Explaining my scarlet letter


This post has been brewing and fermenting in my mind ever since I added the scarlet A to my blog a few months ago. The A is for Atheist, and you can read about the purpose of the corresponding “Out Campaign” here.

I was finally spurred into action by a recent thread on Pharyngula, in which commenters gave their “deconversion” stories. Plus I wanted to tell you my own story before reading and being influenced by “The God Delusion“, which is lurking near the top of my reading list. So here is the tale of Why CAE is an Atheist. My apologies for the length, but it was a long process…

Unlike many of the people on the Pharyngula thread, I do not come from a particularly religious family. My Mum is Church of England and my Dad is a lapsed Catholic. My Mum is definitely the more religious of the two. She teaches French at a church-sponsored state school and attends services with her students, but apart from that she doesn’t go to church except for the obligatory hatches, matches and dispatches. My Dad effectively gave up on organised religion after his family priest refused to acknowledge my Mum’s existence – they had visited him together to try to persuade him to change his mind and read the banns.

So what did this mean for my sister and me? We were both baptised Church of England, and I vaguely remember going to some kind of Sunday school once or twice, but it wasn’t a major feature of our home lives. I went to a Christmas Eve church service with my Mum one year, because we wanted to hear the carols. I once had a discussion with my Dad about how he wants to figure out what he believes in before he dies, but I was quite young at the time and hadn’t really formulated my own opinions yet. (We’re not really a deep discussion kind of a family – our weekly phone calls are 50% personal news updates, 40% sport and 10% dreadful jokes). I did find out last year that my Catholic Godmother tried to buy me a catechism and rosary when I was a kid, but was deterred by my parents. As it stands, she’s taken me to more pubs than churches.

Most of my religious instruction therefore took place at school. I went to a perfectly normal state primary school, but since there’s no formal separation of church and state in the UK our teachers were apparently free to discuss religion in any way they saw fit. (I have no idea what the actual law was at the time, but I do know that no kids or parents ever complained or thought that our teachers were doing anything wrong or strange in any way. It should be noted that our school was almost 100% white at the time, although my best friend (then and now) is Sikh – more on that later).

Our exposure to religion mostly took the form of teachers telling us the nativity, crucifixion and resurrection stories, with none of the “some people believe” phrases that you’d need to include nowadays. So, for all intents and purposes, the same people who told us that there are two high tides and two low tides each day, and that the Earth goes around the sun, also told us that our saviour was born in a stable in Bethlehem and died for our sins before coming back to life and ascending to heaven. No context, no caveats, no nothing, and we had no reason not to believe every word they said.

I was a quiet, well behaved and academic kind of girl, and I wanted to please my teachers. When I was about 8 or 9 my favourite teacher asked everyone in the class to raise their hands if they went to church. When only a couple of kids did so she reacted in shock and horror and said that she couldn’t believe such a thing was possible. I went home that night and asked my parents if we could please start going to church? They were quite taken aback and quizzed me for my reasons, never guessing that it was only so I could report back to Mrs Lawson and receive her praise.

They really, really like to remind me now that I was the one who wanted to go to church when I was a kid. And that they didn’t take me. We usually went on hikes on Sundays instead.

Things changed when I went to secondary school – again, a perfectly normal state comprehensive. I think our non-white contingent went up, from 2 students to 4 or something like that, and our new teachers didn’t tell bible stories or make us sing hymns. Instead we started to learn about history, biology, and, more importantly, other religions. This was my first “hang on a minute” moment. You’re saying that the Hindus, and Moslems, and Buddhists, and Jews, all believe different things, all with the same conviction with which my former teachers believed those bible stories? And what about the Greek, Roman and Norse gods? People back then knew that those stories were true, too.

From “well, they can’t all be right” it’s not too much of a stretch to get to “maybe they’re all wrong”, but in fact it took me a good few years.

I spent much of my time in high school with my two best friends, one Sikh and one Methodist. They both came from religious families and attended church or temple regularly, and we had some interesting discussions as I started to question what I’d been taught at primary school. My Sikh friend and her family maintained that Jesus, Mohammad, Buddha, the Hindu gods and Sikh gurus were all different manifestations of one unifying truth. They took my sister and me to their temple in Leeds one weekend, which was a very interesting experience for us. Coming from such a white area, it was especially strange to enter the temple and be the only white people in a room of several hundred people. It certainly gave me some perspective on what my friend and her sister went through every day. And the food was excellent.

On the other hand, my Methodist friend was shocked at my statement that “if there is a God, and to get into Heaven you have to worship him and obey him, rather than just do good things, then I’m not sure I want to go”. I should say that this friend is one of the few very religious Christians I’ve ever known who truly practiced what she preached. If she saw a homeless person on the street she would drop whatever she was doing to buy them some food and have a conversation with them. Imagine a large group of semi-drunk 18 year olds on a Christmas Eve pub crawl standing around in the cold and wondering what she would do if we told her to bloody well hurry up so we could go to the White Swan… Interestingly, she’s now an agnostic (it wasn’t my fault) and still just as lovely.

