Hockey Pool, Week 1

Happy Thanksgiving to my fellow Canadians! I’m thankful for hockey, hockey pools, and awesome blog buddies, among other things.

Congratulations Thomas Joseph on winning the first week of the pool!

Just remember that it’s a marathon, not a sprint…

Who wants to do the update next week? I’ll send you the spreadsheet…

Posted in hockey pool | 8 Comments

Staycation Proclamation!

WHEREAS Cath@VWXYNot?, author of an independent weblog at http://vwxynot.blogspot.com (“The Blogger”), has somehow managed to use less 2010 vacation time than she thought, and has more unused days remaining than she is allowed to roll over into 2011; and

WHEREAS The Blogger has only ever had three (3) weekdays off work (not including sick days) that were spent at home, rather than on either domestic or international trips, during her almost nine (9) years of residence in the city of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (“Vancouver”); and

WHEREAS on weekends, the most attractive parts of Vancouver (see Exhibits, attached) are teeming with People Who Do Not Know How To Walk/Jog/Cycle/Rollerblade In Crowds Without Impeding The Progress of Others (“Fuckwits”); and

WHEREAS The Blogger lacks the patience to deal with said Fuckwits in large numbers; and

WHEREAS on weekends, The Blogger therefore tends to avoid visiting the most attractive parts of Vancouver; and

WHEREAS The Blogger has ideas for several interesting writing projects, but can not summon up the requisite mental energy while working full time in a writing-based job, at least not when the weekends are warm and sunny; and

WHEREAS the 2010 Vancouver-Whistler Olympic Winter Games (“The Party Of The Century”) brought the entire Vancouver movie industry to a standstill for three months in the winter and spring of this year (a situation hereby declared “Totally Worth It”); and

WHEREAS The Blogger and her Husband (“Mr E Man”) therefore have no (0) money at this time and can not afford a) to fly anywhere exotic, or b) let Mr E Man take any more time off work this year:

NOW, THEREFORE, it has been agreed that The Blogger shall be released from her place of employment for a period of one (1) week in mid-November 2010, during which time she shall (mostly) stay within the limits of the Vancouver city boundaries (“Staycation”). The activities that shall fall under this Staycation Agreement may include, but not be limited to, the following:

  • Visiting the Vancouver attractions listed in the attached Exhibits while they are (relatively) free of Fuckwits; 
  • Hanging out in coffee bars in the most fun parts of town (which may include, but not be limited to, Kitsilano, Main Street, Commercial Drive, and Granville Island) with a MacBook and an Americano, pretending to be A Writer;
  • Catching up on sleep;
  • Cooking some delicious dinners;
  • Getting to be the one still sitting on the sofa looking cozy with a cup of tea, a fleece blanky, and a kitty cat or two when Mr E Man has to go out into the dark and the rain to go to work (the converse of the situation during The Party Of The Century, and also last week, this week, and possibly for the next two or three weeks while Mr E Man is Between Movies);
  • Spending time with friends and/or sisters-in-law who do not work standard weekday 9am – 5pm (PST) hours, possibly including a visit to a spa for a massage, to be followed by a cocktail hour. Or two.

So there.

Right, just this work trip to get through (this post is scheduled to publish while The Blogger is at Vancouver International Airport at Stupid O’Clock (PST) on a Monday morning, looking bleary eyed and attempting to make intelligent conversation with her boss and assorted other colleagues), then six more weeks of grants, manuscripts, progress reports, ethics applications, and (how did you guess?) MTAs and collaborative research agreements, and then The Blogger is FREE! FREE! FREE!

(for a week).

NOW, THEREFORE, YAY!

________________________________
Exhibit A: Stanley Park Seawall. The Blogger has given up all attempts to cycle or rollerblade around this attractive pathway on weekends due to being almost knocked into the water on multiple occasions by Fuckwits stopping dead in front of her for no apparent reason. On one such occasion she was forced to rollerblade rather painfully into a metal fence in order to avoid this fate, and obtained some rather spectacular bruises as a result. The Blogger used to take a detour on her ride home from work to enjoy this route on certain weekday evenings in summer, but since subsequently moving away from her original neighbourhood of Kitsilano this option is no longer practicable. (This Staycation Activity is weather-dependent).

Exhibit B: Granville Island Public Market. Known for its delicious fresh local produce, delicious fresh hot food and beverages, and large roving packs of Fuckwits on weekends.

Exhibit C: Vancouver Art Gallery. The Blogger has never visited for reasons that she can not satisfactorily explain. (She did try during The Party Of The Century, when entry was free, but it was far too busy and full of elite international Fuckwits).

Exhibit D: Dr. Sun Yat-Sen Classical Chinese Garden, which again The Blogger has never visited, nor made any attempt to visit, for reasons that remain obscure.

Posted in 2010 Olympics, cycling, food glorious food, freelancing, personal, silliness, Vancouver, whining | 13 Comments

Bragging Rights Central V

New archive post!

Remember that there’s an annual vote and prize for the best comment of the year – coming in mid-December to a very silly blog near you!

Dates represent date of archiving – it’s just easier that way.

VWXYNot? Comment(s) of the week:

Oct 1 2010: Ricardipus for “What I like best about the pelicans I’ve seen (Brown Pelicans, in Florida) is how they wheel and glide overhead, obviously delighting in the wind, and then

WHUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! they fold their wings and absolutely PLUMMET into the ocean after a fish.

Graceful aerobats and psychotic daredevil bombardiers all at once. Love ’em.”

Nina for “google translator solely exists for the purpose of a good laugh every now and then. A friend of mine translated a persian abstract into french, but since no one spoke enough french to see hilarious mistakes, it was a wasted effort. So he put the translation into his thesis.”

and Microbiologist XX for “For a second I thought maybe you found this guys Dungeons and Dragons CV.”

Oct 8 2010: sooo many this week! It’s the hockey pool trash talk that does it.

Thomas Joseph for “my agency recognizes papers by letting you keep your job!”

Professor in Training for “How does my dept recognize my achievements? They don’t. Most of my colleagues avoid me because the more I do, the worse they look.”

