VWXYNot? Comment(s) of the week:
Nina and Grant for the following exchange: Nina: "Life should be a conference, everyone wearing nametags all the time, with their first name, last name, nickname, country of origin and country of residence. Birthdate optional."
Grant: Nina, I’m sure tech types will suggest we’ll all be bumping cell phones to exchange names in a few years. (Eurgh.)
One more: you know that thing where the person can’t quite read your name tag and leans in close over your chest to read it…
Nina: "ok, how about tattooing your name onto your forehead?"
Grant: "How about a sub-dermal name implant invisible when not active that glows when triggered by trained neural signals beaming your name to the people opposite you?
Failing that we could all wear electrode scalp caps that carry a flip up sign… (Taking as my cue the brain-computer interfaces emotiv and others are marketing.)"
[NB as a chronic tartler, I approve of all the above methods]
Alyssa for "It’s cloudy again
We see it’s cold and dreary
But – we have windows!!!"
Ricardipus for "Bugger me, the grant’s
Finally done. Thank goodness.
Now back to fun stuff."
Bean-mom for "I just clicked on the article on circular RNAs–I’d seen the headline earlier but hadn’t yet read it–and just as I expected, I’m all WTF?! MicroRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, now we’ve got circular RNAs. . . I feel like someone should just write a review titled, “RNA: WTF?”"
Nina again for "edit: my advisor has improved his standing desk further by standing on a wooden board that balances on a small (but sturdy) plastic tube, to make him wobble while standing, so to keep working those balancing muscles, or something like that. The tube comes from one of my experiments. I will miss that “wtf I’ll create my own standing desk – pilates work-out” attitude, I must admit."
Bob O'H for "Reminds me of my youth playing boardgames. There was one called Civilisation, which a friend described as “almost as long as the real thing”."
Chall "it surely looks like the Leafs MIGHT go to play offs for the first time in 7 years…. if I didn’t jinx it by saying it here of course. That said, I find myself wondering how bad it will be to end 5th place if Boston stays 4th. It sort of feels better to play the 3rd (Capitals right now) than Bruins but right now I’ll settle for PLAYOFFS and miracle :)"
[the Leafs making the playoffs is a miracle indeed]
KJHaxton for "Good question! I’d put:
– occasional baker of cakes for meetings
– fair to moderate tolerance for bullshit
– low tolerance for unfairness and willing to get very cross about it (folds arms and glowers at the screen)
– best selection of tea bags in desk drawer (8 kinds at last count)
– prone to wearing scarves and shirts that don’t match
Ah well, I’m not sure I’d find a new job on the basis of those :)"
Ricardipus again for "Pros:
- rarely swears in public
- has few friends, so unlikely to have loud, belly-laughing conversations on phone or in person
- capable of speaking at length about (a) race cars, (b) cameras, or (c) bad science
Cons:
- occasionally swears in public
- has few friends, so likely to have poor social interactions with co-workers
- capable of speaking at length about (a) race cars, (b) cameras, or (c) bad science
I’d also probably include “easily suckered into serving on irrelevant committees” into each category, too."
Bean-mom again for "–Friendly.
–Doesn’t bake, but if you have a potluck I’ll bring killer spring rolls (both crispy fried pork ones, and the vegetarian fresh rice-paper ones).
–Doesn’t bake, but husband bakes. Occasionally, you may be a recipient of his talent.
–Will cheerfully listen to other people’s dramas, but won’t cause any of my own. Not at work, anyway."
and Nina yet again for "As I may have mentioned before, I’m pretty sure my cv point “Love baking (chocolate) cakes” earned me my PhD position, and it definitely often raised questions in interviews (“so, how often do you bake cake? What kind of chocolate do you use?”)"
Post(s) of the Week: Beth Snow for "Modern conveniences" (how on earth did we survive, let alone study and write theses, before Skype and cloud computing?!)
Steve Caplan for "Science education: the generalist vs the specialist" (are 3 year or 4 year degrees better for students?)
