A tale of two sisters

My sister is one of my favourite people in the whole world. She’s the person I miss the most from the UK, and although I love my three Canadian sisters-in-law dearly*, it’s just not quite the same.

There was only ever going to be one answer to the “so who’s gonna be your bridesmaid?!” question

Sis is two years younger than me, and always managed to be better than me at everything. I got excellent grades, but she always went just a little bit further, taking more subjects and managing to avoid the B I got in GCSE music. I sucked at sports, but she was in the school and county and/or city netball, field hockey, and cross country running teams. I got my Grade 6 music exam (classical guitar); she got her Grade 7 (clarinet). Thank the flying spaghetti monster that I’m the older one and didn’t have to follow her and meet the expectations she set!

Fortunately for me, we chose different subjects in high school. There was lots of overlap in the GCSEs (the exams we took at the age of 16) we got, since certain core subjects are compulsory. However, when it came to our A level courses, we diverged significantly. At the time, students had to choose three (or occasionally four) subjects to study for the final two (optional) years of high school. I chose biology, chemistry and maths; sis chose history, French, and English language.

The interesting thing – and a sign of what was to come – is that when sis was making her choices, my Dad asked what we each would have chosen if we could have taken five subjects. I would have added French and history to my choices, and she would have added biology and maths to hers. So from no overlap at all in our three actual choices, with five we would have 80% of our subjects in common.

As it was though, we each followed our own paths. You know mine: undergrad degree in genetics, PhD in molecular cell biology, postdoc in molecular biology and genome evolution, marketing in the biotech industry, cancer research grant wrangler. My sister followed in the footsteps of both our parents, plus an auntie and a cousin, and did her degree in modern languages – French and Italian, to be precise**. Her department wanted her to stay and do a PhD, but she decided that this time she wouldn’t try to outdo me, and went off to do an internship in the publishing industry in London (hence continuing her trend of moving ever further south, while I kept moving north and/or west).

Sis chose non-fiction, rather than fiction publishing, because editors get to have more input into the final product than in the fiction industry; they can suggest additions to the content, for example. To be honest I’ve lost track of her exact series of jobs because she moved around a lot in the first few years, but I know that she started off in the mind/body/spirit field (everything from astrology to fitness to psychology) before moving into a more medical/scientific space; her last job was at a journal publishing company that specialises in annual compilations of scientific review articles.

She just started a new job though, one she’s very excited about. Like me when I moved into my current job, she’s absolutely delighted to find herself in the non-profit sector, where the pay may be lower but people are (generally) nicer and everything’s not just about the money. She’s now helping to manage the publishing arm of one of the British medical professional societies, or Royal Colleges. Their output includes a journal, textbooks, electronic learning resources, special reports, clinical guidelines, and information for the public.

So, although we took very different paths through high school, university, and the early years of our respective careers, my sister and I now both have jobs where a large part of our role is to write and edit text about the same kind of cancer.

I say “it must be genetic”, she says “Mamma Mia!”, but we both think it’s hilarious and awesome.

Well, something’s definitely genetic.

——————
*I decided at the weekend, at the wedding of Mr E Man’s brother to my newest sister-in-law, that if men get to “brothers from another mother”, we get to be “sisters from distant misters”

Me and my lovely three sisters-in-law sisters-from-distant-misters on Saturday
**Mum: Spanish and French; Dad: French and German; Auntie: Spanish and Italian; Cousin: French and psychology. Plus one of my uncles has a degree in English, and another cousin who didn’t go to university is fluent in German. I’m considered a freak in my family, although both of my male cousins are in technical fields, so I’m not completely alone.
Posted in career, education, family, personal, photos, publishing, science | 23 Comments

Making a difference

Hey, remember my colleague* who did the fundraising bike ride to Seattle with me and was the star of my video?

(Here’s the video again)

Well, he’s all over the news this week thanks to his two very, very interesting new papers on ovarian cancer!

