Book meme!

Canuck-hater and soon-to-be Invading Yankee Imperialist DuWayne has tagged me with a book meme. The official rules are “list fifteen books that had the most profound impact on you – ones you can think of in fifteen minutes or less.”

Well, I’ll do the fifteen minutes rule, but I can’t guarantee I’ll think of fifteen books in that time. I’m not even sure there are fifteen books that have had a truly “profound” impact on me, and I want all killer, no filler in my list! I’ll add hyperlinks and comments after the time is up.

Here goes.

All Creatures Great and Small” by James Herriot. Made me want to be a vet for about six or seven years. I didn’t stick with that plan, but the idea was what first sparked my interest in a career in or around biology.

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” by Douglas Adams. I was “different” as an adolescent – different from my family, and different from my peers at high school. I think this book was the first one I ever read that made me feel like my interests and sense of humour might just be shared by someone else*.

Pride and Prejudice” by Jane Austen. I soooooooooooo thought I was Elizabeth Bennett when I was thirteen! I have “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies” on order; it’s currently being held up as it’s in the same order as something that doesn’t come out in paperback until September. Can’t wait.

Cannery Row” by John Steinbeck. I fell head over heels in love with this book, and must have read it about twenty times by now. I turn to it when I’m stressed or unhappy, and Steinbeck’s wonderful characters never fail to comfort me. This was also my gateway into his other, more serious, works, which helped shape my politics as I grew up.

That was eight minutes’ worth and I’m now drawing blanks…

Oh! “Pecked to Death by Ducks” by Tim Cahill. A collection of adventure travel articles that first inspired me to try ocean kayaking. I will be forever grateful to Tim Cahill for this introduction to one of my favourite activities. I’ve read his other collections too, and they’re all great.

Which reminds me… “Swallows and Amazons” by Arthur Ransome. Made me long for adventure; unfortunately, my one attempt at learning to sail resulted in a lot of unplanned ocean swims.

The Chrysalids” by John Wyndham. One of my first forays into science fiction.

Eva” by Peter Dickinson. Fuelled my passion for primates and the environment.

Well, that’s eight (or twelve, if you count Hitchhiker as a trilogy of five books) – I did better than I thought I would! I’m sure I’ll start thinking of more examples once I’ve posted this.

I tag… anyone who’s ever fallen out of a sailboat.

——————–

*In his wonderful foreword to The Salmon of Doubt, Stephen Fry wrote the following:

“When you […] read Douglas Adams […], you feel you are perhaps the only person in the world who really gets them. Just about everyone else admires them, of course, but no one really connects with them in the way you do. […] It’s like falling in love. When an especially peachy Adams turn of phrase or epithet enters the eye and penetrates the brain you want to tap the shoulder of the nearest stranger and share it. The stranger might laugh and seem to enjoy the writing, but you hug to yourself the thought that they didn’t quite understand its force and quality the way you do – just as your friends (thank heavens) don’t also fall in love with the person you are going on and on about to them”.

Yeah. Been there, done that – although not with complete strangers! I would read snippets out loud to whichever friend or relative was nearest, but they never seemed to properly appreciate the words.

Posted in book review, meme | 28 Comments

Hierarchy in the UK

One of the things I love about Canada is the relative freedom from snobbery and classism. In the UK your accent gives away so much about your class, your education, and your region of origin, and people do judge you based on this information. I know, because I used to do it too.

In my case, inverse snobbery was deeply ingrained into me by classmates at my state (=public, in North American terms) comprehensive school*, and it took a few years to start to erase those impulses. “Posh” was used as an insult, and we mercilessly took the piss out of the kids from the city’s public (=private – yes, posh schools that you have to pay for are called public schools in the UK, don’t ask me why) schools whenever we met them on the streets or on the hockey field. As a frequent piss-taking victim myself, for my good grades and perceived “posh”, non-local (at first) accent, I had to work a bit harder than normal to prove my inverse snobbery credentials to my peers, and consciously changed the way I pronounced certain words in order to try and fit in with everyone else.

