I have to say, I disagree with Jenny’s post, and I’m going to disprove the alternative hypothesis for eight minutes.
I have disproved the null hypothesis that no-one will groan at this post.
(I was going to make a d’oh / dough pun, but I see you beat me to it)
I have no idea what you Brits (and ex-pat Brits) are on about.
Yeast works by creating little bubbles of CO2-filled gluten. Proving, then, is the formation of these bubbles. Disproving must therefore be the destruction of said bubbles. The person who does this is called a Popper.
😀
Ouch.
Comments are closed.
Scientist, poet, gadfly Creator and sustainer of Occam's Typewriter
email: rpgrant at gmail.com twitter: @rpg7twit home: rg-d.com
Buy me a coffee:
I have disproved the null hypothesis that no-one will groan at this post.
(I was going to make a d’oh / dough pun, but I see you beat me to it)
I have no idea what you Brits (and ex-pat Brits) are on about.
Yeast works by creating little bubbles of CO2-filled gluten. Proving, then, is the formation of these bubbles. Disproving must therefore be the destruction of said bubbles. The person who does this is called a Popper.
😀
Ouch.