The first identifies Arid1a as a novel tumour suppressor gene that’s mutated in clear cell and endometrioid cancers of the ovary, and the second recommends the removal of the fallopian tubes during hysterectomy and tubal ligation in order to reduce the risk of developing ovarian cancer. (Neither paper is on PubMed yet, so the links go to news articles instead). I’ve heard this PI talk about both subjects for a couple of years now, and it’s so exciting to see the research maturing and progressing!

Once again, THANK YOU to all my lovely readers who donated to the ride this year!


——————————

*one of my jobs is to try and bump our departmental website up the Google rankings for each PI’s name – this is why I won’t be naming names on my blog!

Posted in fund raising, medicine, original research, science | 4 Comments

Environmentalist loonies

I recently came across an environmental campaign that is so unique, so creative, and so effective, that it blew me away.

This is a Canadian one dollar coin, aka loonie*, featuring an image of a common loon, and also Gavia immer on the other side (sorry, Your Majesty! Couldn’t resist that one).

This is the loonie I got in my change last week:

(it’s a sticker, in case that’s not obvious from the photo!)

WOW. Seriously nice work – what a striking, unambiguous combination of image and URL.

Of course I went straight to their website, where I signed the petition – Enbridge Inc wants to bring the first ever crude oil supertankers to Canada’s Pacific north coast, and this group is asking Parliament to legislate a permanent ban on oil tankers in these waters.

I also found a solution to my dilemma. See, I love my modified loonie so much that I want to keep it, but I also understand that the whole point is to keep it circulating so others can see it and be inspired to sign the petition. So I’ve donated $10 in exchange for 42 decals that I can attach to other loonies and send out into the wild.


Seriously, the people behind this campaign are geniuses.

————-

*two dollar coins are, of course, called toonies. When Mad Hatter visited last year she needed change for a $10 bill for her bus fare, and the waitress she asked replied “sure, are loonies and toonies OK?” Mad Hatter turned to me with a look of sheer uncomprehending panic that was absolutely hilarious!

Posted in activism, Canada, current affairs, environment, nature, photos, politics | 13 Comments

Tuesday Pet Peeve: Careless North Americans

A certain phrase has been on my mental pet peeves list for a while. Every time I hear someone say it, it jars – it’s not one of those UK*/North America differences where both ways are equally valid and I just have to get used to it, because the North American version is clearly just plain WRONG!

However, for some reason I’ve never felt quite strongly enough about this issue to blog about it (not on a Tuesday, anyway).

Last week, though, I was catching up on some (very) old podcasts and found that John Cleese has already said everything I wanted to say on the matter, much more eloquently than I ever could:

(ETA: Eva pointed out that David Mitchell has had a very similar rant on this subject

Love it!)

HA!

Now I have something to which I can refer people who challenge and/or mock me for saying “I couldn’t care less”. I will continue to say it this way because a) I’m still British, damnit and b) it’s correct, whereas the North American way really doesn’t make any sense (sorry).

A plague of dead parrots on people who carelessly say “I could care less” when they don’t care at all!

—————

*I say UK just because I’m not 100% sure which version is used in Australia, New Zealand, or Ireland, although I suspect they all say “I couldn’t care less”. 

Posted in English language, plagues, videos | 24 Comments

Budget oasis

Biology is messy; grant applications even more so.

There are so many intangibles: is the scope too big, too small, or just the right mix of feasible and ambitious? How’s the balance between hot topic sexy science and safe reliable techniques? Have we adequately addressed the specific aims of this RFA? How much preliminary data do we need? Should we include two fall-back alternatives to the shiny new technique we’re planning to use, or will one be enough? Should Dr. X be a co-applicant, or just a collaborator? Who’s on which review panels this year? Is the wording of the hypothesis the very best it could possibly be?

