Hockey pool, week 22

Well, it was a week where the rich got richer and the poor got poorer…

Lavaland’s 30 points saw her hold on to top spot, but it was The Week Of The Ricardipus, as he picked up an impressive 36 points and made a run for the top. Bob looks safe in third, meanwhile, with a very creditable 28 points for the week.

In the bottom half five-eighths of the table I extended my newly forged lead over fifth-placed ScientistMother by a mighty one point, while Chall beat Gerty by the same margin to reclaim sixth place by the skin of her teeth. Gerty and Thomas shared last place in the weekly standings, and so no ground was made up at the bottom of the overall rankings.

Fellow members of the bottom five: I think we need a revolution, a redistribution of points. What say you?

Posted in hockey pool | 20 Comments

Random sampling and ambush mentoring

The teacher I had when I was seven or eight had a great approach to teaching us our multiplication tables. Sure, we did some rote learning and some whole-class recitals of the tables, but her favourite method was to surprise us with (seemingly) random questions. The class would be in the middle of an English lesson, or making Easter cards, or enjoying quiet reading time, and she’d suddenly bark “[Name]: what’s seven times eight?”, expecting that kid to answer in front of the whole class. It certainly kept us on our toes.

My PhD supervisor enjoyed using similar tactics. You’d be innocently passaging cells in the tissue culture room only to jump out of your skin as he sidled up behind you and suddenly asked you to summarise your principal hypothesis or your most recent results; you’d pop into his office late on a Friday afternoon to show him your latest Western blot, only to get thoroughly grilled for an hour or so about your grasp of the literature and/or proper experimental design. Again, the value of the exercise was well worth the stress of always being on your guard.

One of the PIs I work with has just started doing something similar. In the middle of grilling one student during a lab meeting presentation this week, he suddenly turned to a different student, who wasn’t expecting to have to contribute, and asked them to describe how the large T antigen transforms cells. It took everyone by surprise, especially the student in question, who couldn’t remember the right answer from their undergrad lectures. But I bet everyone’ll be more prepared from now on…

…including me…

I think ambush mentoring is great – even when I don’t know whether I’m a likely target!

Posted in education, science | 19 Comments

Project management: go with the flow

Both grants have been submitted, my desk and email inbox have been tidied, and sanity has been (partially) restored. That was one crazy round of CIHR grant applications, even more so than usual, but – as always – we pulled it together at the last minute.

Now that things are getting back to normal, I’ve resumed a new favourite task – translating grant proposals into flowcharts.

We’re starting a couple of very complicated multi-site studies, and I’ve been finding this exercise enormously helpful. Not only does the process really crystallise the research plan in my mind, it also helps with the creation of tracking spreadsheets which in turn help me keep tabs on progress, identify delays and bottlenecks, and write annual reports.

In this flowchart, each colour represents a sample (or set of samples), and the corresponding coloured arrows map the flow of each sample / set of samples through the various processes and analyses involved in the project. Roman numerals correspond to the five Aims of this sub-project (one of five sub-projects that make up the study as a whole); numbers in parentheses refer to the page of the proposal on which the samples / processes /analyses are described.

This process really appeals to the same logical part of my mind that fell in love with Mendelian genetics. Yes, I know that biology is too messy to be organised into nice neat little boxes, and that the longer-term parts of the plan, in particular, are likely to change as a result. But, as George Box once said, “all models are wrong, but some are useful”; these particular models are immensely useful to me.

The research plan for this project required a different mapping approach. As indicated at the bottom left of the diagram, blue boxes represent various samples / sets of samples; black boxes represent various processes / analyses; and red boxes represent final datasets / results. (NB I used red and green for the arrows at the bottom just to make it clear which samples were being compared in each of the two analyses that involve those four samples – there’s no other significance to those colours). Again, the corresponding Aims and/or proposal page numbers are listed in each box.

As my colleagues emerge from their offices, blinking into the light after the CIHR deadline, and become available for project planning meetings, I’ll soon find out if anyone else agrees… I’ve had really good feedback from a few people on the usefulness of my tracking spreadsheets and team meetings, but it’s been unexpectedly tough to get some other people to update their parts of the spreadsheet and to come to the meetings on a regular basis.

