I’ve written before on the phenomenon of new journals. I’m particularly fascinated by the way that families of titles develop. In recent months we have seen Science Signaling out of the AAAS stable, EMBO Molecular Medicine from EMBO, and Nature Chemistry from Nature Publishing Group (NPG). The latter title is just the latest in a long stream from NPG. In the last 15 years the growth of the Nature brand has been remarkable. I remember the first issue of the curiously titled Bio/technology in 1983, and the relief when the title changed in 1996 to Nature Biotechnology with no punctuation marks. (I wonder if there have been any other journals with unusual punctuation in their titles?). By then Nature Genetics and Nature Medicine had appeared, so the family was well-established. But new Nature babies kept appearing, making us Librarians pray for the publishing equivalent of birth control. Just as we thought all subject areas had been covered then in 2000 NPG started the Nature Reviews series with another seven titles, followed a few years later by the Nature Clinical Protocols series, now in the process of being rebranded as Nature Reviews. One of my colleagues recalls how happy she was when in 2002 NPG launched a new non-biomedical title (_Nature Materials_)- at last an NPG title that she didn’t have to subscribe to!
The most remarkable thing about this family of Nature-branded journals – now 32 strong by my count – is that the publisher has maintained excellence across all these titles. The original brand is not diluted but rather enhanced by the extensions. Someone in Crinnan Towers clearly knows their business (and that’s Business with a capital $).
The latest news from NPG to reach my ears is that they planning another launch, this time not in a specialised field but bang in the centre of science. It’s to be called Nature Science, with a mission “to place before the general public the grand results of advancing science, serving society”. They will also make their first foray into social sciences with the launch of Nature Economics, “to take part in a severe contest between intelligence and ignorance, giving early information of all advances made in any branch of Natural knowledge”. These two will be closely followed by Nature Royal, probably a joint venture between NPG and the Royal Society but possibly a step downmarket in a NPG and Hello! link-up. A bit later down the road we may see a move into the market for mother and baby magazines with NeoNature Nurture.
From further afield I hear of counter launches from AAAS – bringing out Science Nature – and from Pearson – bringing out The Economical Naturist.
NPG are also continuing their strategy of innovations in emerging communications technology, with the launch of Nature Twitter, specially designed to be compatible with the new Nature Phone – the N-Phone. Meanwhile, a group of radical OA activists have announced their plans to send out each weekly issue of Nature as a series of tweets, one sentence at a time. They call this Twitter Nature, or Twitcher for short.
.
.
.
.
.
And then I woke up, and took another paracetamol.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Richard Wintle on A choral coda
- Frank Norman on A choral coda
- Anita Mynett on A choral coda
- Beatrice Mikuzi on Diversithon – some recipes
- Laurence Cox on Diversithon – some recipes
Archives
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- April 2023
- April 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- June 2021
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- March 2016
- April 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Categories
- AI
- Archives
- Art
- Authorship
- Bibliographic management
- Bibliometrics etc
- Biographical
- Blogology
- Books
- Collections
- Communicating science
- Copyright and IP
- Crick
- Document delivery
- E-books
- Education
- Ethics
- Film
- Film and music
- Friends
- Froth
- Future of Libraries
- History
- Information skills
- Journal publishing
- Language
- Libraries and librarians
- Management
- Mentoring
- Metadata
- Music
- Open Access
- Open Science
- Peer review
- Preprints
- Reading recommendations
- Research Councils
- Research data
- Research management
- Research tools
- Scientific literature
- Searching
- Social networking
- Uncategorized
- Wikipedia
- Women
- Writing
Blogroll
Meta
I did advance the idea of Nature Science Fiction that would compete head- to head with established SF titles such as Interzone, F&SF and Asimov’s. The idea was politely declined.
My father, though, was very pleased when I joined Nature but disappointed when he found that it didn’t contain pictures of naked ladies cavorting healthily in the sunshine.
I’m sure it could be arranged.
I did receive a
crankinappropriate submission from some chap who wanted to tell us all about the evolutionary importance of human secondary sexual characters. To support his manuscript (this was in the days when people mailed mss to the office) he included a copy of a luridly pneumatic porn mag – with three extra copies, one for each of the referees. I mailed the whole package back. All of it.My Nature Crime Fiction proposal is under consideration by the board of directors as I write. Henry, maybe we should collaborate: Proc Nature Fiction S and Proc Nature Fiction C?
Great post, Frank – much better than the Guardian’s feeble attempt (newspapers to be replaced by Twitter). That is either not funny, or going to happen anyway, or obvious, or a combination.
Maxine – thanks! I was a bit worried that NPG might object to my bowdlerisation of their mission statement.
My Nature Crime Fiction proposal is under consideration by the board of directors as I write
🙂
I propose Nature erutaN to report palindromic gene sequences.
By the way, that was me, logged in in my events-entering guise.
Frank, my heart actually stopped when I saw the first line of this. Then I read, and laughed very hard. This is brilliant.
Please, please, I want a Twitcher!
Grace – I’m glad you laughed. I hope I didn’t reveal too many of NPG’s secret plans.