It goes on and on, and you can never really be sure you’ve got it right; there’s always more second-guessing and tweaking that can be done. And of course it’s not just a matter of learning “the rules” of a single agency, like the NIH or NSF: the Canadian research funding ecosystem teems with an incredible biodiversity, a tangled bank of government, charity, and private funding sources, with even the federal health research dollars being split between multiple funding agencies.

During my first few rounds of grant wrangling, I found budget development to be the most confusing part of my new job (I even wrote a limerick about it!) However, I’ve since come to view budget wrangling very differently, and in fact it’s now my favourite part of the whole process.

A couple of years worth of experience and the resulting increase in confidence are a large part of the reason. I’ve worked on so many grants by now that if a PI wants to do some next-gen sequencing or build a tissue microarray or whatever, I can usually find an older grant that used the same methods and use its budget as the starting point for the new one. I’ve also learned who to go to for help with statements of work & service quotes, salary grades & benefits rates, and equipment quotes.

However, I’ve also learned that the true joy of budget development lies in its focus on those lovely tangible, quantitative things:

numbers.

Thank the flying spaghetti monster for numbers! They can only ever add up one way, and there’s always a definite right answer. The maximum amounts you can request for salaries, trainee stipends and equipmentare listed in the competition guidelines, and the grand total is always either over or under the stated limit. No quibbling, no second-guessing: if it’s wrong, you fix it, and if it’s right, you move on with a great sense of satisfaction.

I remember feeling the same way about maths lessons in high school; they were an oasis of certainty and logic amidst the hustle and bustle and messiness of history, English literature, music, French, and yes, biology*. None of this “which of these conflicting sources is the most reliable?”, “what analogies does this poem draw on?”, “how did this composer use changes in instrumentation to evoke different feelings in the second movement of this symphony?”, “j‘ai mangé but je suis allé”, or “how might an increase in the numbers of a given species affect the population dynamics of its prey and its predators over time?”. No, in maths lessons 2+2 was always 4, and when you’d solved an equation you got to write “QED” next to the obviously correct answer and feel extremely pleased with yourself.

Of course, grant budgets aren’t quite this simple; there are always some messy intangibles involved. This agency has never once awarded a PI more in a given year than 85% of the stated maximim annual limit; that agency doesn’t like chunky budgets, so be sure to spread your most expensive activities over the whole term of the project to make it look more even; the other agency always trims the budget by 8-10%, so put some cannon fodder in there**.

But overall, sitting down with a cup of tea to play with numbers in an Excel spreadsheet, rather than with pages and pages of messy words, still gives me the same joy as a high school maths lesson. Just as I did way back then, I do enjoy the messiness, too, but it’s nice to have a break from time to time.

To use a different part of my brain.

To get a right-or-wrong answer.

Writing “QED”? Well, that’s up to the PIs… but I’ll be happy to write the progress report and edit the papers!

—————-
*with the exception of genetics; I think there’s a reason why the logic of Mendelian inheritance, with its nice neat phenotype ratios, appealed to me so much when my biology teacher first introduced it to us!

**as with the other grant wrangling Dark Arts, none of this stuff is ever written down – you have to learn it by asking experienced PIs, especially those who’ve served on review committees, and from your own experiences (I re-read old grant reviews before each new round of applications to the same agency).

Posted in career, education, grant wrangling | 2 Comments

Friday Wednesday Quiz-ology

Yes folks, it’s time for another fun quiz from my puzzle-a-day desk calendar!
 
I was going to save this for Friday, but I just submitted a grant after much stress and panic and lost sleep,* so I could do with a little light relief, even as I get stuck in to the next big project.

This time the actual puzzle on the calendar was to match the -ology to the subject under study. I got all 21 right (using a process of elimination in a few cases), so the quiz is clearly too easy in this original form. Because all my readers are also highly intelligent people (with excellent taste), I’m therefore going to just ask you to define every -ology, without giving you the matching list of subjects to choose from. (It should still be easy, as some of my readers ARE some of these kinds of -ologist).

