I don’t always hit cyclists…

…but when I do, I prefer the 600 block of West 10th Avenue.

It is… the Most Dangerous Block In The World.

Here’s an annotated map of my immediate surroundings. The compass points are where you’d expect them to be.

I cycle in from the East on the 10th Ave bike route, and turn right on Heather Street (another bike route) to get into my building (marked A). My commute is a total of about 6km, and I have a massively disproportionate number of my near misses with cars in the last block and a half of it . It is a very, very busy area in the mornings, especially now the Canada Line section of the SkyTrain is up and running. People are coming and going to work, the gym, the supermarket (access to the latter two sites is at the North-West corner of the green rectangle), trying to park before heading to the airport or downtown on the SkyTrain… and City Hall is just off the map to the East (I didn’t include it because the image was already too wide).

More importantly, there’s not enough off-street parking for patients coming to our clinical building over the road, and many of them use the metered parking on the surrounding streets. They might be coming in for a diagnosis, or for chemo, or radiation, and they’re understandably anxious and distracted. This adds up to an awful lot of people pulling in and out of parking spots without checking for bikes. Add in the overflow of Vancouver General Hospital patients and visitors (including extremely anxious and distracted people who just got a call telling them to come to Emergency RIGHT NOW), plus ambulances coming and going from VGH and our clinical building, and you have a recipe for disaster. The only thing I could possibly do that is more dangerous than cycling my current route would be to turn right one block earlier and try to make a left turn from Ash Street, on a steep downhill slope, into the back alley where the door that leads to the bike room and showers is located.

Oh well, when I (almost inevitably) get hit, like several of my colleagues (cyclists and pedestrians) before me, at least there’ll be lots of doctors around to help me. Which reminds me to be nice to my clinical colleagues, even though they’re the last ones to get their CVs to me before a grant deadline again.

Posted in cycling, rants, Vancouver | 17 Comments

Out! Out! Out!

On the day The Lancet finally retracted Andrew Wakefield’s vaccines / autism paper (six years after most of the co-authors), Facebook’s word capture feature decided to remind me of the importance of vaccination:
wordcaptcha
Excellent timing, Facebook!

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments

Principal Investigators Association

Does anyone have any experience with this organisation? Their website front page states that they are a not-for-profit organisation that is “helping leading researchers in all fields with their non-science duties and responsibilities” (emphasis theirs). I’ve somehow ended up on their mailing list, and get frequent emails with an advice column-style question and answer of the day. Some of it has been really good stuff, covering issues such as personnel and laboratory management. You know, the kinds of things that PIs are expected to know how to do despite never being offered any training.

Last week I was offered the chance to download a sample issue of the monthly newsletter, which usually costs $199 (members) or $267 (non-members) for 12 issues. The content was relevant and interesting, with some overlap with parts of my job description. It’s a US publication, with a US-centric content, but most of the articles were more or less applicable to other countries. However, the majority of the articles were very similar to the posts I can read for free on the various Prof-blogs out there.

Does anyone have a subscription? Is it worth the money? Or is it aimed more at PIs who aren’t familiar with the blogosphere?

(Realises that if the latter option is true, she’s asking the wrong crowd. Decides to cross-post on her other blog to increase the chances of finding a blogosphere-savvy PI with a subscription).

Posted in publishing, science | 9 Comments

Principal Investigators Association

Does anyone have any experience with this organisation? Their website front page states that they are a not-for-profit organisation that is “helping leading researchers in all fields with their non science duties and responsibilities” (emphasis theirs). I’ve somehow ended up on their mailing list, and get frequent emails with an advice column-style question and answer of the day. Some of it has been really good stuff, covering issues such as personnel and laboratory management. You know, the kinds of things that PIs are expected to know how to do despite never being offered any training.
Last week I was offered the chance to download a sample issue of the monthly newsletter, which usually costs $199 (members) or $267 (non-members) for 12 issues. The content was relevant and interesting, with some overlap with parts of my job description. It’s a US publication, with a US-centric content, but most of the articles were more or less applicable to other countries. However, the majority of the articles were very similar to the posts I can read for free on the various Prof-blogs out there.
Does anyone have a subscription? Is it worth the money? Or is it aimed more at PIs who aren’t familiar with the blogosphere?
(Realises that if the latter option is true, she’s asking the wrong crowd. Decides to cross-post on her other blog to increase the chances of finding a blogosphere-savvy PI with a subscription).