Pika for “we have a “mandatory”* departamental social event about once a month – just for fun. […]

*Mandatory, according to my boss: “fun is not optional””

Bob for “And of course the imaginary answers are

1: martini,
2: University (it’s in Oz)
3: computer (the computer fish is a more evolved electric eel)
4: IO (yes, that moon does have life on it)
5: DOD,
6: Stupidity (political science),
7: trousers,
8: money (as in “a fuel and his money are easily divided”),
9: jazz,
10 is rover”

Alyssa for “Damn – I was kind of hoping you’d forget about the NHL pool this year so I wouldn’t feel obligated to kick ass again šŸ˜‰

Seriously though, I’ll have to think about it because of the whole baby-coming-in-November-thing, but will let you know!”

then ScientistMother for “Alyssa – what can’t watch hockey AND give birth, talk about lack of multitasking :))) ”

then Chall for “if Alyssa can be more “like all the rest of us” we’ll have a chance this year (slaughter might be too big a word for what happened last year – or not šŸ˜‰ ) ”

Oct 15 2010: soooo many good ones again! You guys are outdoing yourselves lately!

Cromercrox for “I have a theory about fuckwits, though. I don’t think they are as stupid as they seem. It’s all a front. I think they are all members of a secret worldwide conspiracy called S. T. O. P., the Society for Tiresome and Obstructive Pedestrians, whose members might include (but are not limited to)

1. Little old ladies who, while they seem small, walk in such a way as to monopolize the whole sidewalk;

2. Italian teenagers who are ostensibly in UK studying in English, who hang around in shop doorways;

3. Ladies with prams who suddenly stop and gossip with each other.

And so on and so forth in like fashion. I hypothesize that S. T. O. P. is obscurely allied with S. C. U. M., the Society for Curmudgeonly and Uncooperative Motorists, whose members include men driving white vans, people towing caravans, boy racers and so on.”

(very meta, this one) Ricardipus for “I believe I deserve a special award for Most Reasonable Usage of the Term “WHUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” in a Blog Comment About Seabirds During September of 2010.

Also, that comment was possibly the most useful thing I wrote all month.”

following on from last week’s hockey pool-related trash talk between Alyssa, ScientistMother, Chall and me, here’s what happened when Alyssa and Pika won the quiz last week:

ScientistMother for “No fair, some of us actually have to do IMPORTANT things like drive to work, dress, drink coffee, oh and feed small child before we can get onto our blogs. Those damn EST folks have a head start.”

then Alyssa for “Tsk, tsk, tsk – so many excuses. It’s all about priorities, people! I mean, how is research, feeding your kid, or sleeping more important than THIS? I figure either shit or get off the pot!”

then Chall for “Alyssa> that goes for the hockey too, right? “feeding your kid” vs hockey picks. That’s a clear priority šŸ˜‰

(sorry, couldn’t resist.)”

then ScientistMother for “Ayssa – Chall beat me to this. But note, I had to drive, drink coffee AND feed the small child. You were complaining about just giving birth and a hockey pool. C’mon now, how hard is giving birth anyway?”

and finally Alyssa for “Oh, crap, I didn’t realize you had to do all those things! My most sincere apologies. Giving birth and then learning to take care of a newborn obviously does not compare to that!”


Oct 22 2010: Chall for “Sounds like a fun thing to do, keeping the notes I mean. You do know it’s the power…. to write what you want them to have decided ;)”

and Mermaid for “Maybe the solution is having one really horrible bus commuting experience to switch you back to the joys of cycling. Perhaps sitting beside someone with personal space and body odour issues….along with a cold, sneezing fits and a lack of tissue?

That would make your bike seem like a luxury!

Oct 29 2010: Mel for “i voted for hockey shootout/curling… drunk new years hockey only lost because you admitted already that you took your skates off (very UNcanadian) and also you did not say that it was below -20 degrees (which is critical to the Canadianness)!!!”

Mermaid for “Oh, there was curling, but we never really paid attention. As kids, it was far too tame and the good looking boys played hockey :)”

Professor in Training for “I only recently saw a picture of poutine – it looks like it could very well be my favourite food of all time as it contains all of my favourite ingredients that aren’t Doritos.”

and Bob O’H for “I like the status quo – I hoover up the easy answers, then retire to bed and leave the hard ones for you people in the Colonies.”

Nov 5 2010: Microbiologist XX for “We have a weekly group meeting that four PIs attend. Sometimes I get the feeling that if one person weren’t standing in front with a laser pointer, that we would never get the hell out of there.”

and Bob O’H for “I liked Clippy. Primarily because I could swear at him.
“It looks like you’re writing a letter.”
“No, fuck off and tell me the full reference for [redacted] et al. 1967, wanker”
“I don’t understand what you’re asking”
“Of course not. You’re a useless tosser who should go back to Seattle with all the other idiots who live there”
etc etc”

Nov 12 2010: Hermitage for “I’m such a wimp, I got the spooks just from reading about a frequency that resonates my eyeballs. Aiiiiii, abomination! Not of the lord! Squee, squee.”

Ricardipus for “You know, I think I will go through the whole pool without changing any picks at all. Think of it as a negative control.”

Chall for “of course, we all know the saying – up like a sun, down as a pancake – right?!”

and Antipodean for “Ooooh. I’m as excited as a kitten in it’s very own paper bag…”

Nov 26 2010:Ā  Massimo for “I think it’s true, you may be becoming more and more Canadian every day but… you’re still a Brit at taste buds :-)”

and Massimo again for “I think they are looking for a high-level administrator at my institution… I am sure they can make him a competitive offer. We only want the best, when it comes to bs.”

Dec 3 2010: Bumper two week edition!

EcoGeoFemme for “My friend’s husband went along with her to a meeting once. He went to the poster session and pretended he was an ecologist. I guess he had picked up enough from my friend that he was pretty convincing, even though he said he was in a somewhat different subfield from her. For some reason, this irritated me more than it made me laugh.”

Hermitage for “You love melancholy air? You are SUCH a Brit!” (hey, a little melancholy now and then is good for the soul!)