As before, answer in the comments in any order you like – but please submit only one answer per person per hour, to give as many people as possible a chance to play!  

(AND NO GOOGLING!)

I’ll update the post with the answers and bragging rights as and when I get time, and I’ll add clues if there are any unanswered questions after a day or two.

  1. Agrology- Soil, as it relates to the growing of crops (Chall) – partial credit for Thomas Joseph, Antipodean, & Nat Blair
  2. Campanology – Bells (Stephen Curry)
  3. Cetology – Whales (Nat Blair)
  4. Cytology – Cells (ScientistMother)
  5. Dactylology – Sign language (Pika) – partial credit for Nico, Antipodean,
  6. Dendrology – Trees (Chall)
  7. Etiology – Causes / origins (Biochem Belle)
  8. Geomorphology – Tectonics / landforms (Scott) – partial credit (kinda) for Ruchi
  9. Lithology – Rocks / stones (Nat Blair)
  10. Meteorology – Weather (Biochem Belle)
  11. Metrology – Measurement (Schlupp)
  12. Mycology – Fungi (Ricardipus)
  13. Myology – Muscles (Nico (first to answer correctly) and Thomas Joseph (second, presumably independently!))
  14. Oology – Eggs (Nat Blair)
  15. Pomology – Fruit (Chall) – partial credit for Knutty Knitter
  16. Rhinology – Noses (Nat Blair)
  17. Selenology – Moon (Alyssa)
  18. Semiology – Signs (Lisbeth (first to answer correctly) and Pika (second, presumably independently!))
  19. Speleology – Caves (Chall) – partial credit for Ruchi
  20. Vexillology
  21. Vulcanology – Volcanoes (Erika Cule)

The person with the most correct answers at the end of the quiz will be declared Ologyologist in Chief.

—————-
*the Adobe Acrobat issues I blogged about in my last post turned out to be the least of my problems yesterday. The networked drive, which the IT guys tell every new hire to save all their files to because it gets backed up every hour and has all kinds of redundancies built in and has never, ever, failed even once in the 6.5 (non-contiguous) years I’ve worked here, went down with all the grant files on it at about 3pm yesterday. Oh, and the head of IT is on vacation. It came back up at 5:30, and I only lost about 25 minutes worth of edits made since the last back-up, but there was much wailing and gnashing of teeth. Oh, and the actual proposal had to be pasted into a text box on the online submission form, FFS, and wouldn’t recognise the line breaks from the Word document until I double spaced them all and then deleted the extra spaces. I worked 12 hour days on Monday and Tuesday, and had to come in super early today to walk the Dean through the sign-off and submission procedure. But it is DONE!

After my experiences in my last job, though, I have to say that I much prefer to get stressed about things I actually care about, rather than product inserts and email campaigns. This is some seriously cool stuff, both scientifically and because it has the potential to significantly increase the speed and efficiency of the cancer drug development process. If I had to choose just one of the grants we’ve submitted this year to get funded I’d pick this one for sure, even though some of the other pending grants are for much more money. (Just don’t tell the department’s accountant I said that!)

Oh and yes, I do intend to drink some beers at Mr E Man’s birthday dinner tonight!

Posted in career, competition, English language, grant wrangling, nature, science, silliness, technology | 91 Comments

Adobe: Acrobat, eh?

You must be very bendy.

Perhaps you could go fuck yourself?

Yup, grant crankiness time. As part of the current grant application, I need to assemble details of every grant currently held and applied for by all eight of the PIs – title, dates, source, amount, PI and co-applicants, % effort for all investigators, goals, and % overlap with the current proposal. There are a grand total of 53 grants – oh the joys of working with bigshots! I then need to assemble this list into a PDF which is also to include the abstract of every grant, in the same order as in the list of grant details.