My ideas continued to mature as I got older. I read “I Claudius”, which described the Roman reaction to the burgeoning Christian faith and disparaged Christianity as a religion for slaves. I started to see how the concept of an eternal reward in the afterlife – if you obey certain laws and generally behave yourself in the present – could be used to control a population, and how invoking an all-seeing, all-powerful deity was the best way to ensure compliance. I heard someone make an off-hand remark that avoiding pork and seafood in hot climates was a really good idea and that, again, invoking a deity was the best way to make an uneducated population understand the importance of food hygiene. And how better to explain where we came from than to say we’d been created by the same all powerful deity? I realised that there must be a deep-seated human need to know where we came from, and that every culture in history has come up with a different explanation to satisfy its people.

We first learned about evolution at around the same time, and it just made so much sense. It was so logical, so elegant – how could it possibly be any other way? Now, I haven’t read “The Blind Watchmaker“, but I do know one of its most famous quotes:

“Although atheism might have been logically tenable before Charles Darwin, Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.”

Dawkins’ quote sums up my own feelings perfectly. Evolution, along with abiogenesis theories such as the RNA world hypothesis, provides us with an explanation of where we came from that is supported by actual evidence and doesn’t need to invoke a magical deity. Some people might not like the fact that we’re related to monkeys, but that doesn’t make it any less true, and the supporting evidence is right there for anyone to see – if they’re willing to look. I began to see the myths and stories of all extinct and extant religions as nothing more* than attempts to explain (and control) from an era that didn’t have access to any better explanations.

I called myself an agnostic for a few years, and really, agnosticism is the only truly defensible position. I can’t know for sure that there are no gods, just as no-one else can know for sure that there are. But for the last few years I’ve called myself an atheist. In the absence of all evidence to the contrary, I’m happy to say that there are no gods.

Of course, if I’m struck by lightning as I publish this post, or see any other evidence, I’ll be more than happy to change my mind.

I hope I didn’t offend anyone – that wasn’t my intention, and I’m sure boredom and indifference are the more likely reactions anyway. I’m heading off on a ski trip today, back next week, so if you leave a comment and I don’t reply right away, it’s not because I’m not willing to debate and to examine my logic. It might be because I got struck by lightning though. That Thor bloke has a temper on him.

*or less. In that context, I find the stories absolutely fascinating.
Posted in atheism, education, evolution, personal | 17 Comments

Really strange job ad

I came across this job advertisement in a February edition of the New Scientist:

Not a Lab Rat Job / Special Projects Manager
Binnacle
MA – Massachusetts

Escape the NIH nightmare to join an eccentric CEO/entrepreneur of a Harvard Square-based, small money manager. As his special projects manager with diverse lab management/research experience and excellent technical writing skills, you could become part of an innovative and eccentric team.”

The ad’s no longer on the website so that’s all the information I have.

I’m sure this job would be absolutely perfect for someone, but personally I’d stay away from a job description that uses the word “eccentric” twice in as many sentences.

Posted in career, science, silliness | 4 Comments

Citation conspiracy?

I may have uncovered another conspiracy. This time it’s to publish papers related to my postdoctoral research without citing me.
I like being cited, and when a few likely looking candidates came up in this week’s Pubcrawler alert I thought I was on to something.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

Continued silliness, and a limerick competition!

I’m more often silly than not,

And some of the feedback I got,
Said to keep being ditzy –
It seems that it fits me –
So VWXYNot?

Don’t worry, there will continue to be an interspersing of silliness amongst my more sensible posts.

And I want to spread the silliness! Write me a limerick that ends in VWXYNot?, or in the name of your own blog or user name, and I’ll send the writer of my favourite entry some of the Nature Network goodies they sent me last week (Sharpie pens, buttons and stickers). And maybe something else if I’m feeling generous. If you don’t want to give up your mailing address then I’m sure we can figure something out.

Posted in competition, English language, limericks, silliness | 7 Comments

Signs of stress

Oof! I’m glad that’s over. My thoughts on the great Canadian research funding conspiracy are on my other blog.

Here are some signs my brain was over-worked this week:

I wrote dodgy limericks

– I made up new words while talking to my supervisor. (If he’d told me to be more precise and I replied “right, got it, more precision” it would have been OK, but I was told to be more concise and apparently concision isn’t a word. He knew what I meant though. The secret when making up new words is to say them with confidence).

– I talked complete crap in the mornings. (My hubby came to wake me up on Monday morning and I apparently asked him if he was real or symbolic. He assured me that he was real and asked me if I was asleep or awake, and I told him I didn’t know).

– I left semi-coherent blog comments all over the place. Sorry ’bout that, but I needed those 5 minute breaks from the madness.

– I ate way too much junk food.

So what did I learn from my first big multiple grant deadline?

Mostly that I am a great big control freak. I frequently found myself waiting for a PI to return edits or new sections of text that I needed before I could proceed, and I just knew they’d arrive at exactly the same time as the edits from another PI working on a different grant. It was very much boom and bust, and my inability to control my own schedule and work flow was very frustrating.

