The Journal of Anthropomorphism

While browsing journal TOCs in my RSS reader earlier today, I realised that I seem to have subconsciously assigned human personalities to some of the journals I read most frequently.

For example:

  • Current Biology is an extrovert who enthusiastically dives into any ongoing topic of conversation, and talks with their hands a lot. Fun at parties;
  • Nucleic Acids Research is an older man in a tweed jacket who quietly talks with great authority about the arcane technical details of his obscure hobby over a cup of Earl Grey;
  • Genome Research is that one friend who always has the most recent smart phone and tablet;
  • Oncogene is an old friend from my grad school days. They don’t seem to have moved on much in the intervening years, and I don’t see them very often, but when I do it’s always nice to catch up and reminisce.

Is this normal, or have I developed a very specific form of synesthesia?

Posted in freakishness, publishing, science, silliness | 49 Comments

Hockey pool, week 2

I have to say, I’m really enjoying the return of the NHL – having games to watch on dark, rainy weeknights makes me very happy!

The pool, however, is not going so well for me. Here are everyone’s points for Week 2:

Screen Shot 2013-02-03 at 11.12.45 AM

It was a great week for Gerty and Lava, while Week 1 leader Sugar Scientist also had a very strong showing, with Raj Blackhawks not far behind. At the other end of the graph, Bam and Gen Repair still don’t seem to have figured out which sport we’re following, not that I can talk with my mighty 11th place weekly finish!

And how did these results affect the overall standings?

Screen Shot 2013-02-03 at 11.29.41 AM

(Sorry about the shitty graph, by the way – I used to make these graphs in Excel while I had lunch at my desk, but in my new job I actually have people to eat lunch with AND the pool weeks end on a weekend rather than a week day. So I have a choice of Google Drive or Numbers, neither of which I know how to use anywhere near as well as Excel. So I can’t figure out how to give similarly coloured lines uniquely shaped data point marks, but at least the legend on the right lists the players in order of their position).

Sugar Scientist retains the top spot, while Lava’s, Gerty’s, and Raj’s strong week 2 picks lifted them up to second, third, and fourth places, respectively. The rest of us are ticking along much as we were – but there’s still plenty of hockey left to play!

Beth is hosting next week – thank you, Beth and Chall, for signing up for hosting duties!

 

Posted in hockey pool | 7 Comments

99% Oblivious

One of the podcasts to which I subscribe is called 99% Invisible – “a tiny radio show about design, architecture & the 99% invisible activity that shapes our world.” Each episode covers an aspect of design that someone outside the industry just wouldn’t usually think about – for example, how architects incorporate acoustic design into large public buildings. The show’s very well made, and believe me, I need all the help I can get in this arena because, as indicated by the title of this post, I really just don’t usually notice this kind of thing.

Case in point: while I was living in Glasgow, my sister came to see me and we decided to visit the famous School of Art, designed by Charles Rennie Mackintosh. Everyone told us that we should definitely take the official tour, led by students at the school; however, we arrived about 45 minutes early and wandered around a bit by ourselves first. The building’s absolutely gorgeous and we thought we were being appropriately observant and appreciative, but apparently we weren’t even close. When the tour started, the guide pointed out the building’s recurring theme, which is symbolic of the growth and maturation of the school’s students as they progress through their education: there are acorn motifs built into many different aspects of the design of the entrance hall, sapling and leaf bud motifs in the corridors, and the gnarled wood of the bannisters in the library represents the roots and branches of mature trees. There were some other features we’d never have noticed by ourselves in a million years, such as the use of light: some of the windows were designed to cast squares of light onto the wall that are the exact shape and size of other built-in features of the room, or that complement the patterns on the floor. It was amazing, and humbling; we hadn’t been thinking about the building’s design at the right level, or even in the right way.

Well, this week I learned that I’ve been similarly oblivious to the less subtle theme behind the design of a building I thought I knew extremely well: the building in which I work. I’ve been in my current job for eight months now and worked in the same building for two and a half years from 2005 to 2007; I went to dozens of meetings there in the intervening years, too. But when my team was treated to the public tour of the building on Monday*, I learned that I’d somehow managed to completely miss the Pacific Northwest theme that graces our hallowed halls.