Ah well… the reviews for one of these grants included the phrase “All members of the team are supremely qualified to conduct the research. […] If this team cannot pull off this study, no one in Canada can.” As part of said team – even a backroom, largely invisible part – I feel inspired to rise to that challenge!

Now, pass me my carrot TimBits and stick (TBD – I’m not good with sticks)…

Posted in career, communication, grant wrangling, science, whining | 17 Comments

Gaelic names are always the hardest to pronounce

I’m spending all weekend in the office, working on a couple of grants that are due tomorrow. Being even more in need of sanity breaks (such as this quick blogging break) than usual, I took a nice refreshing walk in the snow yesterday lunchtime to a nearby Safeway. The cashier was new, and unusually chatty as she rang up my sandwich, milk (tea consumption is at an all-time high), fruit smoothie, and chocolate (an essential item). As I handed over my Safeway loyalty card and air miles card, she glanced at the latter and asked, “how do you pronounce your last name?”

“Um, Ennis”, I replied.

She gave me an extremely strange look as she took my cash and handed back my cards.

As I was walking away, putting the cards and change back in my wallet, I noticed that I haven’t yet changed my name on my air miles card. (I’ve been married 3 and a bit years, but hey, some name changes have a higher priority than others).

Now.

Asking someone how you pronounce “Dunn” is a bit weird, no?

However, I have to accept that answering with “Ennis” is even weirder.

I should probably avoid that checkout line for a wee while.

Posted in food glorious food, grant wrangling, personal, silliness | 20 Comments

Soylent’s is Golden

Like many of my friends, I’ve recently become a big fan of Groupon and all the other group buying sites. See a deal -> press a button on my phone -> take the phone to a restaurant -> half-price dinner -> yay!

I’ve signed up to several sites, and the alerts all seem to hit my inbox at around the same time each day. This morning’s offerings included deals for a local restaurant and DJ school…

…and something a little more unusual.

Om nom nom

Organic is good – no wonder this offer has the EthicalDeal seal of approval – but what I want to know is: is this what the free-range kids movement is really all about?

Posted in English language, food glorious food, shopping, silliness | 9 Comments

Normal service will be resumed in March

CIHR grant deadline time is such fun! Especially when half the PIs on the two grants you’re working on are out of the country, in timezones that severely hamper communication, and half of the rest are freaking out because their email server has been down for over 24 hours! The internal signature deadlines add even more fun to the proceedings! Fun like working all day on Sunday (from home, at least) and then staying in the office until 8pm on Monday, turning down offers of free after-work drinks in favour of working on budgets and budget justifications, and sending out increasingly desperate pleas to PIs for feedback and final decisions!

Oh well, at least the unexpected outbreak of sanity regarding the use of scanned rather than original documents that first appeared during the Olympics last year has persisted, and I don’t have to go to campus… 

Here’s some ridiculous packaging I encountered today, to illustrate the sense of frustration I’ve been feeling all week:   

If I had the right tools on hand to cut through the piece of plastic preventing me from removing the scissors from the packaging, I wouldn't have needed to buy scissors, now, would I? SHEESH!

 (also: don’t ever go to an arts and crafts supplies store if you’re in a rush. Go to the drug store that also sells scissors, even if it’s three times as far from your office. At least it won’t be full of lovely happy smiley SLOW people having a lovely happy smiley SLOW time chatting to the lovely happy smiley SLOW cashiers about their lovely happy smiley crafting projects).

Breathe in… breathe out… breathe in… breathe out…

Right, and here are some photos from my lovely happy smiley birthday snowshoeing trip on Saturday, to keep me going until my time becomes my own again after the February 28th submission deadline!   

The sign speaketh the truth

  

 

  

That reminds me, I have a 40th birthday party to plan for September...

  

All this approximately a 30 minute drive away from my sofa! I really must get out there more often – especially on gloriously sunny days with clear views of the mountains, city and ocean, when the beautiful powdery snow is piled up like giant marshmallow pillows but it’s so warm you don’t need to wear your toque or gloves!