I didn’t really encounter classical (i.e. top-down) snobbery and classism until I went to University. Former public school kids who heard my accent and learned I was from a state school in Yorkshire assumed I was “thick” (direct quote), and were “amazed” (another direct quote) to hear that I was one of the top three students on my undergraduate degree course. Others saw my grades before they really knew me, and assumed I was from a public school “because you’re intelligent” (yet another direct quote). My sister, who moved South instead of North, had an even harder time; some of her peers had never heard a real-life Yorkshire accent before, and actually laughed out loud when she spoke. She also blames her accent for her failure to get into Cambridge, despite getting straight As and being on multiple city and county sports teams and two musical ensembles.

Oh, and I’m sure I unfairly disparaged plenty of people with posh accents. Sorry.

But really, despite this divide persisting well into my undergraduate years, I’d barely thought about state vs. public school education since moving on to grad school 11 years ago. I was under the naive impression that the further you get from your school years, the less they matter. Surely, once you have a degree or two and a few years of real-life work experience, no-one cares where you went to school.

But this report on the BBC website yesterday gave me a wake-up call. How depressing that this state of affairs still persists:

Granted, I have no idea how the corresponding Canadian or US figures would look. Maybe they’d be quite similar. But somehow I suspect that the depressing graph above is an indicator of a very British problem. Both top-down and inverse snobbery, along with that pervasive British anti-intellectualism streak, contribute to this sad state of affairs, and to the waste of far too much potential.

Ugh. Now I feel icky.

ETA: this new article is an interesting take on social mobility. Canada is in the top five countries for social mobility, alongside the Scandinavian nations (yay socialism!) The US and UK are at the bottom. There are some very interesting points about how state education is funded, and the relative influences of parents vs. the state. Highly recommended if you’re interested in this issue!

—————
*charitably described as “mixed ability intake”. Two thirds of kids in my year left at age 16, and only about half of those who continued went on to University at 18. Three girls in my form of ~25 kids were pregnant by 14; one of them was divorced with two kids by the age of 19. But, thanks to some wonderful teachers, those of us who did well, did very well. The opportunities were certainly there for people who had the ability and the desire to take them.

Posted in Canada, education, rants, UK | 15 Comments

Tuesday pet peeve: militant NIMBYism

NIMBYism is rampant in Vancouver, and it drives me nuts.

Olympics? No, we don’t want that, it’ll be too chaotic. Rapid transit to the airport? Nope, we don’t want the inconvenience of the construction. Better cycling infrastructure? No, it’ll jam up the traffic.

But what really pisses me off is the kind of NIMBY who actually wants the above initiatives to fail, at great detriment to the city, just so they can prove that they were right. The kind of NIMBY who would cut off their nose to spite their face, rather than admit they were wrong.

Seriously, people are being interviewed on the TV news, and commenting on news websites, who seem genuinely disappointed that the recent bike lane trial on the Burrard Bridge hasn’t brought downtown traffic to a complete standstill.

The most obvious example though is the continuing Olympic NIMBYism.

Now, there are valid arguments against hosting the Games. For example, once the global economy tanked and the city was left on the hook for the Olympic Village construction costs, those of us who started out strongly pro-Games had to admit that the naysayers might have had a point when they kept going on about generations of debt, and eternal doom and gloom in general.

But if you say that you hope the Games get cancelled because of a swine flu epidemic, or that no-one comes because they can’t afford to travel and the whole thing is a disaster, YOU ARE AN IDIOT. Do you really want that to happen? So you can sit there smirking “told you so” for decades to come, as property taxes rise and the city’s other infrastructure suffers?

Really????

Some people are even saying that they want to actively disrupt the Games!!!

The Olympics are coming, like it or not. You didn’t vote for it, you didn’t want it to happen, but it’s gonna. So accept it, get over it, move on. Let’s do whatever we can to make the Games a raging success!

You never know, you might even enjoy having a global party in your backyard, with some of the world’s best athletes as your guests.

A plague of noisy hockey fans upon Vancouver’s militant NIMBYs!