Nina for “I am delighted to see grey misty gloomy November weather in other places when I can finally go to work on flipflops and colleagues throw spontaneous wine tastings around afternoon teatime.”

Bob O’Hara for “I think that’s Chinese for “flower horribly infested with smut”.”

Dec 10 2010: Bob O’Hara for “Is that what people mean when they’re talking about an ‘elevator pitch’?”

Knutty Knitter for “There was an apocryphal story of one firm that just used to toss everything used into a basement on the basis that stuff had to be kept but no one said where or how. I shouldn’t think anything would be findable even if it was wanted. More likely an archaeological excavation would be required.”

Nina for “oh dear, this reminds me of my new year’s resolution of not piling up important documents. That’s exactely what I’ve been doing the last months, already I have 2 piles, one at work, one at home, with random important and not important things. About 2/3 of it is scanned as well and in several digital folders called variations of “important”.”

lin for “O how many hours I spent on this review I have written. Great way to immerse in a field you are not acquainted with. Yeah right. Great way to drown!

In hindsight (after three horrible horrible years) yes I learned stuff, yes it helped me make up my mind on the topic. No I would never ever ever recommend it.”

and Mermaid for “I don’t really understand contracted or new ‘buzz’ phrases that actually take longer to say than the original word/phrase. Example: On the ASAP (eh-ess-eh-pee) takes just as long to say as ‘As Soon As Possible’ – so what is the point?”

Nina for “Someone wrote on our whiteboard in the tearoom “microbes using Arsenic, my As”.”

Dec 17 2010: Hermitage for “For someone who likes melancholy air, your first sentences are relentlessly upbeat and charming!”

Eva for “When I was still in the lab, we’d always celebrate Chinese New Year with a dim sum lunch. One year I was too busy juggling a million experiments, so I stayed behind. I told a postdoc to bring me back a fortune cookie.

While everyone was away, the delivery guy came with an antibody on cold ice. I put it away immediately, and noticed that the order came with a gift: a little magnet. Even though the antibody was a common one, I figured I had deserved that magnet, because I was sad and lonely in the lab and everyone else was out celebrating Chinese New Year. So I kept the magnet all to myself, and stuck it above my bench.

When the lab returned, I opened my fortune cookie that they’d brought back for me. The fortune read “You have a very magnetic personality.””

Juniper Shoemaker for “Last week, I broke open a Panda Express fortune cookie only to discover the message “Overindulgence hinders both body and mind”. I thought this was a pretty rich admonition for a fast-food joint to be making.”

Dec 24 2010: Bob O’H for “The security guard really needs to get a cat. Then he can put a soft blanket on the big red button. The cat will sleep on the button whilst he goes off for a fag with the shark. Much safer all round, until the smoke sets off the fire alarm and the sprinklers, which send the bathers inside for cocktails.

The crab is then left in peace to get on with it’s cancerous activities.”

ScientistMother for “I voted for Ricardipus, because he is right. Monkeys could beat the Leafs.”

Eva for “There is one person who is guaranteed to NOT be amused by my comment, and that’s my dad.”

Thomas Joseph for “Part of the problem is I got engaged over the weekend,which means I haven’t been paying any attention to any of my fantasy sports picks.”, which was quickly corrected to “*ahem* I meant -reason- not -problem-. ;)”

and Ruchi for “I LOVE LOVE LOVE that last quote. AMAZING. I kinda want to tape it to Glenn Beck’s head. Or maybe my head, and make Glenn Beck look at me. Except then I would have to look at Glenn Beck.”

Jan 07 2011: Bob O’H for “Pah! Well, I went to Leeds this year.”

Cromercrox for “Wow, Cath – you should submit this post to whoever promotes tourism for BC.”

Eva for “Ahhhh, this reminds me of my student days in Amsterdam. We didn’t have more than one Christmas tree, and only at appropriate times, but we had Business Class seats from a KLM plane in the kitchen and they were hell to drag around whenever we needed to empty the kitchen for our annual theme party, which by definition ended when the police showed up at 5AM.”

(Explanation: “One of my flatmates worked at the airport, and they were replacing seats in one of the planes. She asked what happened to the old ones, and they were just going throw them out! So she called someone with a car, and took 2x 2 seats home. But that was a little too crowded so we ended up keeping only one pair. It was fun to sit in there and eat dinner from the tray table =)”)

and Hermitage for “That’s the way it always goes. They always start out with some small tree that the dealer puts on sale just for ā€˜first-timers’, and they end up surrounded by four trees, crying ā€œjust one more angel decoration, just one!ā€”

Jan 14 2011: Alyssa for “My brother and I used to snoop for our gifts, and we found out my parents liked hiding them in a locked filing cabinet. The cabinet could easily be broken into using a letter opener though, so we snooped for a couple years. Then, one year, the letter opener broke in the lock, and that was the end of that! Our parents were so mad that they told us they took back the gifts! Luckily they had a soft spot and ended up giving them to us anyway (or maybe the stores had awful return policies then). Fun times!”

Nina for “It sounds very familiar, you working Mr E-man shopping … It would be even better if we didn’t have to work and they would still do the shopping.”

and Ricardipus for “I like this idea too, but I see endless potential for the same kinds of eye-blistering visual abuse which now permeates all but a very small percentage of PowerPoint presentations…”

Jan 21 2010: bean-mom for “Oh, just looked at the title of your post. You wrote this whole post just to use that pun, didn’t you?”

Ricardipus for “w00t! Home (ok, ā€œworkā€) town team is on a streak! Nyaaa nyaaa to Edmonton, Islanders, and New Jersey… and nobody else…

Never mind.”

Chall for “As it looks right now I have use for TWO shirts from the wardrobe…” (the benefits of supporting multiple teams in the same league!)

Hermitage for “I can’t imagine the horror of being told that these are ā€˜the years of your life’ when you are faced with the stark reality that a lot of your peers are glorious assholes. I’m glad the realities of prepubescent dickitude are acknowledged and people are attempting to rectify it instead of blowing it off with ā€˜kids will be kids, now let’s set that broken nose’.”