(Photos from the subsequent (larger, louder) pub session not shown, to protect the drunk because we were having too much fun talking, eating, drinking, and watching hockey to take any. Also not caught on camera: me tripping over my own feet and faceplanting in the snow TWICE because I forgot I was wearing snowshoes. In my defense, the first time was because I’d just been offered some cheese by someone standing a few steps away and got a wee bit over-excited; the second time was just because I’m an eejit. Oh well, at least I didn’t ask the rentals guy “where should I put my normal shoes?” upon being handed some snowshoes, unlike Mr E Man. Although I probably only escaped this fate because I have my own snowshoes and didn’t need rentals). 

I promise not to drink any more caffeine today.

Posted in 2010 Olympics, career, drunkenness, idiocy, personal, photos, rants, silliness, snow, Vancouver, whining | 12 Comments

More on dating

Places where I used to write the date:

  • On cheques
  • At the top of letters
  • Lesson / lecture notes
  • Lab books
  • Travel journals

Places where I now write type the date:

  • Computer file names

Percentage of times I try to type “date” and it comes out “data”:

  • ~92
Posted in education, science, silliness, technology | 28 Comments

Hockey pool, week 19

I don’t usually display a chart of each person’s weekly points tally, but I’ve decided to include it today because it looked so nice when Ricardipus did it I thought it might make Thomas feel better I KICKED ASS for once!

it's about bloody time I had a good week

It was a good week for us bottom dwellers, with Thomas also doing well. But how did this affect the standings?

Lavaland didn’t have the best of weeks, but second-placed Ricardipus did worse, and failed to make up any ground on her. Bob’s solid effort put him within two points of second place, while ScientistMother did one point better than Bob and made up some of the ground between her and the top three spots.

Chall had the worst week in the pool, and although Gerty-Z placed in the middle of the weekly points rankings, it wasn’t enough to prevent me from leapfrogging both of them into fifth place. Thomas continues to hold last place, but made up good ground on Gerty and Chall in joint sixth place.

The Canucks continue to do well despite defense-men dropping like flies to (IMO) cheap shots from opposing players, I’m beating Mr E Man and his best friend in the other pool I’m in, and all is well in hockey land.

Who wants to host next week?

Posted in hockey pool | 16 Comments

Mal-entines Day

When Mr E Man and I got married, he assumed that now we had an official wedding anniversary, we’d no longer be celebrating the anniversary of when we met. However, when the next January 18th approached, I burst his bubble when I asked where we were going for our celebratory dinner. He’d always had a hard time remembering the date (not me – it’s the same anniversary as being awarded my PhD) and had hoped that he wouldn’t have to any more. I wanted to keep the tradition going, though, and offered him a deal – to celebrate both anniversaries, but skip Valentines Day. He accepted, so our only date tonight is with the sofa, TV, and the Canucks game.

Whatever your plans for tonight – whether you’re out on a date, home on the sofa, or – like my cousin in Ohio – out on a pub crawl with all your single friends, wearing the most hideous bridesmaid dresses your married friends have ever inflicted on you – I hope you’ll enjoy the following tales of Horrible Dates I Have Been On, and add your own to the comments!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1998 – The Monologue

Shortly after moving to Glasgow for my PhD, I joined the grad students’ Research Club – mostly for the cheap food at their bar, but also to meet students from other departments. One such person was a tall, dark, handsome and very confident law student with a sexy Israeli accent. He asked me out, and a couple of days later I found myself walking at his side into a bar where a large group of his law student friends “just happened” to be assembled. After talking to the group for over an hour, we moved to a table for two – and he proceeded to talk non-stop about himself and how great he was. He barely stopped for food and drink, and on the extremely rare occasions when I managed to get a word in edgeways, he turned whatever I said back around to himself. It was painful, but he talked so incessantly that I couldn’t even get the words “well, it’s late, I should be getting home” out between brags.

