I’d like to teach the world to blog

Well, the big autumn grant deadline cluster is finally behind me. Thank goodness for that. Now I can get to the rest of my to-do list: it’s four days until a big meeting with some international collaborators, eight days until a progress report for another grant is due, and a mere 23 days until the onerous task of lying on a Cuban beach drinking a mojito.
One of the other things I’m working on is my department’s new website. It’s very much a work in progress – we only just got permission to set up this WordPress-based site a few weeks ago (after struggling with the rigid page formats and ridiculously clunky back-end of the official website for several years), and I’ve been scrambling to create content in between all the grant application work I’ve been doing.
It has been surprisingly difficult to persuade the department’s students and postdocs to provide me with text and photos for their profile pages; I anticipate much hurried page creation when they finally decide they need an online presence to facilitate their future job searches. But trying to get people to contribute to the blog? It’s like pulling teeth.
I’ve circulated the Nature Methods editorial encouraging scientists to blog. I’ve suggested general themes and topics for posts, and loose guidelines related to blogging your own or others’ unpublished data. I’ve provided links to Nature Network and ScienceBlogs. My boss is keen and supportive. But I still don’t have a single solid response to my request for blog post ideas, although a couple of people have expressed general interest, and have contributed to other pages on the site (thanks, Darren!). In fact, I’ve resorted to asking individuals to write posts on topics that I’ve thought of… and I still don’t have any posts to show for it.
I never manage to make it to any of those science blogging conferences; they’re always too far away, and thus too expensive and time consuming to get to. But I know a lot of NNers have been to one or more of these conferences, and have attended sessions on how to encourage scientists to blog. I’d really appreciate any ideas you encountered at said events, or just in general!
p.s. yes, I know everyone’s busy. But writing a blog post takes no longer than going for a coffee or extended lunch.

Posted in Uncategorized | 29 Comments

I’d like to thank the International Academy

I’m coming up to the second anniversary of my return to academia, and I’m still loving it. I like to say that I learned a lot from my time in industry, the most important lesson being that industry doesn’t suit me – I’m an academic at heart, and I love being around and getting to write about some incredibly exciting science* (without having to actually do any of it myself).

One of my favourite things about academia is its international nature. I’ve been lucky enough to be part of three very multinational labs, and have shared bench and office space with people from all over the world.

Anonymous Cath has visited worked with people from 13% of the countries in the world!


(This map represents the nationalities of my immediate current and former academic colleagues only – adding in friends from other labs and departments would fill in most of the rest of Europe).

This work environment has benefited me personally – I’ve tried food and drinks I never would have come across without an introduction from my colleagues, I’ve learned (and forgotten) snippets of lots of different languages, I’ve discussed Iranian and Russian and Israeli and Indian politics with natives of those countries, I’ve heard some hilarious Greek jokes and Russian toasts, and the world cup and other international sporting events are always a hoot. Mr E Man and his friends appreciate it, too – they’ve all known each other since high school**, and love hanging out with my more diverse set of friends from time to time.

I believe that the multinational approach to research has also benefited my supervisors, if their publication records are any guide. Their international trainees have done and are still doing some truly world-class research, and every department I’ve worked in has had a very warm and welcoming atmosphere. I’m not usually one to blow my own trumpet so overtly, but my former PI asked me to check the reference she wrote as part of my Permanent Residence application, and she specifically stated that after hiring me, she was pro-actively trying to recruit other British postdocs – and she has in fact hired two more since then.

So it bugs me when I read blog posts like the recent email conversation between DrugMonkey and PhysioProf that imply it’s only worth hiring US postdocs. Although this isn’t the first time I’ve heard this kind of thing from PhysioProf, it’s a little unfair to single him out when this attitude is so wide-spread, both in the blogosphere and (from my own experiences, and inferring from the statement in that post that “In my field, newly-minted PhDs from US universities have their pick of good post-docs”) in real life, too.

Yes, US science is fantastic, widely regarded as the best in the world. Yes, that’s why so many foreign researchers seek to undertake part or all of their training there. Yes, that’s (probably) why so few US trainees spend time in foreign labs. (And yes, the scientific blogosphere is overwhelmingly American – both its authorship and its readership – and yes, it’s completely natural for that (dare I say) bias to spill over into its content and discussions).

