Recent Comments
- Sylvia McLain on Book and movie reviews – for fun
- Adam Hatchl on Book and movie reviews – for fun
- Steve Drevik on Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
- Sylvia McLain on Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
- rpg on Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
-
Recent Posts
- Regency Restoration Part 2 – Who doesn’t love a good old Regency tiled floor?
- Regency restoration – Part 1, use the right product.
- Diversity? Who needs your diversity, we already know we are the smartest people in the room.
- On Serena (not the Tennis player) and the Smokies. Read the book, avoid the film.
- On double standards – in Tennis and otherwise
Archives
- October 2019
- October 2018
- September 2018
- March 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- May 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- May 2016
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
Meta
Blogroll
Category Archives: UK Science policy
Evidence-based policy is a good thing – but please proceed with caution.
Science is full of observable facts. Fact, when I drop a hammer off the top of the Shard, it’s going to fall to the ground. It doesn’t matter if I drop it or Brian Cox drops it (either Brian Cox) … Continue reading
Posted in evidence based, UK Science policy
Tagged evidence-based policy, Evidence-based thinking
2 Comments
Should we fund projects or people?
Its a question put out there by Times Correspondent Hannah Devlin on Twitter. I think the answer is a resounding, projects, projects can I say it again projects. Idealistically it is certainly true you should fund the best people: I … Continue reading
Death by a thousand cuts: is it time for a change?
Just in case I wasn’t paying enough attention to the news or even Twitter, last week I got an email from the EPSRC saying.. As a result of the 50% reduction to the Research Councils capital budget, EPSRC has taken … Continue reading
Scientists need to ask ‘important’ questions – oh and stop “whingeing”
Scientists need to ask ‘important’ questions – oh and stop “whingeing” Science question time on Feb 16th – put on by the Biochemical Society, CaSE (Campaign for Science and Engineering) and the good folks from Imperial College was, I thought, … Continue reading
Posted in Mark Walport, Science Question Time, UK Science policy
Tagged Mark Walport, SciQT, UK science policy
21 Comments
Science Funding cuts are political not a reflection of elitist science
In the US and the UK governments are making or threatening science education and funding cuts, is that partly the fault of scientists being ‘elitist’ ? Today is the first day of the new Republican Majority Congress in the US … Continue reading
On being a ‘foot soldier’
Or cannon fodder speaking out. In case you haven’t heard, science funding in the UK is under threat. From Paul Nurse, who said we need to fund only ‘excellent’ science to Vince Cable who thinks 45% of research in the … Continue reading
Posted in science, UK Science policy, Vince Cable
Tagged science funding, Science policy, Sir Paul Nurse, Vince Cable
1 Comment
Ensuring that there really will be no jam tomorrow-
STOP IT GEORGE OSBORNE Shutting down research facilities today? Does this mean Jam tomorrow? No! No! No! It’s short-sighted and stupid. Even Margaret Thatcher knew that… The ISIS facility in Oxfordshire (a neutron source in danger of being ‘mothballed’) was … Continue reading
China is becoming more progressive than the UK
So China just announced it is opening up its trade and (slowly) letting the Yuan float free – previously they have kept the Yuan fixed against the dollar, in part, to make exports to other countries cheap. This, I think, … Continue reading
Posted in China, economics, higher education, politics, UK Science policy
Tagged China, economics, higher education, UK science policy
Comments Off on China is becoming more progressive than the UK
Persevering against all odds is NOT the way forward
Beware of the hype.. Most of us love a good old perseverance, against all odds, pulling yourself up by your boot straps story. And there are thousands of them about scientific people – some apocryphal, some mythological and some of … Continue reading
Posted in science ethics, UK Science policy, women in science
Tagged funding, higher education, science funding, Science policy, women in science
1 Comment
Ivory towers, science and society
why it takes all kinds Ok it appears there is no more money – I mean science, research, business innovation, technology and higher education money, where both the US and the UK governments are making cuts. (see my previous post) … Continue reading
Posted in higher education, UK Science policy
Tagged higher education, Ivory towers, science funding, Science policy
2 Comments