Combining the 54 PDFs is a real barrel of laughs. My computer is old and grumpy at the best of times, and doesn’t take too kindly to opening multiple files. Plus of course Acrobat only lets you open a certain number of files at once. So I have to batch them.

Now, being an organised sort of person, I give all my files and folders very logical names. Wouldn’t you think that Acrobat would recognise this logic and list my files in the right order?

Well, you’d think wrong. Every time I start to combine a batch of PDFs, I get a list of open files that looks something like this:

and have to manually drag the files into the right order.

I really could do without this kind of thing.

Posted in grant wrangling, rants, technology | 15 Comments

Busy busy busy…

…working on an extremely cool grant, due Wednesday. I want this one to get funded soooo badly – the science is so cool and the potential impact so great. I wish I could blog about it!

Anyway, until I’m free again, here’s an interesting link from Genome Biology. As a twist on the annual Beloit College Mindset List1, the author pondered:

what would the scientific worldview be like for someone, let’s say, just starting graduate school today (and therefore about 22 years of age)? Born in 1988, how would their scientific lives differ from the lives of the generations preceding them (including mine, which is the only one I really care about)? It makes for some interesting speculation:

there follows a list of techniques that have always been outdated (or routine) in these students’ lifetimes. Some examples:

• In their lifetime, no one has ever pipetted anything by mouth.

• Believe it or not, they have never known a world without cDNA microarrays.
Worth reading despite the feelings of advanced age that will inevitably follow. As Beth said on Twitter,That makes me feel old. In MY day, we had to look at DNA one gene at a time! Uphill both ways in the snow!”

——————–

1. which “provides a look at the cultural background of the students entering college that fall. The creation of Beloit’s Keefer Professor of the Humanities Tom McBride and former Public Affairs Director Ron Nief, it was originally created as a reminder to the Beloit faculty to be aware of dated references. As the website notes, ‘it quickly became a catalog of the rapidly changing worldview of each new generation.'”

Posted in grant wrangling, science | 5 Comments

RFA ROFL

Oops:

A subsequent email read “Apologies for the previous message which was sent out due to a technical error”.

I love this kind of thing!

Posted in grant wrangling, silliness, technology | 7 Comments

Destination: Sound!

It always seems to take me a while to write blog posts about my favourite trips, probably because I’m in denial about them being over. So the fact that it’s taken me almost a month to start writing this post is a good indication that it was an amazing adventure in my new favourite kayaking destination!

The start of the trip was an almost exact replica of our last one – drive, ferry, drive, stay at mother-in-law’s, drive, ferry, drive, buy food and other supplies*, drive – but instead of continuing up the road to Lund, we turned right and headed for the kayak rental company’s other location, in Okeover Inlet. As before, we’d booked a beast of a double kayak with a central hatch for all our gear, but got loaded up and in the water in record time. In fact we beat the couple next to us, who’d started loading a good half an hour before we did!

Come on you blues!

There was much friendly banter between us as we raced to launch… and again as we crossed their path on a brief trip back to the beach to retrieve Mr E Man’s hat… and yet again as we passed them on our way back up the inlet, heading for Desolation Sound proper.

 Approximate routes

This part of the trip was pleasant enough, with nice cabins dotted about on the wooded slopes of the low-lying hills. As usual after a long land-locked spell, it was bliss just to be back out on the water, feeling the rhythm of the paddle strokes and enjoying the sights, sounds and smells of the ocean. The cabins became more widely dispersed as we passed from Okeover into Malaspina Inlet, but I was beginning to be ever so slightly disappointed in the low-lying hills, the signs of habitation, and the lack of any wildlife.

All this changed, however, when we turned right into Desolation Sound itself. There was some chop and some rebound waves to cope with as we rounded the point, but we’ve been through much, much worse before, and our heavily loaded double kayak wasn’t going to flip unless we wanted it to**. But even as we zig-zagged around to make sure none of the many waves and boat wakes hit us broadside, we were already starting to admire the snow-capped mountains at either end of the Sound, and seeing an abundance of seals and eagles.