Now, I had at least spotted these three massive yellow cedar poles, but had not quite grasped their symbolism. They represent the trees of the local forests, rather effin’ obviously now that I think about it!

IMG_3482

The green glass bench, one of many similar features in the building, represents our lovely lakes. I’m less embarrassed about not noticing this – half the city of Vancouver’s made of green glass, so you sort of stop noticing it.

Less obviously, the pattern of tiles on the floor represents a meandering stream or river bed:

IMG_3487

(note more cedar and green glass in the elevators)

The fact that the ceiling of the lobby area is deliberately grey, to represent our often cloudy skies, is something I feel no shame at all in not noticing; the walls of the lobby stretch upwards to the height of two large lab floors, and the ceiling is therefore so far above you when you come in that I’d never even thought to look up.

The one feature that we all felt absolute idiots for not noticing, though, is the mountain motif on the walls of the lobby:

IMG_3486

D’OH! Oh well, at least no-one else noticed this design that’s been staring us in the face every time we enter the building for years, either…

The other cool thing we learned on the tour is that we apparently have a ghost! A poltergeist, to be specific – and one that hates all the glass, symbolic or no. I didn’t know this, but the lovely old house (now a coffee shop) that sits right in front of our very modern-looking green glass building actually used to be where we are now, and was moved over to make way for the new development.

IMG_3412

The story goes that the ghost that lived in the house was extremely unhappy about this turn of events, and took out its wrath on all the glass in its new home. Apparently the long curved glass top of the ground floor reception desk shattered for absolutely no reason one night – there’s CCTV footage of it breaking with no-one anywhere near it and with no seismic activity reported in the area. The architects and engineers were said to be completely baffled. Similarly, it took multiple attempts to finish the lunch room on the fifth floor, because the freshly-installed windows kept shattering and/or popping out of their frames – again, for no reason the architects and engineers could discern.

It’s a cool story, and led to much amusement on the tour. The first couple of times the tour guide asked if there were any questions, the response was “tell us more about the ghost!” or just “MOAR GHOST STORIES!!!!”

Sadly, though, the ghost has always been 100% invisible…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*Some people had never had an official tour, and others had, but a long time ago. It was actually really cool to see the facility the way it’s presented to donors and collaborators – we got a mix of both types of tour – and to learn what kinds of questions both groups ask the Operations Manager, who acts as the guide. Apparently donors mostly ask how much the various machines that go “ping!” cost, and are always flabbergasted at the response!

Posted in art, education, nature, personal, photos, silliness, Vancouver | 10 Comments

Facebook, grammar, and sisterly love

Back in 2010, I wrote a blog post about how although my sister and I took very different career paths, we’ve ended up with similar kinds of job. I am sad to have to report that since then, we have discovered a gaping chasm between us that threatens to destroy this new-found unity…

Oxom1

and then:

OxCom2

Naturally, every birthday and Christmas card I send her for the rest of our lives will be signed “love, hugs, and kisses”, just to piss her off…

Posted in English language, family, screenshots, silliness | 30 Comments

Hockey Pool, week 1

Each scoring week in this year’s pool runs from Saturday to Friday, which I prefer to the usual Monday to Sunday – it’s much easier to find time to update the spreadsheet and post the results over the weekend than on a Monday!

As you can tell, I still haven’t quite optimised my use of Google Documents Drive to make charts…

Screen Shot 2013-01-27 at 3.36.49 PM

…or my hockey picks. The eight points I picked up for Schneider getting a shut-out for the Canucks on Friday night helped a LOT – yay for the Schneids! SSSSCCCCHHHH!

Congrats to Sugar Scientist for taking the first week’s bragging rights! There’s a tight chasing pack though, so watch out…

I’d very much like participants who have blogs of their own to share the updating duties again this year… please let me know if you’re up for it and I’ll email you the link to the Google Drive spreadsheet. I’ll do next week’s, and you can sign up for a week of your choice on the spreadsheet itself.