Silver Fox for “I always thought that star signs were there to enable tacky pick up lines in bars. (And so you’d know for sure to who to run from – ie, the person who just used the tacky pick up line.)”

Hermitage again for “I had an English teacher who would go around the class and tell you if you were going to pass or fail her class (and at life), using astrology as her excuse for being a narsty witch. Ofc, if she decided she didn’t like you at midterms, the meaning of your sign would suddenly shift to mean you were a twit-pansy.”

Chall (again) for “ahhh…. how sweet. I am still the most awesome, fabulous, centered, famous and wonderful leader who is adored by most people! ;)”

and ScientistMother for “This is the perfect ending to a horrible week. I’ve been battling with monkey, trying to get to campus for a 9 am lecture, found out I need to spend yet another $1000.00 of my fucking car and now I am no longer a PISCES!!!! This is horrible news, what am I supposed to divorce my husband who is the perfect match for me (He’s a cancer?). This is why we had so many arguement last year, bc we are not matched correctly. Fuck. Dude. Sigh

Anyone know a good lawyer?”

Jan 28 2011: Beth for “OMG! I’m not a Capricorn anymore! I don’t even know what a Sagittarius is supposed to be like! Hopefully it will be a list of generic positive characteristics that can apply to anyone!”

Ricardipus for “As for astrology… can I throw in the ā€œChinese zodiacā€ as well? Everyone born in the same year? Gimme a break.*

*possibly slightly bitter because I’m a flaming sheep, apparently.”

Mike for “I was a Libra, but Librans don’t believe in all that shit so there’s no point checking to see if I still am.

I’ve come across remarkably few friends or colleagues who actually believe in astrology. But if you’re still unsure about ridiculing believers about this stuff, just ask them if they realise that your gravitational field has (milky) waaaay more physical influence on them than any of the other heavenly bodies they feel so controlled by.”

Antipodean for “Favourite scientist names game (optional rule: must be in pubmed to qualify?)

My personal favourite: Fabio Pizza.”

KristiV for “I’m a fan of interesting author combinations on papers, e.g. Fatt and Katz (1952).

i don’t think it gets much better than Fatt and Katz, actually.”

Cromercrox for “There is a well-known collaboration of scientists that works on skin microflora. Just ask PubMed for ā€˜Dark and Strange’, or, as it may be, ā€˜Strange and Dark’.”

and Hermitage for “It would actually make sense for most cellular mechanisms to be regulated by millions of segments of lolcats. The whole damn business is unruly and makes no fucking sense.”

Feb 04 2011: Stephen for “This is why we had to shoot the dog. Either you have career goals or you don’t. ;-)”

Steve Caplan for “The ā€œknights who say NIHā€ā€¦”

TheGrinch for “It would have been fantastic had Dixie [the dog] swallowed Blackberry and it came out the other end as a completely ready grant proposal.”

and lin for “I have heard a rumor that the weather people are always creating a ā€œlight at the end of the tunnelā€ for all kinds of weather, because people will complain to much, get depressed and suicide rates go up. Probably not true, but as a result I never trust the ā€œlook, at the end is getting betterā€ cheerful chirps.

(Plus I once was at a camping in France that actually did that thing to keep campers from packing and going to another sunnier part of the country. Buying a local newspaper proved a better way of staying informed on the continuation of pouring rain for weeks, so we left)”

Feb 11 2011:

Hermitage for “I guess I’m the only one that sees an Über Viking rising from the flames in that photo?

Ok, I’ll be over here in this corner then *whistles*.”

Steve Caplan for “Deer Cath,

I am in the fnal stgaes of prepairing my epic manyouscript. Will u pleaze edith it form e?”

Steffi Suhr for “The lack of acknowledgement is a bit of a pet peeve of mine also for general support and project management, though. This reminds me of my old plans to start an international union of science support staff…”

and LK for “I recently sent a paper back with a note that it wouldn’t be considered ā€˜received’ until the gene and organism names in the title matched those in the abstract…sigh…

And consider adding another ā€˜rule’ – sure, go ahead and title your submission ā€œManuscriptā€, ā€œResearch_Paperā€, or ā€œJournalTitleSubmissionā€ (even spelled correctly), because that will make it easy for me to find your paper among all the others I get with the exact same name…it’s like sending me your resume and calling it ā€˜resume’.”

Post(s) of the Week:

Oct 1 2010: CromerCrox for “Ancestral furniture” (in CC’s family, “when the elder male of the clan reaches his mid-forties, he is seized by an implacable urge to make pine dressers”. There are some impressive furniture making genes in this family!)

and Scicurious for “The lab your lab could BE LIKE!” and “The Old Spice lab: Does YOUR lab smell like an Old Spice lab?” (fantasizing about Isaiah Mustafa turning reagents into data. I’m on a stool. HYAH!)

Oct 8 2010: KJHaxton for “Lady Lab Coat Ga Ga” (the frustration of trying to find a practical lab coat for a woman that doesn’t leave you looking like “a rectangular polycotton yeti”)

Masks of Eris for “The teaching-assistantial mind at work” (messing with students’ minds through the medium of URLs)

and Eva Amsen for “No-one cares about your blog (part 2)” (a very funny tale of a t-shirt, and an excellent reminder to those of us prone to MEta-blogging that really, no-one cares).

Oct 15 2010: travel and reading hilarious comments cut into my blog-reading time this week!

Prof-like Substance for “Job vacancy: journal club killa” (there’s one in every department!)

and Alyssa for Misery wars (Four kinds of oneupmanship. Can you think of any more?)

Oct 22 2010: Thomas Joseph for “#UnK3rn3d: Life Outside the Lab?” (excellent rebuttal to Scott Kern)
Anthony Fejes for “Science blogs and Caveat Emptor. A comment on an Analytical Chemistry editorial” (excellent rebuttal to Royce Murray)

Eva Amsen for “Technical paper: home-made mocha optimization” (Abstract: “I made instant mocha at work and am now writing a silly blog post about it.”)

Kimli for “False advertising” (Kimli’s experience with the iPhone Facetime video calling feature does not quite match the one promised in those commercials)

and Alyssa for “My eyes! My eyes!” (I don’t have a formal award for “most hideous furniture of the week”, but maybe I should start one?)