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Hockey pool, week 18

(ETA: this week’s points

 
Is that OK, Bob, or do I need a chart too?)

Did anyone else see the Canucks-Leafs game on Saturday?! What a game!* The Canucks were 3-0 down at the end of the first and pulled Luongo, but came back to win 5-3. Burrows’ shorthanded breakaway goal that started our comeback was a thing of beauty. The Sedins-Burrows line combined for 9 points (I got 7 ‘cos I don’t have Henrik, but I got one for Ehrhoff too). What a perfect way to start the longest road-trip in NHL history!**

The trade that followed the game is an interesting one. Our first reaction was that getting Phaneuf out of Calgary is a good thing. When we looked at the full details I didn’t know anything about some of the players involved, but Mr E Man groaned that “I think Calgary got the better end of this one”. Not good for those of us that share their division… although apparently the defensive prospect Keith Aulie who went to Toronto is very highly rated.

———-

*Sorry Chall. But as a Swede, you must be excited about how the Sedin twins are performing going into the Olympics! I know I’ll be scared of them if/when Sweden play Canada!

**Week night away games in Eastern time zones suck. They start at 4pm my time, and I don’t usually get home until 6.30 or 7. And we’ve lost the remote for the PVR 🙁

Posted in hockey pool 2009-2010, sport | 12 Comments

Ah, the joys of dual citizenship! (Winter Olympics pool sign-up thread)

Honestly, I am sooooo glad that my two countries are good at different sports!

The Olympics start in two weeks! Yay! Does anyone want to repeat the pool from Beijing?If so, please declare your country(s) and estimated medal count in the comments.

I’m going for Canada, with eight golds, seven silvers, and five bronzes. And, um, Team GB I guess. Two silvers (curling) and a bronze (skeleton).

Rules from last time:

Bragging rights will be assigned according to the number of medals per head of your country’s population (otherwise you Americans will win waaaay too easily). 3 points for each gold medal, 2 for silver, 1 for bronze. Declare your nationality if possible, but if this will breach your anonymity then you can just trash talk the rest of us and then tell us your country’s final score at the end. We’ll obviously have more than one person supporting some of the countries, so please predict the number of gold, silver and bronze medals your team will win. (Again you don’t have to declare the country, just let us know how closely you guessed. I’m assuming that we’re all honest!). I’ll use these predictions to award a winner in the almost inevitable case of a tie-break.

Posted in competition, sport | 28 Comments

Well, if Bob’s doing a caption competition…

Here’s a photo of my best scar, which looks like a winky smiley face. Story here [1]. please leave a caption, or a photo of your own scar, in the comments!
P1280002

1 I recycle my blog material for the good of the environment

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments

Memes as mental fibre

Right after EcoGeoFemme pointed out that there haven’t been many memes circulating recently, Amanda went and tagged me for one! The assignment is to write about seven things that I’ve never talked about in my blog.

This is a tricky one for me, because like in real life, I talk/blog too much and with too few filters. It’s easy enough to find seven things I’ve never written about, but that aren’t meaningful to me: porcupines, ravioli, WWII tank design, the history of ten pin bowling. My other initial reaction was to go too far in the other direction, into TMI territory, but luckily I decided to tone those ideas down (there still might be TMI for some people). So I present to you a mix of subjects I just haven’t got around to, and subjects I’ve tried to blog about before as a full post but couldn’t find the right angle, or that otherwise caused a severe case of writer’s block.

1) I have a rather impressive scar on the inside of my left arm.

