Although I’m not at the thing that’s going on in North Carolina, I do have my spies.
And my spies say the
Consensus seems to be that, outside of Nature Networks, science social networking sites are hopeless and useless
Although I’m not at the thing that’s going on in North Carolina, I do have my spies.
And my spies say the
Consensus seems to be that, outside of Nature Networks, science social networking sites are hopeless and useless
Damn – I don’t know how to play the trumpet…!
He seems to imply he will blog about the conference on Ars Technica… any idea where?
No Stephen–I tend not to read Ars.
That’s why I keep spies.
Someone also described NN today as “a nerdy Facebook”, which is a compliment in my book.
(Also, Henry misses you.)
Old news !
(Give that big lummox a kiss from me, Eva).
Aww, I didn’t see this in time. I gave him a hug, though. But it was my own. In a few months you can kiss Henry as much as you want xx =P
Um. Why do you think I asked you to do it?
You’re shy?
if that’s how you spell ‘scared’, yes!
Ha! “hopeless and useless”, I love it.
Absolutely no clue what Twitter is or how to use it though.
Or how to post to NN it appears (giggle).
There’s really one or two others, right? I got a visit from the Research Gate guy, Ijad Madisch, a few months ago, and he was effusively optimistic. I don’t know anyone who’s signed up yet, so I don’t know how it’s going. He does have a lots of people signed up, apparently.
I keep getting emails asking me to join various things. I mentioned ResearchGate once: I guess it’s time to update?
“There’s really one or two others, right?”
No! There are at least ten! I didn’t know either. And, well, that’s exactly the point.
This recently popped up on the Research Blogging feed.
The irony of linking a blog post critique of social media, on a science social networking site ….
For anyone who missed it, Richard is winding me up about my double-posted comment, which he has kindly deleted (after rubbing it in a bit).