Oct 29 2010: Jenny Rohn for “In which I defend a bit of honest ignorance” (does it matter that most people don’t understand technical scientific terms?)

Chall for “…not in Kansas any more…” (an encounter in the “wrong” neighbourhood opens up a new career option that could be so, so right…)

and Information is Beautiful for “The true size of Africa” (some stunning maps that put country & continent sizes into perspective)

Nov 5 2010: Nina for “In the fume hood” (Nina continues to crack me up, this time with an explanation for why she got to experience a large aftershock from inside the hood)

and The Digital Cuttlefish for “My place in the dance of the universe” (I have to admit that I’ve been neglecting ol’ Cuttle lately, but this post made me realise what an eejit I’d been not to keep up with his blog)

Nov 12 2010: It’s all Hermitage all the time! Check out this awesome series on “How Gaming Makes me a Better Graduate Student”: Glossary, Intro, PvE vs PvP, and Gear (with more to come next week, I think). I know next to nothing about gaming, and thought the whole series was fantastic!

Oh, and Beth gets a shout-out too, for the awesome Vegetarian Lady Gaga costume she wore to my Hallowe’en party last week.

Nov 26 2010: Bob O’Hara for “Why Libel Needs to be Reformed” (funny post (hee hee! Just noticed the URL as I added the link) about a serious subject. Please sign the petition, wherever you may live, because English libel law affects YOU).

and StyleyGeek for “Remind me why we are using a wiki again?” (almost too familiar to be funny. Almost).

Dec 3 2010: Bumper two week edition!

The Bean-Mom for “What’s important” (very sad but beautifully written tale of loss)

Prof-like Substance for “But those grant reviews are unreasonable!” (how even ridiculous reviews can improve your proposal)

Chall for “Tale of two languages” (fantastic post and comments thread about living, working, thinking, and dreaming in more than one language)

Jennifer Rohn for “In which I correspond” (the story behind getting permission to use the poetry quoted in her new book. Canadian authors FTW!)

Cromercrox for “Guinea pigs for a guinea pig?” (the story behind the next global publishing phenomenon: Defiant the guineapig: Firefighter!)

Richard P. Grant for “Onlooker” (geeky googly goodness)

and Ugliest Tattoos for “Tomorrow, on Springer” (excellent visual pun)

Dec 10 2010: Massimo for “My PI wrote me a letter” (best post I’ve ever read about reference letters)

and BiochemBelle for “Gender and blogging (and everything else) (excellent answer to all the usual questions about why women-only science blog feeds are needed)

Dec 17 2010: Bob O’Hara for “Blame the system” (a “noncooperative regulatory system” is, unfortunately, not quite what it sounds like)

Jenny Rohn for “In which I come over all SF” (“cells assault sergeant” is, unfortunately, not quite what it sounds like)

and Uphilldowndale for “Spud on Sunday part V” (Dog + snow. What else do you need?)

Dec 24 2010: PZ Myers for “Vignette from the grading wars” (10% of students can’t name a female scientist?!)

Stephen Curry for “Arsenic up for review” (Stephen attempts to turn sodium arsenate dibasic heptahydrate into the next Three Wolf Moon Shirt)

Kimli for “Vancouver is pretty” (love the photos, really love the caption saying “I live here!” I have incredulous moments like that myself sometimes, most recently this morning)

and Regretsy for “Glingers” (Spoof Regretsy post on gloves that are just fingers – featuring some “lappunk” gloves and a bonus “test-tube fascinator”!)

Jan 07 2011: ScientistMother for “Replications” (Quite possibly the best pregnancy announcement of all time)

Steve Caplan for “Early exposure to skeptical thinking: navigating the chicken and egg syndrome” (if you start your kids on the right path early, they’ll out-think any number of grad students!)

and Information is Beautiful for “Visualizing bloodtests” (making cholesterol test results much more meaningful for patients)

Jan 14 2011: Fake Science for “Temperature conversion table” (the best possible way to convert between Celsius and Fahrenheit)

Eva Amsen for “What’s stats got to do with it?” (learning to appreciate stats as well as data and graphs)

Bob O’H for “Predictions for 2011” (what’s in store for the science blogosphere this year?)

Ricardipus (at The Occam’s Typewriter Irregulars blog) for “Genome assembly – a primer for the Shakespeare fan” (he claims the pun in the title was unintentional, but it’s still a very cleverly done post)

The Bean-Mom for “Lull” (hilarious tales of Christmas at the Bean House)

Richard Grant for “On lucky breaks” (fossil hunting! And finding! With photos!)

Massimo for “Teaching and research: horse and carriage, or oil and water?” (a brave attempt to correlate H-index scores with RateMyProfessor scores. Great post, go and read it!)

and DrugMonkey for “A simple change would help the NIH grant process contribute less to the leaky pipeline” (simple change = “be more like Canada”. I’m bookmarking this post to read when all our various funding agencies start pissing me off)

Jan 21 2010: Jenny Rohn for “In which I tire of the old paradigms” (does dropping a plate of cells mean Jenny “falsified the hypothesis that I could perform an experiment to completion without screwing it up”? Or is it time to lose the Popperian view of science?)

Cromercrox for “Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Picturesque Seaside Town of Cromer” (an outsider’s perplexity at US gun culture. Comes complete with fantastic comments thread)

Information is Beautiful for “A decade of fear” (visualising media scare stories about SARS, vaccines, asteroids and more)

Jan 28 2011: Athene Donald for “Do scientists believe in luck?” (do you have to be good to be lucky, and lucky to be good?)

Massimo for “Change that might do you good” (excellent, thoughtful post about changing research fields)

Richard P Grant for “On holding back the tide” (a suggested patron saint for science writers and communicators who try to hold back the tides of ignorance and woo)

and Nina for “NZ explorations part 1: Abel Tasman National Park” (almost disqualified because she – unbelievably – didn’t include a single photo from the kayak tour. Seriously – WTF, Nina?! Redeemed by the sentence “So you see, wherever you are on the world, some helpful mother will comment on your life.”)