I got it in a rather embarrassingly cliched middle class way, by falling off a pony at a riding lesson when I was seven and breaking my arm just above the elbow. Contrary to everyone’s first reaction, the main scar isn’t from the bone breaking through the skin (although I do have a much smaller scar from that – just barely visible in the photo, slightly above and to the right of the mole). It’s actually from the multiple surgeries I had to have to repair the blood vessels and nerves that the broken bone cut through at the point where they all bunch together at the elbow joint. My arm swelled up after one surgery, bursting a couple of stitches and stretching the scar tissue out, and it stretched further as I grew. I’m lucky to still have my arm at all; during one surgery that was supposed to last a couple of hours but was well into its seventh (my parents were freaking out at this point, as you can imagine), the surgeons discussed amputation as the best option. Luckily, they persevered and saved my arm. I was in traction for two weeks (apparently there’s a published case study about how they set up the traction apparatus – I remember them videoing it – but I can’t find it in PubMed), and it took a year or so of intensive physio before I could use my hand properly again. It still sometimes spazzes out on me and I lose my grip on whatever I’m holding with no warning: this is good in that it got me out of playing the viola in high school (the position I had to hold my wrist in seemed to aggravate the problem), but bad in that I once dropped an open 2L bottle of conc HCl while doing my undergrad research project, destroying my lab coat and a patch of the flooring. I’ve never held anything that scary in my left hand since, even though these incidents are much less common than they used to be.


I remember freaking out when I first saw the scar emerge from inside the cast I’d been wearing; it was hideously red and swollen and flaky and gross. I cried. A lot. However, I soon realised that I could use it to scare younger kids and chase them around the playground, and I almost always win “biggest scar” competitions. It’s in such a discrete location, and it’s faded and flattened so well, that people sometimes know me for years before they notice it, and it’s such a normal part of me now that I barely even remember it’s there. Also, the position of one of my moles makes it look like a winky smiley face.

Funnily enough, I have two friends with similar scars in the exact same place, following motorbike accidents. Motorbikes are much cooler than ponies.

OK, that one went longer than I’d intended… I’ll try to be more concise in the remaining six points!

2) I sometimes have dreams about people I know that make me think about them in a completely different way. Usually just for the next day, but sometimes permanently. These dreams are sometimes the first conscious sign of something going on subconsciously, e.g. that it was time to let one friendship fizzle out, or that a formerly platonic friendship was heading in a new direction that had to be addressed. But other times they’re just completely from left field and make me giggle with their weirdness.

There’s a episode of Friends where Phoebe finally remembers why she’s mad at Ross:

“Oh, come on! Yes… remember that time on the frozen lake? We were playing chess, you said I was boring, and then you took off your energy mask and you were Cameron Diaz! Okay, there’s a chance this may have been a dream”

I couldn’t find the clip on YouTube, but it sums up the latter category of dream perfectly.

3) Being around my friends’ babies has had a complicated effect on me: it’s made me feel very secure in my own decision not to have kids, but also made me less scared of an accident. We had a scare just before last summer’s baby boom (my previously 100% reliable record of years of 27 day cycles suddenly disappeared with an unprecedented 42 day cycle) and I totally freaked out. We had another scare in November, and I freaked out considerably less. Although there was still some freaking, obviously.

4) I always used to say that if I won the lottery, I’d still want to work. But the older I get, the more I think I’d just want to bum about, living on a boat (summer) and in a ski cabin (winter) and maybe dabbling in a little writing. I think this is the opposite of how you’re supposed to change as you get older.

5) I believe in ghosts. Well, I don’t not believe in ghosts. I don’t believe in the usual way; I don’t think there are self-aware / conscious spirits floating around, trying to avenge their own deaths or otherwise deliberately haunting the living because of unresolved issues from their lives. I cycle through the local cemetery in the dark all the time: I aint afraid of no ghost! (Campfire stories are another matter entirely). But too many people I know and trust have told me too many, too convincing stories. There are also too many examples of multiple people seeing the same thing in the same place and/or at the same time.