He called me a couple of days later and asked me out on a second date. I politely said “thanks but no thanks”, but he just wouldn’t let it drop – he just kept saying “how about Tuesday? No? Wednesday? No? Thursday?” I kept getting blunter and ruder, saying “No, I just do not want to go out with you again. Not on Thursday, not on Friday, not ever. I did not enjoy our date”, but he just kept talking and talking and eventually I had to hang up. He called back and left messages several times over the next few days – I was screening my calls at this point, obviously, and had instructed my flatmates to do the same – before he FINALLY got the hint.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1999 – The Asexual*

After the disastrous date with the supremely confident guy, I went the other way for my next date. He was a really nice guy, a total sweetheart (and really cute, too), but very quiet and shy. He was also two or three inches shorter than me, which I admit put me off at first, but I finally got over myself and asked him out.

Our first date seemed to be going well; he’d really come out of his shell and we were chatting away and finding lots of points of common interest. However, literally just after we’d ordered our food, he told me “you know, I’ve never had a girlfriend. And to be honest I’m not really sure that I’d like one. If I did want a girlfriend, I’d definitely want it to be you. But I don’t think I do want a girlfriend”.

The rest of the date was rather awkward. We stayed on good terms, though, and he still came to all our parties.

I don’t think he went on any more dates during his PhD.

(*or something. I don’t know what his deal was. I doubt he did either, at the time. I do hope he figured it out because he was a really nice guy).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2002 – The Old Guy

It’s hard to meet people in Vancouver. At first I thought it was just because it was the first time I’d moved to a new place for a job and found a flat on my own, rather than arriving as a student and being assigned to shared university accommodation. However, lots of newcomers to Vancouver – even students – say the same thing. People are great once you get to know them, but it can be incredibly hard to break into an existing clique. Until I met Mr E Man and got to know his friends, almost all my friends were from work.

Anyway, I’d decided to try telephone dating (internet dating was just getting big, but I didn’t have a computer at home and certainly wasn’t going to do it from work. Not after an unpopular person in the adjacent lab left their profile up on a shared computer and their labmates edited it to say such things as “my main role at work is to be rude and unreasonable and piss off my colleagues”, and then changed the password). I was 25 at the time, so on my recorded profile I said I was looking for a guy in his early 20s up to early 30s.

One of the three or four guys who left messages on my account actually seemed normal, so I called him back and we chatted a few times. He said he was in his early 30s. However, when we finally met (Sunday lunch, at a chain restaurant – his choice. BLAH), he was blatantly AT LEAST ten years older than that. He was pretty good looking, actually, but I had no interest in dating someone almost twice my age, and I think my disappointment must have shown on my face. We had an only semi-awkward conversation at first, but then when I asked him what kind of music he was into he started telling me how he hated all “the typical young person stuff” like live music and going to bars.

Seriously? You lie about your age to score a date with much younger women, and then tell them you don’t like “young person stuff?” Whatever, creepy old guy!

That was the end of my telephone dating experiment.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2002 – The Job Interview

Finally, I met a fun and interesting guy in a “normal” way – at a friend’s Hallowe’en party! I was dressed as Robin Hood (complete with a toy bow and arrow and Smarties** to give away to “the poor”, i.e. cute guys), and he was dressed as a cowboy, but as the evening progressed he ended up with balloons under his shirt like boobs, and put lipstick and eye shadow on too. We had a really fun time – he burst his boobs with a pin after I complained that they were bigger than mine, and everyone laughed, that kind of fun – and I was delighted when he gave me his business card at the end of the night and asked me to call him.

I should have known something was up when he suggested we meet for coffee at 11 am on a Sunday. WTF is up with Vancouver men and Sunday lunchtime dates?! I arrived a minute or two after 11, to find that he’d already bought his own coffee and muffin without waiting for me. (I bought my own, too, and even though I don’t think women should expect the guy to pay, I’m old-fashioned enough to think that men should at least offer). We sat down on the sofa, and I expected that we’d resume our fun conversation full of jokes and talk of movies and music. However, he proceeded to basically interview me for the vacant position of Girlfriend. Seriously – he asked me questions like “where do you see yourself in five and in ten years?”, “how many evenings a week do you anticipate you will be spending on work activities?”, and even, at the end, “is there anything you’d like to ask me?” I was totally flabbergasted – I thought he was joking at first – but no, he really was that boring and pompous! It was a total turnaround from his party persona, which is never a good sign, and the date managed to combine boring and weird in totally new and unwelcome ways. At the end of the date he shook my hand (I’m not making ANY of this stuff up) and said he’d be in touch (SERIOUSLY).