Calmer water = photo time!
We found an island to camp on for the night, and apologised to the couple on the beach for disturbing their solitude. They very kindly helped us to carry the kayak up the sloping, stony beach to above the high tide line – even when empty it was a struggle for me to lift my end – and we had a nice chat with them before staking out our campsite, a short walk through the woods away. They’d recently retired and had driven an RV over from Alberta with two kayaks strapped to the roof, and were spending the whole summer on the BC coast, interspersing week-long kayak trips with more luxurious RV camping in various locations. I immediately started formulating “get rich quick and retire immediately” plans in my head (still working on it. I’ll let you know if I make any progress. Or maybe I’ll just buy an RV and some kayaks and bugger off and you won’t ever hear from me again).
We got the tent up and went for a swim. Unlike on Savary and the Copelands (our last new favourite kayaking destinations), which as you can see from the map are very close to Desolation Sound but in a less sheltered piece of water, the water was gorgeous; cool enough to be refreshing, but warm enough to swim in for extended periods of time. And it was clear, and surprisingly fresh, for ocean water. There must be some massive rivers and/or glaciers feeding into the Sound somewhere, because the water didn’t taste all that salty, and even after swimming multiple times a day for five days in a row, we didn’t get that icky crusty salty feeling on our skin or hair.
We had a yummy gourmet hot-dog dinner, and settled in for the night as soon as it got dark. We could hear people in the cabins on the mainland shore, and on the many boats moored in the channel between our island and the mainland, but they all quietened down within an hour and I had a surprisingly good night’s sleep, for a camping trip.
On our second day we re-loaded the kayak, said goodbye to our Albertan neighbours, and headed for our main destination. We’d heard that the Curme Islands were gorgeous, but “overrun with kayakers in the summer”, according to one source. However, having started our trip on a Friday, rather than a Saturday, we thought we might have a head start on the BC Day long weekend traffic.
And so it proved to be! We saw one or two other kayakers on our crossing on calm waters over to the privately owned Mink Island, but they were mostly day trippers from boats and cabins. We were the first paddlers to reach the Curme group, and had a choice of several islands. We chose the one with the outhouse, and bagged the best of the three main tent sites: close to the landing beach (although we had to lift the boat up several levels of rock steps to get it above the high tide line, which took ages due to my wussy little girl muscles), with a dining room set made of driftwood logs, and with rocks behind us from which to fish, jump into the ocean, or watch the sunset. 
After we got the tent up we explored our new home, and declared it to be the best campsite either of us had ever seen. The terrain was similar to that of the Copeland Islands, but with much sparser tree coverage and hence better views in all directions. At one point Mr E Man stuck the camera in my face without warning and said “do a video for your blog where you walk people through the island as if it’s our new summer home”. So here it is! (Sorry about the low volume – this was our regular camera rather than our actual video camera, and we forgot that the mic isn’t as good).

As well as the American Canadian bald eagles, we saw oyster catchers, gulls, vultures, humming birds, squirrels, mice, and dozens and dozens of seals.

And here are some views from the other side of the island (spoiled only slightly by some water on the lens):

I swear I don’t work for Tourism BC, I just really really like it here

We kept expecting more kayakers to show up, but luckily when a group did come they chose another island, and we had ours completely to ourselves all day and all night. We cooked another yummy dinner, and settled in on the West-facing rock behind our campsite to watch the gorgeous sunset.

Yes, I wear socks with my beloved Keens in the evenings when I’m camping (because of the mosquitoes). So sue me.


Smoke from distant forest fires makes for spectacular sunsets

Sun down = bed time!