Luckily, my supervisor realised what was going on and suggested that we meet soon to discuss the experience. I was planning to ask for this meeting anyway – I was happy to be reactive for this first round of applications, but next time around I want to proactively address some of the issues that came up. Hopefully we can devise a way to get people to commit to staggered internal deadlines so I don’t receive everything at the same time (i.e. the last possible minute). I’m also going to suggest that we ask people to state up-front exactly which parts of the application I’ll be responsible for – there were a couple of miscommunications and changes to original plans that caused me to stay at work fiddling around with budgets long after everyone else had left, two nights in a row. My supervisor is also concerned that not all the things I was asked to do were appropriate; for example, I ended up writing the bulk of two different grant proposals (nearly all of it in one case), which isn’t really what I’m supposed to be doing, although it was actually my favourite part of the process!

As for my least favourite part: I really really hope we hire more secretarial support soon, because formatting all the CVs for different competitions’ requirements was one huge frustrating time sink, and really doesn’t require any kind of scientific background. I suspect that the need for different formats for different competitions may be part of the aforementioned conspiracy.

Anyway. It’s over now. And my (partial) break from blogging also made me take a step back and reconsider a few things.

My posts seem to have been getting shorter, more frequent, and sillier. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, and the short’n’sillies will keep on popping up. (In fact I was quite taken with the interactive limerick concept, thanks to Mermaid, and it might reappear at some point!). But while I was officially offline, I was tinkering with a couple of posts in Word, at home in the mornings and (surreptitiously) at work while I was waiting for the next work surge. I’ve got a couple of draft posts waiting, and I think they read better for having been written more slowly and edited multiple times. So that’s what I’m going to try to do from now on – post less often, and put more time and thought into each post.

I’m also going to demote Friday’s Primate Party to an occasional feature. It had become a wee bit of a chore, and I’ve quite enjoyed my recent freedom from searching for suitable stories to cover. Only the really good primate stories will make it in now.

It’s all about quality, not quantity!

Right, I’m off to catch up with some neglected emails and blog posts. Does anyone want to play Scrabulous? If you’re on Facebook I’m sure you can figure out how to find me!

Posted in career, English language, grant wrangling, meta, personal, silliness | 8 Comments

The Great Canadian Research Funding Conspiracy Theory

Well, that was one crazy week. I was involved in a grand total of 8 grants, 5 of which had a February 29th deadline (specialised Provincial programme) with the remaining 3 due on March 3rd (CIHR operating grants – the Big One in Canadian science, more or less equivalent to an NIH R01). My role ranged from that of co-applicant, writing most of the proposal, to supplier of specific blocks of text, to proof-reader and CV formatter. And man am I glad this week is over!
Now why would these big deadlines cluster together in this way? My exhausted and over-caffeinated brain has come up with the following explanation:

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Great Canadian Research Funding Conspiracy Theory

Now this is a great idea

The UK’s National Trust is giving all employees the day off tomorrow, and has asked them to spend the day “for the environment”.

I like this idea. Why should we work an extra day every four years for no extra pay?

Who on Earth thought it was a good idea to set a grant deadline on February 29th?

1 grant is submitted. 7 to go…
_____

ETA: There’s a really nice expanation of the leap year concept at the Bad Astronomy Blog. The summary is:

What to do to figure out if it’s a leap year or not:

We add a leap day every 4 years, except for every 100 years, except for every 400 years. In other words…

If the year is divisible by 4, then it’s a leap year, UNLESS
it’s also divisible by 100, then it’s not a leap year, UNLESS FURTHER
the year is divisible by 400, then it is a leap year.

So 1996 was a leap year […]. 1997, 1998, and 1999 were not. 2000 was a leap year, because even though it is divisible by 100 it’s also divisible by 400.

1700, 1800, and 1900 were not leap years, but 2000 was. 2100 won’t be, nor 2200, nor 2300. But 2400 will be.

Posted in silliness | 5 Comments

This is what too much caffeine and adrenaline does to me

When working on multiple grants,
I fly by the seat of my pants.
When it comes to the budget,
Please let me just fudge it,
Or you’ll suffer from one of my rants.

Apparently I look like someone who knows what tissue microarrays cost.

And yeah, I know I said I wouldn’t post this week, but I need some kind of outlet for my twitchy energy while I wait for responses from various PIs…

Posted in grant wrangling, limericks, rants, science | 6 Comments

Real life intrudes


Me fail English? That’s unpossible!

I only have a finite daily ability to write coherent English, and at the moment I need every last word of the good stuff at work. So I’m going to take a week or so off until all my grant deadlines are past.

See you in March!

Posted in meta, personal | 7 Comments

Diamonds are a writer’s best friend

My job as a research development facilitator means that I get to help colleagues write their grants. Lots of them. For very different projects. For example, I’m currently working on 6 different applications to the same competition, including basic, translational and clinical research proposals.
The various PIs and clinicians who I work with often ask me to write all, or part of, the grant’s introduction section. Due to the wide range of projects I cover, this is often on a subject that I’m not all that familiar with. Luckily this is something that I enjoy and am good at, and the more I do it, the more I see a pattern in my literature searches.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Diamonds are a writer’s best friend