But you know what? The rest of the world is also doing some fantastic science. I know that it’s possible to cherry-pick statistics, but the fact that the UK has the best ratio of citations to public spending is no small matter. And it’s just my own national bias in reading material bringing that particular example to the forefront of my mind at this time – great science (and great scientific training) is being done all over the world.

Sure, it’s easier to judge the calibre of a serious applicant*** to your lab when you already know the reputation of their institute and (probably, for post-doc applicants) their supervisor. But is it really so difficult to determine the quality of a foreign institution? A ten-second Google search just now brought up the Google College Rankings site – “an independent project to rank colleges and universities worldwide” – among many other similar sites. Or ask one of your colleagues who comes from that country. And shouldn’t an applicant’s publication record speak for itself? A phone interview would also be revealing, surely.

The comment thread on the DrugMonkey Blog post I linked to has started to address this issue. Obviously not every PI will seek to exclude foreign trainees, and some may even prefer them. But I feel that PIs who don’t consider non-US applicants are missing out.

I know their other trainees are.

——————

*My boss’s paper was the cover story and image in last week’s Nature – how cool is that??!!

**If you’re lucky enough to be born and/or raised here, there’s really no reason to ever leave.


***I say serious applicant because I’m aware of the phenomenon of generic spammy emails sent to every PI possible. I mean, I get them myself, and I’m nowhere near being a PI.

Posted in career, rants, science | 26 Comments

Hockey Pool, Week 2

Only one day late…

ScientistMother joined us one week into the competition, but is making up ground very quickly! How will all the injuries the Canucks sustained on Sunday affect the pool? Stay tuned and find out!
Posted in hockey pool 2009-2010 | 12 Comments

"Marriage is gay"

Just a quickie: this week is going to be crazy busy with grant and progress report deadlines galore. But I just wanted to send a belated “Happy Thanksgiving!” to my Canadian readers!

We spent the long weekend at my mother-in-law’s, which is always well worth the two ferry (i.e. four hour) wait on the way home. The turkey dinner was the best evah, and brother-in-law #1’s Hilarious New Fiance silenced all the doubters with her whipped yam-ginger-orange juice concoction.

HNF and I also upheld our tradition of swapping new music and podcast tips. My iPhone is currently chockablock with Spanish lesson podcasts (we listen to them in the car – our vacation is less than four weeks away!), so I was reluctant to add any more casts to my list… but as usual, she had some awesome new ones that I couldn’t resist subscribing to. Here’s my favourite episode (so far) from my favourite new podcast, “That’s Gay”. Enjoy! I’ll see you on the flipside…

Posted in family, food glorious food, politics, videos | 1 Comment

Nature Network Blogger in Frightful Frankenstein Felines Furore

beast small
Um… Bob?
What have you been up to?
You told us you adopted The Beast from an Australian postdoc. Now, tell the truth: are you actually planning to invade Germany with an army of undead cats?
I didn’t realise how prophetic Brian’s poem was…
(explanation after the jump)

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

Friday silliness

I have a new joke!

I’ve had my hair cut very short before, and when I started to grow it again, I never quite got tired of repeating the same line:

Friend: “So how long are you going to grow it?”

Me: “Six months ought to do it”

And now I have a new one!

Me: “I just got a tattoo”

Friend: “Ooh! Where?!”

Me: “Burnaby

I’ve used it twice so far, and plan to use it as many times as I can get away with.

I have a new song!

I let the thin cat in,
I let the fat cat out,
In, Out, In, Shake the bag of treats about,
I scoop the kitty litter and I sweep up lots of fur,
That’s what it’s all about.
Whoa, shitty kitty ditty,
Whoa, shitty kitty ditty,

Whoa, shitty kitty ditty,
Head bump, Chin rub, Rah Rah Rah

I amuse myself. It’s just as well, really.

Posted in furry friends, silliness | 4 Comments

I can has brain back?

I have clearly spent far too much time looking at LOLcats.
In trying to clear a massive backlog of New Scientist magazines from my house, I was reading a little too quickly yesterday when I reached this snippet at the end of a page:
PA060006
At first reading, I thought the headline was a question from a pilot uncertain about his/her future career prospects.