After another surprisingly decent night’s sleep we got out of the tent early the next morning to find another beautiful day waiting for us, and jumped straight off a rock and into the ocean to celebrate. This was the only time on the whole trip I ever felt cold. After a brief swim and some breakfast, we hauled the kayak back down onto the beach in a series of painful steps (the low tides were all at really inconvenient times on this trip!), and set off on a day trip to Tenedos Bay. It was another gorgeous paddle, followed by a short walk through the woods to Unwin Lake for a freshwater swim. Unfortunately we had to clamber over a bunch of floating and semi-floating driftwood logs to get to the water… like that bit in Insomnia this is the kind of thing I have nightmares about, and I fell off once into some shallow water and got covered in stinking black mud (and scraped my leg in the process), so I wasn’t exactly happy. The lake was nice though,

It turns out that it’s really difficult to take self-portraits while treading water

and we met the couple we’d raced against to load and launch on day one. They were looking for a new campsite after being a little disappointed in how crowded their first two had been, so we told them how great our island was, and they promised to check it out.

After a couple of hours of enjoying the really very pleasant lake, Mr E Man said what I’d been thinking: “this is nice, but it’s not as nice as our campsite. I love our campsite. It’s awesome”. So we agreed to head back to base to see who had invaded our island while we’d been gone. The couple we’d talked to had, as had one other couple and another group of four much younger kayakers, but we were still nicely spread out and everyone had their own space and privacy.

Our new friends from the loading beach and the lake were surviving on freeze-dried food, whereas we had an overabundance of real food, so we shared our pasta dinner with them in exchange for some additional wine. After dinner the other couple joined the four of us on the sunset rock with yet more wine (the group of four younger paddlers kept to themselves), and we all proceeded to spend an extremely lovely evening chatting and getting pleasantly drunk together as the sun went down (and for a few hours afterwards too).

After a not so good night’s sleep (too much wine), our drinking partners all left for home or for pastures new. Mr E Man and I had a swim and then a discussion over breakfast, and decided that we really weren’t going to find anywhere better than where we already were (based on our own observations and on tales from our new friends), and that lifting the kayak up and down all the rocky ledges was going to be more trouble than it was worth. So we celebrated BC Day by spending a lazy day at camp: swimming, playing cards, swimming, playing Scrabble, swimming, reading, swimming, eating, and swimming. It was bliss, and we felt no guilt at all about our “enjoy the destination” mode of ocean kayaking***.

Improving our “taking self portraits while treading water” technique slightly.

Some new kayakers showed up, and we pointed out the best campsites and chatted briefly, but they seemed inclined to keep to themselves, as did the younger paddlers when they returned from their day trip. But yet again we had a fabulous evening chatting and snuggling and watching the sunset and drinking the last of the wine.

That night I crawled into the tent to sleep, little suspecting the horrors that awaited me. The first three nights had been fine, with little more than the sound of the waves to disturb my sleep, so I’d been lulled into a false sense of security. This made it all the worse when I was awoken at about 2:45 am by The Noise.

It  was a kind of combination barking/snorting/coughing/teeth chomping noise. Definitely an animal. A big animal. A big, loud, scary animal. The Noise started on one side of the tent, then moved to the other.

Unbelievably, Mr E Man was still asleep at this point. But not for long, because I switched on the flashlight that hangs from the ceiling of our tent and started shaking him and frantically whispering “DO YOU HEAR THAT???!!! I THINK THERE’S A BEAR!!!!!!”

As a born and bred Canadian, Mr E Man does not share my terror of bears. I keep trying to explain to him that to Europeans, big scary animals with huge teeth that live in the woods and make scary noises are the domain of fairy tales, things that frighten and thrill you when you’re a kid, but aren’t supposed to be real. So when we do something ridiculously foolhardy like move to Canada, we freak the hell out as our childhood nightmares come to life.

Or something.

Anyway, Mr E Man initially seemed freaked out by the noise too, but then calmly tried to talk me out of my own fear by saying “it’s probably a seal. Maybe a sea lion. It’s low tide, right? It’s probably eating those oysters and clams we saw on the beach when we arrived at low tide”.