YAY, HOCKEY IS BACK! LET THE TRASH-TALKING BEGIN!

Posted in hockey pool | 6 Comments

I AM CANADA (and so can you!)

Those of you who share my appreciation of the peak of Western civilisation that is Twitter may have come across a series of accounts that represent a given country, with one citizen of that country taking over the account each week. I believe this trend started in Sweden, where the idea was actually initiated by the government and Stephen Colbert promptly tried to get in on the act as an honorary Swede, or “artificial Swedener”, as he put it*; this week’s curator, Steffan, has been absolutely brilliant, and his ongoing verbal battle with the corresponding (although not government-affiliated) Canadian account drew my attention to the fact that hey, look – Canada has a corresponding (although not government-affiliated) account!**

I applied immediately, of course, and have been selected as the Person of Canada for the week of January 21st-27th! My profile just went up on the website, and I’m just waiting for the account login information to be handed over tonight or tomorrow morning. This is all very exciting, and the timing is perfect – I’m sure that interest in my work is going to be extremely limited even though I’m going to a presentation about a new funding opportunity tomorrow, so I won’t tweet about that unless asked, but I have a really fun week of non-work events planned: I’m going to the Canucks-Flames game on Wednesday; a live story-telling event on Friday; snowshoeing (possibly, depending on friends) on Saturday morning; and a Burns Night supper on Saturday night.

You don’t even need a Twitter account to follow along – although, as with everything else, it’ll be much more fun if you do!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*he was unsuccessful. The title of this post is my official tribute fart in his general direction.

**lots of other countries do, too – check out the #rotationcuration hashtag for the latest shenanigans.

Posted in Canada, current affairs, drunkenness, personal, silliness, snow, sport, technology | 9 Comments

ZOMG HOCKEY POOL!!!

I honestly didn’t think we’d get any NHL hockey this year, but just like that I’m already double booked for the first Canucks game on Saturday and committed to three hockey pools*…

…including this one!

We’re using the CBC pool again, as most people who are interested should already have an account, and unlike other pools it continues into the playoffs. All readers (including lurkers) and Twitter friends welcome! Once you’ve picked your team for the first week, join the group VWXPool (password: 2012Season!) and let me know in the comments, especially if you’re new and you think I won’t recognise your user name (we always get at least one random person joining the pool each year, but I kick them out if two emails asking who they are go unanswered. I guess some people join random pools on the internet with people they don’t know, which seems odd to me, but to each their own I guess).

I think the pool will be smaller than usual this year, as I know there are a few past participants who are so cheesed off with the lock-out and/or the league’s inaction on head injuries that they just don’t want to be involved in NHL hockey in any way, shape or form any more. We’ll miss you guys, but I do understand – I’m seriously cheesed off with the whole situation myself, just not quite enough to override my love of the sport and the IRL & online social scenes that revolve around it.

YAY HOCKEY!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*the three pools are very different. The CBC pool we’re using here involves choosing new players every week, another that my friend is running involves picking one player each from 20 groups and sticking with that line-up for the whole season, and the one we’re doing at work will be my first ever draft-style pool. The draft is on Friday… wish me luck!

Posted in hockey pool, sport | 30 Comments

Lab safety: who’s on the hook?

I’m shamefully behind on my blog reading, and therefore didn’t see Richard’s excellent article on lab safety until the Guardian had already closed comments. I’ll therefore have to relate my story as its own post, instead of the comment I’d originally intended.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Richard’s article references a very sad story that’s rather famous among British scientists:

A fair few years ago now, a certain UK Research Council unit installed oxygen sensors in the room where they kept liquid nitrogen tanks. This is because liquid nitrogen rapidly boils at anything approaching room temperature, and naturally the newly gaseous nitrogen will rapidly displace other gasses—including oxygen. So if you’re working with or decanting liquid nitrogen and an oxygen alarm goes off, you get the hell out of Dodge before you asphyxiate. I’ve been there, done that. But in this particular case, the sensors kept going off, making it next to impossible for these particular people to do their work. So they muted the alarm.