Feb 04 2011: Massimo for “Change that will (probably) do you no good” (second of a pair of posts about changing research fields, focusing this time on the (probably) bad reasons for switching)

Hermitage for “The Academia Ghetto” (on the perceived second-class status of academic awards targeted at minorities in science)

Silver Fox for “How to make coffee strandlines or rythmites” (using stratified caffineite, aka jarves (from Java-varves), to assess daily patterns in the rate of evaporation of caffeinated beverages)

and Uphilldowndale for “Sun blush” (gorgeous photos that make me homesick)

Feb 11 2011: Frank Norman for “Ethical retrieval” (the ethics of subject classifications and search engine algorithms)

and Katherine Haxton for “Greatest chemist of all time” (how many of the great discoveries were due to being in the right place at the right time?)

Posted in meta | 5 Comments

Friday Quiz: Missing Links

It’s time for another quiz taken from my puzzle of the day desk calendar! I think I’m going to have to buy myself another calendar next year if Santa doesn’t bring me one; it’s provided some really fun blogging experiences. (Either that or I’m going to have  to make up my own quizzes, which sounds too much like hard work).

This time the aim is to fill in the missing middle word on each line, so that the first two words AND the last two words of each set form a scientific(ish) term. As a non-sciency example, fill in the gap below

GREEN ________ BAG

with the word TEA, to form the terms GREEN TEA and TEA BAG.

As before, answer in the comments in any order you like – but please submit only one answer per person per hour, to give as many people as possible a chance to play!  

  1. DRY __ICE__ AGE (Lisbeth)
  2. STROBE _LIGHT_ WAVE (Pika)
  3. BINARY __STAR__ FISH (Alyssa)
  4. FOOD _CHAIN_ REACTION (Bob)
  5. HEAVY _WATER_ TABLE (Anonymous)
  6. PERPETUAL _MOTION_ SICKNESS (Mermaid)
  7. CLEAN __ROOM__ TEMPERATURE (Chall)
  8. FUEL __CELL__ DIVISION (Schlupp)
  9. COMMON __COLD__ FUSION (Pika)
  10. LAND __MASS__ SPECTROMETER (Alyssa)

I got all but one of the answers. Let’s just say that I came up with some fairly ridiculous guesses (binary cat? Code fish?) out of desperation, and felt rather silly when I saw the answer!

I’ll update the post with the answers and bragging rights as and when I get time, and I’ll add clues if there are any unanswered questions after a day or two.

Have fun!

Posted in competition, English language, science, silliness | 46 Comments

Hockey Pool!

Back for the 2010-2011 season by popular demand*!

The pool works in the same way as last year’s: you pick two centres, four wingers, three defensemen and one goalie from the lists on the website. (The lists highlight injured and suspended players to help you avoid players who aren’t playing that week!) Each player on the list has a value of 1 – 10 based on past and predicted performance. The challenge is to put together a team that will score the most fantasy points while not exceeding the value “cap” of 50. You get one point for every goal and assist scored by your forwards and defensemen, one point for every win by your goalie, and two points for a shut-out by your goalie.

You can change your picks every week if you want, or keep the same team if you can’t be bothered or if you miss the pick submission deadline for that week (unless they change the point values assigned to the players based on mid-season performance and you end up over the cap – you have to re-pick if that happens).

Sign up here, enter your picks, and then please email me at vwxynot [at] gmail [dot] com to get the name and password of the group I’ve set up. All regular readers, commenters and lurkers alike, are very welcome to play, but I would like to make sure that I know who everyone is and no random people sneak in!

The first pick deadline is Thursday October 7th

The prize is a $20 Amazon gift certificate! (more if any other players want to chip in!)

I originally hesitated about running a pool this year, as the weekly update posts became a bit of a chore last time. But ScientistMother has kindly offered to share the load! Yay, ScientistMother! You rock! So we’ll each do one update every four weeks, alternating so the updates come every two weeks. If we’re going to have weekly updates, like last time, we’ll need two or more other people to take part on a rotating basis… hint hint…

YAY, HOCKEY!

*ScientistMother and Chall. They’re popular around here!

Posted in competition, hockey pool 2009-2010, sport | 23 Comments

Podcath Part II

It’s been about 18 months since I made my first forays into the world of podcasts, and I am officially hooked! Thanks to some excellent suggestions in the comments of my last podcast post, some recommendations from my hilarious new sister-in-law, and some finds I’ve made on my own, I have more podcasts than I have time to listen to, and I love it! I listen to music podcasts all day at work, and spoken word while I’m getting ready in the morning, stretching, exercising (it happens occasionally), cooking, cleaning, and when I’m on the bus or SkyTrain.

There have been a couple of times recently when a friend (most recently Alyssa) has asked for new music recommendations, and I’ve referred them to podcasts rather than bands. This is how I find most of my new music now – if I like something I hear on a podcast, I write it down (sometimes rather cryptically) and look it up on iTunes later. (Given that I listen to a lot of unsigned band podcasts the songs I like aren’t always available in the store, but I’ll try again every few months). So I thought I’d list my favourite podcasts here for easy reference! I’m still listening to all the podcasts I mentioned last time, but for this post I’ll focus on the new stuff.

I’m too lazy to find all the links, but I’m sure my readers are perfectly capable of looking things up in iTunes or wherever else you get your podcasts from!

My favourite podcast in each category is in blue.

