I’m going on holidays. Off to Oz for three weeks, sitting on beaches etc. Its a hard life but someone has to do it. But do give me a yell if you’re ever up on site and we can grab a coffee. Ideally not after you’ve done a 24 hour straight slot obviously

  26. Eva Amsen says:

    “I left science completely”
    I might have…? I don’t know. I have no clue what I’m doing right now. I’m calling it “Christmas Break” until that is no longer appropriate, and hope I figure stuff out before then.

  27. Richard P. Grant says:

    I hope you figure it out too!
    Best of luck, and enjoy Christmas. You’ve deserved it.

Comments are closed.