Posted in Uncategorized | 18 Comments

Ink

I’ve wanted a tattoo for, ooh, about ten years.
Not just any old tattoo, though – one that means something to me, that commemorates a specific event.
Initially, I decided that I’d get one when I got my PhD. But then, what with the rush to make corrections, get the thesis bound, sort out my Canadian work permit, move to a new country, get set up in a new lab, find a place to live, get a bank account, make friends, etc etc etc, it was suddenly a whole year since my viva, and it was no longer a current event.
Plus, although I didn’t know anyone in the UK who’d got a double helix tattoo upon finishing their PhD, it turned out to be quite common in Canada. And I wanted something unique.
A couple of years later, as I applied for Canadian permanent residence, a new idea started to form in my mind. I knew I’d be shooting for citizenship as soon as I was eligible, so why not get a tattoo to commemorate that? The bringing together of two cultures – that’s meaningful enough for me!
Given my family’s Irish and Scottish roots, and my memories of the very happy few years I spent in Glasgow, I decided that I wanted a design that incorporated Celtic design into a Canadian maple leaf. I Googled all kinds of combinations of those words, but never found anything. So it would be both meaningful and unique!
The problem with unique was that I would have to find someone to design the tattoo for me. My initial attempts to sketch a Celtic style outline for the leaf looked Celtic enough, but not even the most patriotic Canadian in the world would have recognised the key component of their national flag in my work. And placing a regular maple leaf inside a Celtic circle looked cool, but from a distance, too much like the Air Canada logo.
“I’ll do it”, said Mr E Man
“Erm… OK…?” I said. I figured I’d let him take a shot at it, and at least use it as the basis for the final design.
But look what he came up with!

Mr E Man’s initial sketch:

I absolutely loved the concept. For some reason I’d never thought to put the Celtic part inside the leaf!
The next step was to find the right tattoo artist. Mr E Man stepped up to the plate again: a work friend’s partner/wife has a very well known and positively reviewed tattoo studio (according to her website, she was “the 1st female artist to own her own Tattoo studio in Canada”, which is pretty damn cool). I called her, sent her Mr E Man’s sketch, and she turned it into this:


Tattoo artist’s interpretation of Mr E Man’s design:


And so, earlier this evening, I headed out from work and went to get my first ever tattoo! I was pretty nervous, but the studio felt more like a nice hair salon than a den of painful torture (although I quickly realised that my normal hair salon level of chatter was not an option – I did not want to break her concentration! Hair grows back…) I was still apprehensive about how much it was going to hurt. The answer (for me) is more than a flu shot, more than a cat scratch, less than a bee sting, less than a bikini wax. Kinda like a sustained wasp sting. It hurt more as she went back to the lines she’d already drawn to strengthen the outline, and I’ll admit to being very happy that I’d decided last week (on purely artistic grounds) to just get the outline, no shading!
 About half-way through

The whole thing took less than an hour, and while it obviously hurt, it really wasn’t as painful as I’d expected.
A shot to give you an idea of size and placement
Hopefully the healing process won’t be too long or too painful! I’ve got my instructions, and plan to follow them to the letter.

 Nice juicy close-up

I’ll get another photo when it’s all healed up and not quite so red!

I am sooooo glad I finally did this.

Posted in art, Canada, personal, photos, UK | 38 Comments

Hockey Pool, Week 1

 Weeks on the X axis, Points on the Y axis.

ScientistMother, what happened to you?! Your name isn’t showing up in the group any more…

Posted in hockey pool 2009-2010 | 8 Comments

Book Reviews: the good science, the bad science, and the ugly

Inspired by Science Bear’s epic book review post, here are three very overdue book reviews of my own!

The Good Science

Dry Store Room No.1: The Secret Life of the Natural History Museum, by Richard Fortey.

I first visited the Natural History Museum in London when I was 16, and it was love at first sight. It’s a beautiful building in its own right, and full of geeky pleasures ranging from stuffed dodos to videos describing chromosomal recombination and meiosis. I’ve since been back several times, to the bafflement of my sister, who lives in London and doesn’t understand how I can spend all day in the museum (and neighbouring science museum – both free! Thanks, Tony Blair!) while she’s at work. (What can I say, I had to see the new Darwin Centre when the first phase opened – I did a tour with a group of other tourists, and when they made us put on lab coats, everyone else giggled and did up all the buttons and took photos of each other, while my own coat flapped open as I walked about hands in pockets, and bugged the tour guides with questions about whether they could extract RNA from the pickled lizards).

