Now that’s an odd name for a dog.

Posted on November 26, 2010 by Cath@VWXYNot?

Weird that they didn’t give the photographer’s name, eh?

(Awesome photo, though, that is in danger of making this Yorkshire lass feel homesick. Check out the series – there are some stunning shots included in the slide show).

About Cath@VWXYNot?

"one of the sillier science bloggers [...] I thought I should give a warning to the more staid members of the community." - Bob O'Hara, December 2010
This entry was posted in nature, photos, silliness, the media, UK. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Now that’s an odd name for a dog.

  1. Nina says:
    November 27, 2010 at 6:30 am

    you know where else they have sheep though

  2. Lisbeth says:
    November 27, 2010 at 7:45 am

    Very noble to give your dog both a first and a surname 🙂

  3. Lisbeth says:
    November 27, 2010 at 7:46 am

    And now I've checked the other photos: WAUW!

  4. Cath@VWXYNot? says:
    November 28, 2010 at 7:41 pm

    Nina: Australia? :)Lisbeth, yes, it must add a certain air of formality to the proceedings.

Comments are closed.