Yeah, nice try dude. Bears swim and eat shellfish too – our new friends had met someone who’d had a bear wander through his nearby island campsite the day before, also at low tide – and anyway I’ve heard seals and sea lions, and they just don’t make that kind of noise. Or move that fast, on land (The Noise was moving. A lot).

At this point Mr E Man realised that I was too scared to be talked down, so he decided to get out of the tent to see what was happening. Bear spray in one hand and air horn in the other, he peered bravely out into the darkness, but couldn’t see anything. A new and slightly different (chompier) occurrence of The Noise, closer this time, persuaded him that he really didn’t want to startle or otherwise disturb the maker of The Noise, so he slipped discretely back into the tent. Luckily The Noise soon started to gradually move a little further away, and after a couple of hours of listening intently into the night while sitting up facing the door of the tent, gripping the can of bear spray with white knuckles, I relaxed enough to fall back asleep (Mr E Man had been snoring away within a few minutes of getting back into the tent).

I left the light on, though.

I’d had maybe 20 minutes of sleep when The Noise came back, closer than ever. It was now 5:45 and starting to get light, but it was still too dark for courage. I shook poor Mr E Man awake again, and he declared that he absolutely had to know what it was, and picked up the air horn and bear spray again. I begged him not to go outside – The Noise sounded different, more aggressive somehow, than it had earlier – and he reluctantly relented. After another half hour or so The Noise was gone for good, taking my capacity for sleep along with it.

Of course, as soon as it was properly light and I was brave (or at least slightly braver) again, I regretted not finding out what had been making The Noise. We looked everywhere for prints or scat, but none were to be found on the rocks or scrubby grass and parched, hard crust of soil. Our bag of food, hanging on the end of a rope slung over a tree branch that we’d thought was probably too low, was undisturbed. Our neighbours had all heard The Noise, too, and everyone thought it was a bear. Even Mr E Man says that the more he thinks about it, the more he agrees that it couldn’t have been a seal or sea lion. (Our neighbours had met someone who’d claimed to have seen a couple of wolves a few kilometres away the week before, but that’s just silly).

Anyway, the thought of The Noise made me feel slightly better about having to leave our idyllic island campsite and head home. We had one last swim before hauling the kayak back down to the beach, packing up, and retracing our route from the first two days, back along the Sound, round the point, and into the Malaspina and Okeover Inlets. It was another nice paddle, although after the splendour of the last few days, the last hour’s scenery seemed rather tame and pedestrian in comparison.

Overall it was an amazing trip and I got out of the kayak at the end covered in bruises, bug bites, sun burn, blisters, cuts and scrapes, but with a grin as wide as the Sound itself. Great weather, spectacular scenery, gorgeous campsites, great people, good times. Yes there are scary noises in the dark, but hey, now that I’ve had a bear in my campsite at night (one of my worst nightmares) and survived unscathed, maybe I’ll be a bit braver in future.

A very little bit.

Maybe.

My fear of clambering over floating driftwood logs remains intact, but I’m not going to let that get in the way of more kayaking trips, either.

—————–

*shopping while hungry caused a serious kayak hatch overload problem. We ate a ton of food, gave some away, and still brought a whole bunch back. Maybe next time Mr E Man will take my “let’s plan meals in advance and make a shopping list” idea more seriously.

**having said that, I feel more vulnerable in the front of a double than I do in a single or in the back of a double. It’s all about having control of your own rudder – without that control over my direction I get a bit nervous in choppy water!

 ***in the past, we’ve gone kayaking with people whose idea of a good trip is to cover as much distance as they possibly can each day. To each their own… but what we like most about kayaking is the access you get to beautiful, isolated camping spots. So we try to enjoy them as much as we can once we get there. Also, we’re a wee bit lazy.

Posted in camping, Canada, drunkenness, food glorious food, kayaking, nature, photos, travel, videos | 16 Comments