Music – single song podcasts

  • Current Song of the Day – Minnesota Public Radio
  • Indiefeed – I subscribe to the Alternative/Modern Rock, Blues, Dance, Electronica, Hip Hop and Indie Pop channels. I <3 Indiefeed!
  • KEXP Song of the Day
  • NPR: Second Stage
  • Triple J (recommended by Professor in Training and Mermaid)

Music – multisong podcasts

  • Bands Under the Radar – excellent tunes, but the length (~2 hours) can sometimes be a bit much.
  • CBC Radio 3 – an online-only radio station that plays exclusively Canadian music, all genres, live and studio recorded. I subscribe to the combined feed to get all their podcasts. There’s so much more to Canadian music than Bryan Adams, Celine Dion, Nickelback and Justin Bieber! 
  • Coverville – a new find. The shows alternate between sets of covers of / by a specific artist, and “who did it better?” episodes featuring two or three versions of the same song by different artists, with an online poll so you can vote for your favourite.
  • Mad Decent Worldwide Radio – more uptempo and clubby than anything else I listen to. Good for a late afternoon energy boost.
  • NPR: Live Concerts – great if you like the band they’re featuring, but some of the longer live shows can be a drag if you’re not into the band; I end up skipping about a third of them. They also have a habit of not updating for ages and then dumping eight 90 minute shows into the feed at once, which causes problems for those of us with limited space on our 8GB iPhones!
  • The Sound Culture – again more clubby than the others, but less so than Mad Decent. I really like this one.
  • Triple J: New Unearthed Music – unsigned Aussie bands. (Recommended by Professor in Training and Mermaid)

Music – Blues
At one point I downloaded the entire back catalogue of the Indiefeed Blues podcast, and listened to ten tracks a day for a couple of weeks. I quickly realised that blues is the perfect music to work to; I don’t know why, but something just gels. True aficionados will be horrified by this, but the specific band or song don’t seem to matter – the whole genre works for me!

  • BluzNdaBlood
  • Friday Night Blues – a bit more high energy than the others.
  • Murphy’s Saloon – the host sounds grumpy is a prince among men, the soul of patience, and tells a bad joke on each episode, but and the music’s great šŸ™‚ <– see comments šŸ™‚
  • Nothing but the Blues – the only UK-based blues podcast on my list, although the tracks are international, and the only one that plays some old (sometimes really, really old) recordings mixed in with the more modern stuff.
  • Texas Blues Cafe

Moving on to spoken word…


Canadiana

  • The Hour with George Stroumboulopoulos (video) – George (aka Canada’s Boyfriend) is a Canadian institution, but you don’t have to be Canadian to appreciate the sheer awesomeness of his guests. Current episodes on my phone include Slash, Michael Moore, Hillary Clinton, and (d’oh!) Nickelback. The interviews are always interesting!
  • Today in Canadian History – daily short (~8 minute) snippets about recent and (relatively) ancient history – everything from Captain Vancouver’s voyages up the west coast to sport to politics to space exploration. The shows feature interviews with some very interesting people (an astronaut today!) including academics, politicians, and lots of others.
  • Vinyl Cafe Stories – OMG I LOVE this show! The host, Stuart McLean, has a true gift as a story teller and as someone who can find extraordinary pleasure in the most ordinary things. He once spent ten minutes praising mandarin oranges and it was fantastic. It took me a little while to get into the stories he tells of a fictitious family – you have to get to know the characters – but it’s been totally worth it. Sometimes very, very funny, sometimes very, very sad, but you always get a lovely warm-and-fuzzy feeling. The live shows also feature music and readers’ own stories. My all-time favourite podcast. (Recommended by Alyssa and Wayfarer Scientista. Thank you!)

Comedy

  • The Moth – live recordings of people standing up and telling a true story from their life, without notes. Not all of the stories are funny, but almost all of them are interesting and well worth listening to. 
  • NPR: Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me! – comedy news quiz. Great stuff, especially once you get to know the panellists! (Recommended by EcoGeoFemme)
  • Zeitgeist (video) – short snippets of silly news stories presented by a host with a really dry sense of humour.

News/current events/other

  • The bike podcast – from the Guardian. UK-oriented, but great listening for all the cyclists (recreational, race, and/or commuter) out there.
  • From Our Own Correspondent – from the BBC. Each episode features several short reports on current events (or just cultural observations) from foreign correspondents based all over the world, mostly serious but with one more light-hearted story at the end. Extremely high quality journalism.
  • Savage Love – I LOVE Dan Savage, having been introduced to his weekly column (syndicated in our awesome free weekly  indie paper, the Georgia Straight) by a labmate during my first month in Vancouver. This show is not for the squeamish as some of the sexual problems people call in with are rather weird and wonderful, but his advice is (usually) great and I think he’s really doing some important work on this podcast and in his column. Check out his “it gets better” video campaign, which aims to bring hope to gay teens being bullied at school by describing to them the life as happy, well adjusted gay adults that they can’t imagine having for themselves while stuck in small-town high school life.
  • This American Life – two or three stories on a given theme per episode. Again, the quality of the journalism is great and they find some amazing stories. Sometimes funny, mostly serious. (Recommended by Wayfarer Scientista and EcoGeoFemme)
  • WNYC’s Radiolab – similar to This American Life, but with scientific themes. The shows are really well done and appeal strongly to me (a scientist) and Mr E Man (not a scientist, but interested in Stuff In General). THIS is how you bring science to the public!

Great, now the next time anyone asks for new music recommendations, I can just give them a link! And if anyone has any new suggestions, bring it on! Maybe I can do a Part III in another 18 months.

I might review my favourite iPhone apps (mostly games) next, if anyone’s interested!

Posted in blog buddies, Canada, current affairs, cycling, embarrassing fan girl, music, technology | 11 Comments

Steamjunk

“What’s wrong with your whiteboard?”, asked a colleague this morning.

I didn’t know anything was wrong with my whiteboard, which I use to keep track of grant deadlines, grants and manuscripts currently under review, and PI travel dates. But sure enough, on closer inspection it became clear that while the bottom left corner is flush to the wall, as it should be,

straight flush

the bottom right corner is, well, not.

no force or movement of the whiteboard was involved in the taking of this photo… the corner of the board is a good 5cm or so off the wall

The culprit?

Oops.

I guess regular steam baths and tea breaks aren’t as good for whiteboards as they are for the people who write on them.

Posted in freakishness, photos, silliness | 7 Comments

Public recognition

My former student was on TV yesterday!

Well, not the real TV. Just the fancy flat screen monitor mounted high on a wall by the elevators in my building. The TV appeared a few months ago and originally featured reminders of upcoming talks, bake sales and other fundraisers, and the occasional social event. However, The Powers That Be recently decided to add announcements of published papers and grant awards to the programme listings: just top tier journals and grants over a million dollars to start with, but they’ve now expanded the initiative to include all papers (including my postdoc lab’s new review paper) and multi-year grants.