Yes, that was a damn fool thing to do, and when there was a leak somebody asphyxiated and they found his body frozen to the floor. But why the sensor kept going off in that situation is something that H&S should have looked at, and, oh I don’t know, made sure the room was adequately ventilated, perhaps? Maybe even moved the tanks someplace else.

This happened while I was doing my PhD in Glasgow, quite close to the facility in question and in an institute funded by the same organisation. Our lab manager therefore took this development extremely seriously, and we were all asked to think of possible solutions to our own liquid nitrogen problem, which was as follows:

We all took it in turns to fill up our lab’s liquid nitrogen containers, and it was a task that everyone dreaded. The tanks were in a deserted corner of the basement, where you would often hear the skitterings of mice behind storage boxes, but never run into a fellow human being. The room was poorly lit, poorly ventilated, and rather musty (don’t worry, they’ve since knocked the old building down and replaced it with a shiny new purpose-built facility). It took ages to fill up the tanks from the single old hose (which would shriek like a banshee as the nitrogen flowed through it, adding to the creepiness of the situation), and your hands would freeze through the thickest of gloves… not to mention the chill that would seep into your feet and then the rest of your body from the fog of nitrogen vapour. Learning that this activity was potentially fatal as well as deeply unpleasant made us dread our turn on the schedule slightly even more.

The list of suggested remedies was long, technical, and potentially extremely expensive – sensors, lights, alarms, video monitors, new ventilation systems for the whole building, you name it.

Now, there’s an old story that when faced with the problem of normal pens not working in zero gravity, NASA spent years and millions of dollars developing a special pen for astronauts. Meanwhile, Soviet cosmonauts used pencils. This tale has sadly been debunked, but I’m proud to relate that my PhD supervisor is just as ingenious as any mythical Soviet engineer:

“Send people down there in pairs – one to fill the tanks, and the other to watch from the doorway, holding a boat hook to pull them out if they collapse”, he said. “I can provide the boat hook”.

Problem solved! We never needed to use the boat hook, thankfully, but it was nice to know it was there…

Posted in science, technology | 10 Comments

And the winner is…

The results of the Fourth Annual VWXYNot? Readers’ Choice Comment of the Year Award vote are IN!

The winner is…

(insert drumroll here)

…BEAN-MOM!

2012 comment results

Congratulations Bean-Mom – please let me know to which email address you’d like me to send your Amazon gift certificate!

Beth – dude – second place three years in a row! If I see you tonight I’ll buy you a bonus prize in liquid format, because really, that’s almost more impressive than winning!

Many thanks to everyone who voted! Personally I prefer the top three choices approach to the single vote I’ve used in previous years, because I think it approaches a fairer representation; several people have mentioned in the past that it’s really hard to pick just one comment, especially when the options can be so different in type, length, and tone. However, the number of votes was way down (by more than 50%, once I’d disqualified a couple of entries that ignored the “vote for three different comments as your first, second and third choices” rule), so maybe I should revert just to be more inclusive, or maybe move the vote to a less busy time of year. What do you guys think? If anything? 😉

Posted in blog buddies, competition, meta | 14 Comments

VOTE, YOU BASTARDS!

I only have 15 usable votes so far in the 2012 Comment of the Year award, despite the post having had more than 100 unique hits! Please follow the link to remedy this unacceptable situation, if you have not already done so.

As an incentive / thank you, here’s a photo of Grumpy Cat Her Maj on the new $20 bill. My friends and I have had hours minutes of fun imagining what she’s thinking; most captions so far are along the lines of “I know you’re just going to spend this on maple syrup and beer. Or possibly maple beer. Filthy Canadians”

IMG_3338

I had to donate some of these to the local food bank to get over the guilt, judgement and shame I feel every time I spend one of them on something frivolous.

Bonus incentive: the most Vancouvery Christmas song of all time, from local band Said the Whale.

http://youtu.be/-8BOkodfHWo

Happy Holidays, everyone! Now go and VOTE!

Posted in Canada, drunkenness, meta, music, photos, silliness, videos | 5 Comments