It was actually my sister who bought me this book, a behind-the-scenes view of the museum from the resident trilobite man (and now I know how to pronounce trilobites! Bonus!) I was in heaven as I read about the dusty store rooms with their hidden treasures, and the crazy characters who populate the museum’s back rooms. There were times when I felt the book went into too much detail, but overall it was a very enjoyable read. I highly recommend it if you’re a fan of natural history museums in general, and the London version in particular.

8/10

The Bad Science

Bad Science, by Ben Goldacre

This is one of the best, and definitely the most important, of the books I’ve read this year. Everyone should read this book. EVERYONE!

If you’ve read Ben Goldacre’s blog of the same name, you’ll have a good idea of what to expect from the book – a dissection of the dubious science reporting that drives us all crazy. The author’s disdain for the quacks and journalists who spread inaccuracies and outright lies is clear – but the book manages to be funny at the same time!

Well, at least towards the beginning. The early chapters rip apart the more benign incidences of bad science – the detox footbaths and homeopaths of the world. As the book progresses, the targets get larger and more important – think big pharma and the anti-vaccination movement – and the tone understandably gets more serious.

As you might expect from a British author, there is a focus on the British press – for example, the anti-vaccination chapter focuses on the media frenzy around the MMR vaccine, which went largely unnoticed in North America, where people chose to panic about mercury instead. But, as Goldacre says, the fact that there were different frenzies in different countries is yet further evidence for the hollowness of anti-vaccine arguments; if there was any genuine link between vaccines and ill health, you would expect people to claim the same link all over the world. (Apparently in France the worry is that the Hep B vaccine causes MS – but who in the UK or North America has heard of that one?!)

If, like me, you’re already convinced that homeopathy is nothing but overpriced water and that the anti-vaccination movement is intellectually bankrupt, this book obviously won’t change your mind. It’s still well worth a read, though, to help you understand why so many people have been misled by media and quack practices that range from the dishonest to the downright dangerous.

If you know someone who’s not a scientist, and who is on the fence about any of these issues (using homeopathic cold remedies, for example, or (more to the point) trying to decide whether they should get their baby vaccinated), I imagine they would benefit enormously from reading this book. Buy it for them – seriously! The book started quite the conversation when I started reading it at a gathering of my in-laws, several of whom are into homeopathy and associated woo (there was some muttering about the book in the kitchen later, but don’t worry, we’re all still the best of friends!) And I’ve passed it on to a friend who has been subjected to some of the anti-vaccine woo and was starting to be swayed by it.

10/10, VERY highly recommended.

The Ugly

When Will There Be Good News? by Kate Atkinson

I was soooo excited to read this book. It’s the third in the Jackson Brodie trilogy; the first book is one of my all-time favourites, but I found the second a little disappointing. It breaks my heart to have to tell you that the third book continued the trend of declining quality.

True to form, Atkinson’s writing is still wonderful, somehow blending humour with bleak despair,  and with occasional toe-curlingly, grin-at-strangers-on-the-bus moments of linguistic ecstasy. And her characters, old and new, are still amazingly vivid and real – you feel like you know these people.

But.

But, but, but.

Reading the book was like stuffing myself with junk food; pleasurable while it lasted, but ultimately deeply unsatisfying. Atkinson’s trademark weaving together of several story threads felt forced and unnatural. Whereas the previous books brought characters together through asthma attacks or car accidents, When Will There Be Good News? relies on murders, kidnappings, and train crashes. It was just too much.

I can forgive my favourite author one bad book; I’ll buy the next one for sure (although I’ll probably wait for the paperback, rather than pre-ordering the hardback like I did with this one). But if the law of diminishing returns continues, I may have to cut my losses and stop reading before I pollute my feelings about some of my all-time favourite books.

9/10 for the writing, 4/10 for the actual book.

Posted in bad people, book review, communication, medicine, nature, pseudoscience, science, the media | 4 Comments