Bean-mom for "Leaving scientific research... again" (science SUCKS sometimes)
Eva Amsen, writing at the Occam's Typewriter Irregulars for "The two ideas to fix the gender balance that do not make me cringe" (the panel pledge and the Finkbeiner test)
Bob O'Hara for "Making reviewing boring stuff less boring" (would a stripped-down manuscript format work better for the, um, less exciting papers out there?)
Alyssa for "Just the pants, thanks" (absolutely hilarious take on the modern clothes shopping experience)
Eva Amsen again for "My self-updating address book" (how LinkedIn can be useful)
CromerCrox for "Plagues" (how's God been cursing you lately?)
Prof-like Substance for "If you don't talk to your kids about it someone else will" (anticipating school-yard talk about religion and other big issues)
and CromerCrox again for "Conferences" (the problem of sexism at conferences)
Archives:
October 2008 - March 2009; April 2009 - September 2009; October 2009 - March 2010; April 2010 - September 2010; October 2010 - February 2011; March 2011 - September 2011; October 2011 - March 2012; April 2012 - September 2012; October 2012 - March 2013; April 2013 - September 2013
Sounds like the sort of thing that you could up as a ‘product suggestion’ to the likes of the Zotero or Mandeley developers.
A related category of ‘delayed’ information is Supplementary Material, which often isn’t available in the early release versions of papers.
could *put* up, even. (Sigh.)
@Cath: I think it does already exist – it’s called an ‘Online Early Alert’, or ‘eTOC’ (for the version that even includes volume and page information).
I get a bit annoyed at the idea of putting up a preprint without any of the relevant bibliographic data though (and the sort of formatting that positively encourages paper printing), to the extent that I don’t get OEA’s, and just wait for the eTOC’s. But Ecology might be a slower moving field than yours (quick, catch that pasture), so I can afford to wait for the ‘official’ version.
@Grant: Yes! It’s exactly what Zotendely-oh (me say day-oh) need – an automatic updater that scans the doi’s in your library and corrects the relevant info!
yes, I want this as a Zotero-plug-in-ish thingie.
As for other apps, ideally I’d like one that you can use without having a smartphone to operate other people’s phones to turn them off when you start an actual real-life conversation with them.
I’ve never used Zotero or Mandeley – are they good for this kind of thing?
Mike, I can’t see that as an option in any of the tabs I have open. I get my new article alerts via RSS, rather than as an eTOC email, and for many journals the version that shows up in the RSS feed is the provisional PDF. Do I have to sign up for a third-party service, or do you mean that you can get such an alert from the journal website itself?
Nina, I believe that app exists and is called “glass of water”
Sounds like you basically get the Online Early Alert, which directs you to the provisional pdf. If you can afford to wait for the “official” version, just sign up for the eTOC via the journal/publisher website.
e.g., Wiley allow you to create an account, then sign up for OEAs and/or eTOCs to be sent to your email account for their entire range of journals. I’ve just reset my email address with them, and inadvertedly turned on the OEAs, which I’m a bit annoyed about. But the eTOCs work well, and link to the final version of the paper.
Mike,
I might look into the publisher’s eTOC (etc) services myself – but how do these compare with what PubMed offers? I like that their services works off keywords, drawing articles from the whole of PubMed (and, from memory, that you can set the frequency of updates).
The eTOCs come out as often as the journal itself does. I’m afraid I don’t use PubMed, so I can’t compare. If you’re happy with getting online early versions of papers, I think you can select the frequency of updates for those though.
Hmmm. I switched from email eTOCs to RSS because the emails were clogging up my inbox. I think I’d rather refresh a few tabs multiple times until the final PDF comes out than have that again!
or “their glass of beer/wine”
Well if an app or API could be produced that does that it could do much more: you could scan your library every now and then to get the latest version of the papers in your library, but also corrigenda, erratas and, holy of holies, retractions. Indeed I would expect the Mendelero people to be working on it already.
Now you’re talking!
I’m only game for the 99 cents if my grant pays for it…
Pingback: Bragging Rights Central archive, Oct 2012 – Mar 2013 | VWXYNot?