I think this is a great idea, especially in a large multi-department building where it’s impossible to know everyone. My awesome, friendly, super-social postdoc department already did (and I think still does) something similar: when your paper got published, or your abstract was accepted for an oral presentation at a conference, you printed a copy out (abstracts on colour-coded paper according to the date of the presentation) and gave it to one of the secretaries, who would ceremoniously staple it to the Wall of Honour. It could then be appreciated in all its glory by your respectfully jealous* colleagues, and by bored visitors waiting for someone to find the PI they’d come to see.

Other departments in our building seem to have similar Walls of Honour in place. However, my current department (not known for being particularly social) doesn’t do anything other than get its papers onto the new screen downstairs. Some of the PIs I work with provide champagne and nibbles to everyone involved when a paper gets into a top tier journal, and occasionally when they get a big grant, but those occasions are rare and there’s no formal recognition of smaller achievements. I’d be tempted to try and correlate lab sociability with public recognition of success, but the institute where I did my PhD was even more awesome, friendly, and social than my postdoc department, and they didn’t do anything special either.

Although, thinking back, maybe that was because we all knew each other so well that we always knew when someone’s paper had come out because they’d buy the first round on Friday night…

How does your lab / department / institute recognise milestones such as papers, presentations, grants and fellowships? Do you think there’s any association with how social your department is?

———————

*depending on the journal / conference

Posted in career, conferences, grant wrangling, publishing, science | 11 Comments

Hankie enlightenment

I found an absolute gem in my automated search results this morning: a bio of a man I know fairly well, having worked for two of the organisations named in the piece. However, it turns out that I didn’t know him anywhere near as well as I thought I did. I never knew, for example, that this man “as good as graduated with a BSc in Biology”1, or that he has an “MSc in dungeon physiology”2. And apparently “during his healing precision he was severely shabby”3.

I had no idea.

Judging by the torturous grammar and hilarious word choices, the bio seems to have been dragged through several iterations of Google Translate (or possibly just translated by my cat Google, which is an equally good explanation).

Google had a tough day on Sunday

I’m guessing that someone with less than stellar English then replaced every second or third word using a random selection from a thesaurus.

Now, we all know that science and spell checkers don’t mix, but apparently scientific language forms an even more disastrous partnership with automated translation tools and/or careless thesaurus use. From disaster, however, springs hilarity: the cell/dungeon confusion was funny enough, but my absolute favourite part was the translation of “tissue culture” as “hankie enlightenment”.

Genius.

As soon as I could stop laughing, I sent the link to several friends who also know the distiguished dungeon physiologist in question. One of them pointed out that the torturous translation process was no doubt intended to disguise the text’s origin as a plagiarised Wikipedia entry.

Compare and contrast.

It truly is a privilege to see such outstanding scholarship in action!

——————– 

1) the many instances of “as good as” seem to be replacements for “as well as”, “and”, & “also”
2) “dungeon” = “cell”
3) apparently, “severely shabby” = “greatly influenced”, as in by a particular mentor. I had to check this one against the original text.

Posted in English language, furry friends, photos, science, silliness | 14 Comments

Cath has misheard that the bird is the word

A wonderful bird is the pelican,
His mouth can hold more than his belly can,
He can hold in his beak,
Enough food for a week.
I’m damned if I know how the hell he can!

(by Dixon Lanier Merritt, apparently. Not Ogden Nash. You learn something new every day!)


And I’m damned if I know how the hell I can have made the same ridiculous mistake twice.

It’s all because of my habit of paying only partial attention to the TV. I’m usually doing something else at the same time – eating, talking, playing a game on my phone, reading a book, surfing the web, playing with a cat or two, that kind of thing. So some time last year, while I was “watching” the local news, I was startled to hear the anchor say that there’d been a pelican attack in one of Vancouver’s eastern suburbs! By the time I’d looked up at the screen he’d moved on to another story, leaving me completely baffled and with some very odd mental images running through my brain.

Fortunately, the CBC website was running the same story – about a pellet gun attack.

Which made more sense.

Fast forward to last night, when Mr E Man and I were watching Survivor. I loooove Survivor (it’s an extremely guilty pleasure), so I was actually watching it properly. However, during the commercial breaks I was paying attention to Saba, who was sprawled all over me and purring contentedly as I rubbed her belly. I was vaguely aware that there was some kind of cosmetics advert on the screen, but was suddenly snapped into full alertness by a rather bizarre slogan I’d just heard.

“The colour of pelicans???!!!”, I blurted out before I could stop myself.

Mr E Man eventually managed to gasp out the word “elegance” in between fits of laughter.

Oops.

In my defense, it’s still a ridiculous slogan. And later on in the show they actually showed some pelicans flying past the beach, which set us off laughing again. I suspect they’d already shown a similar shot before the commercial, which helped to trigger the confusion. Either that or I have a very bizarre subconscious.

Ooh! That just reminded me of something. Hang on a minute, Googling:

Ah, yes, I was right! 

To (mis)quote Douglas Adams in The Long Dark Teatime of the Soul:

It was a couple of days before Kate Schechter became aware of any of these things, or indeed of anything at all in the outside world.

She passed the time quietly in a world of her own in which she was surrounded as far as the eye could see with old cabin trunks full of past memories in which she rummaged with great curiosity, and sometimes bewilderment. Or, at least, about a tenth of the cabin trunks were full of vivid, and often painful or uncomfortable memories of her past life; the other nine-tenths were full of penguins pelicans, which surprised her. Insofar as she recognised at all that she was dreaming, she realised that she must be exploring her own subconscious mind. She had heard it said that humans are supposed only to use about a tenth of their brains, and that no one was very clear what the other nine-tenths were for, but she had certainly never heard it suggested that they were used for storing penguins pelicans.

So there you go. It’s not my fault, it’s just the way the human brain evolved.

Weirdly, like this post just did.

Posted in English language, freakishness, furry friends, limericks, nature, silliness, television | 12 Comments