The most convincing stories are where the person sees a ghost that doesn’t interact with them. “This white apparition rose out of a grave and waved at me” doesn’t cut it. But the other stories do. For example, my Dad has a story about a fellow student from his hall of residence who died after breaking his neck in a rugby scrum. A few weeks later my Dad was walking past this student’s room (which had been emptied and locked up for the year; no-one else wanted to live there), and saw the dead guy open the door, walk out into the corridor, lock his room door behind him, and walk away without acknowledging my Dad, who was standing a few inches away with his mouth wide open. He says it was unmistakably, undeniably, definitely, the dead guy (in the dead guy’s clothes). This student definitely did not have a twin or any other similar looking relatives (my Dad knew him well enough to go to the funeral and meet his family).

Now, I’m no physicist, but I do try to read the complicated physics articles in New Scientist, and I know that our understanding of time is incomplete and there are some unresolved problems with the current theories. Is it possible that we might sometimes catch a glimpse of someone or something from the past? That my Dad, and other people I know and trust who have similar stories, somehow watched a play-back of a moment from this guy’s life, like watching a video?

I can almost hear Massimo (and any other physicists who read this) laughing at me right now.

Possible alternative explanations:

a) cognitive dissonance
b) my Dad is crazy
c) my Dad has repeatedly lied to me about this experience (I don’t think he his. You should see his face when he tells this story).
d) lots of other people are either crazy or lying
e) I’m crazy
f) I’ve watched too much sci-fi

6) Um. Baby porcupines are cute?

7) The sad demise of Mad Hatter’s blog had really got me thinking. I totally understand her reasons. Don’t worry / celebrate, I have no intentions of shutting down my blog. But blogging really is a trigger for wasting lots of time on the internet, time that would be better spent reading, writing, playing my guitar, and hanging with Mr E Man and the kitties. I spend a lot of time reading and commenting on blog posts, and I don’t want to stop completely, because I love it. You guys are my friends, and I want to know what you’re up to! Also, you can’t / shouldn’t be a blogger without also contributing to the community by reading and commenting on other people’s blogs.

I think the solution (for me) is to try and be more selective. I went through my Google Reader account yesterday and deleted some feeds. I pruned way back to the bare bones, i.e. I unsubscribed from eight blogs (and resubscribed to three of them this morning). It’s so hard! There are too many good blogs out there! So I think rather than reading fewer blogs, I need to read fewer posts on each blog. Almost every blog contains a mixture of things I’m really interested in, and things I’m less interested in (speaking of which, I do apologise for the recent flood of posts about Canadian politics. Please bear with me). For example, it’s now five years since I last held a pipette, and I really don’t have any useful, current advice to contribute to conversations about lab work and related aspects of the grad student / postdoc experience. Similarly, not being a prof or lecturer, I have nothing useful to contribute on posts about teaching methods and such.

So, if you see fewer comments and page hits from me, please forgive me! I’m still skim-reading in Google Reader, but applying more filters to my thorough reading and commenting. And I’ll always click through to celebrate your highs and commiserate with your lows.

Unless they’re about breaking a pipette while teaching.

————-

I tag: anyone willing to post their own scar photo!

Posted in blog buddies, career, family, freakishness, furry friends, medicine, meme, meta, personal, photos, silliness, the 2009 baby boom, TMI | 30 Comments

Curves and spin-offs

A number of “my” PIs are trying to develop novel predictive and prognostic biomarkers specific to different tumour subtypes. We have excellent resources for this kind of work, including extensive outcomes-linked tissue microarrays for immunohistochemical assessment of marker status and subsequent statistical analysis. However, the representation of some of the rarer tumour subtypes in these arrays is something we still need to work on.
At a meeting today, one of the stats guys handed the PI a group of Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on the expression of a candidate biomarker in different tumour subtypes. Some of the curves looked very promising indeed.
One of them looked like this:
kaplan
The PI said, “you know, I’ve seen spin-off biotech companies formed in response to curves like this. Personally, I think I’ll hold off”.
I want to see a Kaplan-Meier curve showing bankruptcy-free survival of the companies using such data, compared to the companies using actual good data.

Posted in Uncategorized | 19 Comments

Hockey pool, week 17

Deep breath:

“WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

That is all.

Posted in hockey pool 2009-2010 | 8 Comments