A friend who’d been with me at the Hallowe’en party had been very excited for me for scoring such a fun and interesting date, and she’d asked me to call her as soon as I could to give her all the juicy details. After she’d expressed surprise that I was done already, after only an hour, she asked how it went. I told her that I’d just been interviewed for the job of Girlfriend, and (when she’d stopped laughing) she asked if I thought I’d made the shortlist. I replied that I’d decided, upon reflection, that I really didn’t want the job.

He never called back. To be honest I think I blew the interview five minutes in, first when I laughed at his oh-so-serious questions, and then when I corrected a statement in the preamble to his next question with “actually, I’m not Jewish.” (He’d thought I was, because my friend was. Because that makes sense).

**I’d wanted to give away chocolate coins instead,  but I couldn’t find any because it wasn’t Christmas

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

At this point, I basically gave up. However, a guy I’d met and talked to very briefly at that same Hallowe’en party was present at a pre-dinner gathering at the same friends’ house a few months later. I hadn’t really felt like going out that night, but then I realised it was the first anniversary of getting my PhD, and decided this was an anniversary worth celebrating. I chatted to this guy at the house, and then he offered to give my friends and me a ride to the restaurant. This meant we all ended up sitting together at one end of our group’s cozy table for 15, and we just really hit it off. He pretended to hit on my (straight) male friend, as a joke – but only on the condition that he got my number after asking for my friend’s***. When we talked a couple of days later to arrange a date, I was bracing myself for the dreaded Sunday lunchtime suggestion… but instead he said “Are you free on Thursday night? What’s your favourite pub?” He showed up with flowers, let me win at pool (for the first and only time), walked me home, and kissed me at my door before telling me he’d call the next day. The rest, as they say, is history!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Happy Valentines Day!

***He also gave me his number – belt and braces approach – at the end of the night. When I turned the card over, I realised it was another woman’s business card. Turned out he hadn’t had any paper on him, so he did the logical thing – he asked another woman at the bar for her number, got her card, then wrote his own number on the back and gave it to me. I still have it, tucked away in my most-precious-keepsakes box!

Posted in Uncategorized | 43 Comments

Captcha *this*, sucker!

If you read a lot of blogs, you’ve probably seen something like this:

Official image used on project information page (see link below)

This is the reCAPTCHA version of the spam test that some blogs require commenters to pass before commenting; typing the correct word into the box proves that you’re a real person rather than a spam bot. (Well, usually. It’s not perfect, but it’s better than nothing).

reCAPTCHA harnesses the power of this system to help digitise old books and other texts: the first image is of a known, verified word that proves the commenter is a real person, whereas the second image is an unknown word from an old text that the digitising software was unable to recognise. So, one word at a time, blog commenters are helping to archive old texts. Pretty cool, eh?

My friend Beth’s blog, Not To Be Trusted With Knives, uses the reCAPTCHA system. The problem is that on her blog – and only on her blog – the system clearly hates me and is taking the piss. Luckily, I’ve been collecting evidence over the last few weeks…

Exhibit A:

this one (seen today) was only marginally difficult to decipher. The first word is ntsTVr, although what that’s supposed to mean is anyone’s guess.

The second one?

Hmm… does that say III? ttt? Or is it the Monster energy drink logo?

Well, now it says III. So there.

Exhibit B:

This one rejected my first two efforts at typing the first word (Jawahiri and Jawalwi). Maybe I was supposed to include the accents? Or is that a 4 at the end, not an i?

Exhibit C: this interpretation actually worked!

Exhibit D: but this one didn’t.

Just Alg didn’t work either. I’m still not sure what this one’s going for.

So there you go – Beth’s blog definitely hates me.

I still do love the reCAPTCHA concept, though, and think we should use it here at Occam’s Typewriter. Better than those alphanumeric strings – I keep getting the same one when I comment on different posts in the same session – and also much more useful and entertaining.

Posted in blog buddies, meta, silliness, technology | 27 Comments