Posted in cycling, plagues, politics, rants, sport, Vancouver | 22 Comments

iPhoto

Disclosing my profession to health care professionals can be both a blessing and a curse.
Some doctors assume that I know more than I really do. Others get defensive when I know more than they do about one teeny tiny little area of biology (there are too estrogen receptor molecules in the GI tract, Dr “Your Contraceptive Pills Can’t Possibly Be Causing These Symptoms”. I know because a reviewer once pointed it out as a possible weakness in my analysis and I had to spend a couple of weeks looking up new references, checking promoter sequences for binding sites, and rewriting my discussion). Some doctors apparently just like to freak me out; I really did not need to discuss current research on cancer stem cells while having a suspicious mole removed from my arm.
But today, it provided me with a couple of cool photos to share with you.
My optometrist is Teh Awesome, and we always have a really good chat about science and medicine while she asks me to compare two seemingly identical sets of lenses. (“Number one, or number two?” “Um, they look the same… number one might be a bit better. No! Wait! Number two”. I am a very frustrating patient). So when she was showing me the retinal scans she’d just taken (everything is AOK, apparently), I asked her for a copy, and they were waiting in my email inbox when I got back to my desk after my appointment.
Here’s my retina, with optical nerve (white doughnut shape on left), macula (red blob on right), and blood vessels:

And here’s the hilarious effect of the eye-dilating drops on my poor innocent little pupils (self portrait with iPhone camera):

Yeah. I’m currently hiding at my desk, avoiding all contact with colleagues until I stop looking quite so stoned.

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

Current view

I missed the 6:40 ferry by 5 minutes… but bumped into a friend on a
patio, had a beer, and am on the 8:40 ferry right now with 2 other
friends. The sunset view was worth the wait!

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

I think we might have a mouse problem

I came into the kitchen today to see a rather suspicious scene.


This is what I saw when I got down on the floor and looked under the dresser:



So that’s where all those toys went!

I fished out everything I could with a coathanger…


…but there are still lots of goodies under there!

Posted in furry friends, photos, silliness | 5 Comments

Astronomum

It’s 1995 in North Yorkshire, and an 18 year-old mega-geek is applying to university. Her parents – languages teachers both – are supplying a steady stream of advice, food, and general support. Oh, and lots of their teacher friends to interrogate their elder daughter about her higher education plans, and to repeat the same conversation ad nauseum in a seemingly never-ending cycle of predictability.
Friend of Parents: “So what do you want to study?”
Mega-geek: “Genetics.”
FOP: “Really??!! With your parents I thought you’d be studying French, or German, or Spanish.”
MG: “No, I’m doing biology, chemistry and maths A levels, and I want to do genetics at uni.”
FOP: “Ha ha ha ha ha! That’s so funny! Because your parents are linguists! Can you explain the genetics of that?!
MG: “Heh. Good one.”
Repeat approximately once a month until graduation four years later. “I’m doing a PhD in molecular cell biology” did not elicit the same levels of hilarity, for some reason.
——————
I am the first and only scientist in my family. My younger sister went on to study French and Italian, and when we were all together, the three of them would sometimes converse in French (their one common foreign language) without even realising they were doing it. My level of French extends to ordering food and finding hotels, so this caused the occasional problem for me.
Having said that, it was my parents (mostly my Mum) who first exposed me to biology, in the form of battered but beloved copies of James Herriot’s books, museum visits, and a regular diet of David Attenborough documentaries. Those influences proved to be the start of a slippery slope for me, but no-one else chose to delve much further into the wonders of science. (Unless they were accidentally talking about science in French and wondering why I wasn’t joining in).
However, an interesting thing happened once my sister and I moved out for good and my Mum had more time to follow her own interests. Her latent interest in space evolved from a working mother’s habit of having Star Trek on in the background while calmly and efficiently multitasking away, to a more serious study of space exploration and astronomy. After she went part-time at work, she started taking evening classes, reading astronomy books, and even bought a telescope. For the first time, we were able to discuss a popular science book that we’d both read (E=mc 2 – highly recommended. I bought it for her as I knew she’d love the last section, on the formation of stars and planets).
So, for my Mum’s 60th birthday yesterday, I bought her a super-cool mega-geek gizmo called the Sky Scout:

Point the Sky Scout personal planetarium at a heavenly body and it will identify any of 7,500 stars in all 88 constellations using its in-built celestial database and GPS technology.
Sky Scout will recommend the twenty best celestial objects to spot on any given day, time and location, and help you locate thousands of stars, with comprehensive text and audio descriptions for the most popular objects.
(Text and image from the Science Museum’s website)
I think it’s important to encourage and nourish a parent’s interests and natural curiosity.
She loved it. She’s going to bring it over when they visit next summer, so we can stargaze together.
I’m 32 years old, and I finally have another scientist in my family.

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments

Could I possibly trouble you…

Erm, here’s a link for my readers. Especially those based in BC.

if you wouldn’t mind…

could you possibly…

only if you want to…

if it’s not too much trouble…

Gaah, being British sucks sometimes! And Canadians are too polite to help me get over it.

OK, I’m gonna try the American way.

“Please nominate my blog”.

“Thank you”.

(Sorry to bother you)

Posted in meta, video | 11 Comments

Tuesday pet peeve

I don’t know why everyone’s so negative about Mondays. I like Mondays. I come in all fresh and well rested, chat to various colleagues about their weekends, and settle into work full of enthusiasm and motivation. I spend my lunch break stocking up on milk, fruit, and other supplies to get me through the rest of the week, and have a very productive day.

(Mostly).

Wednesdays are hump days, which is nice. On Thursdays the weekend is in sight, with a pay cheque every second week, and then Fridays are usually the most relaxed day of the week, with coffee dates and longer lunches.

It’s the Tuesdays that get me.

Tuesdays are busy but generally unproductive days, with endless meetings and emails and additions to my to-do list. I’m no longer quite so fresh and enthusiastic, tend to get bogged down in admin and crisis-of-the-week issues, and the weekend is still days away.

So it’s a good day to start what may or may not become a recurring series of Tuesday posts.

Today’s Pet Peeve:

“Regular” does not mean “Frequent”.

How often do you see a questionnaire with options labelled “Never, Occasionally, Regularly, Always”?

“Regular” means that an event occurs at, well, regular, predictable intervals. That can mean once an hour, once a day, once a year, once a century, or once a millenium. It does not tell you anything at all about the frequency of the event.

A plague of constipation upon people who misuse the word “regular”.

Posted in career, English language, plagues, rants | 14 Comments

A Mad Tea Beer Party

I got to meet another of my favourite bloggers yesterday! (That’s three blog meet-ups now, and they’ve all been great. I highly recommend it).

This time it was Mad Hatter‘s turn. She’s in town for a few days, and had a long enough window in her busy schedule that I got to take her kayaking! It was a very windy day for this time of year, so my promised “leisurely paddle no more than 20 metres from the beach” turned into a solid two hour workout, during which we had to fight to get the boat to turn back towards shore from the middle of the harbour. But despite being a novice kayaker, Mad Hatter paddled like a pro and didn’t let the wind or waves phase her. She even claimed to enjoy herself! No eagles out yesterday unfortunately, but we did spot a seal, some cormorants, a tern, and assorted gulls.

Meeting a blogger is a bit of a weird experience, with elements of both a blind date and a catch-up with an old friend. You really can get a decent impression of what someone’s like from their blog, and indeed Mad Hatter was much as I expected her to be – smart, funny, and with lots of common ground to talk about! Our animated conversation about blogging, science, pets, and life in general continued after the kayaking, on Vancouver’s best patio…


…and the four hours we spent together simply flew by.

Thanks mate! I hope you enjoy the rest of your stay!

Unanswered questions:

  • How did Massimo guess who I was meeting on his first try?
  • What would his other two guesses have been?
Posted in blog buddies, kayaking, photos | 13 Comments